top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[+] 117 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)
  • [–] 41 points 1 month ago* (2 children)

    Basing our world around a system that on average funnels the least empathetic, most callous, greedy and power hungry psychopaths and sociopaths to positions with the most influence surely cannot possibly backfire in a major way for the rest of us.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 1 month ago

    The self attribution fallacy

    https://www.monbiot.com/2011/11/07/the-self-attribution-fallacy/

    If wealth was the inevitable result of hard work and enterprise, every woman in Africa would be a millionaire. The claims that the ultra-rich 1% make for themselves – that they are possessed of unique intelligence or creativity or drive – are examples of the self-attribution fallacy. This means crediting yourself with outcomes for which you weren’t responsible. Many of those who are rich today got there because they were able to capture certain jobs. This capture owes less to talent and intelligence than to a combination of the ruthless exploitation of others and accidents of birth, as such jobs are taken disproportionately by people born in certain places and into certain classes.

    The findings of the psychologist Daniel Kahneman, winner of a Nobel economics prize, are devastating to the beliefs that financial high-fliers entertain about themselves.

  • source
  • [–] 26 points 1 month ago (54 children)

    Is there any system that reward talent, hard work or skill ?

  • source
  • hideshow 54 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    If you try to do that you need metrics for evaluation and then you get people gaming the metrics. One example is academia.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago* (2 children)

    You would think, but actually there's been some recent research that I think has interesting conclusions. The example, which is semi-related, is performance as a manager. When promoted using merit based, people tended to perform worse bcz they are promoted based on past performance in unrelated roles. When promoted randomly, the people who excelled at being a manager stayed in that position, and outperformed others who were promoted based on merit.

    The point being, you don't know who's going to be good at something based on past performance in unrelated roles. We've built an entire system based on that concept, and it's not really that surprising that it doesn't work that well. If I can find the research article again, I'll link it.

    Edit: found it

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    The point being, you don't know who's going to be good at something based on past performance in unrelated roles.

    What's surprising to me isn't that the random promotion system works over the performance in past unrelated roles system...

    What's surprising to me is that you practically never see the only other logical conclusion used in the business world much.

    Aptitude testing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Sports, kinda. It's possible to go unrewarded with them, but it's very hard to go rewarded without them.

    If you mean economic system, not really. Capitalism rewards having capital over everything else, communism (if we ignore the flawed attempts and go for theory) rewards everyone equally irrelevant of how hard you work or what your skills are. Though being skilled in something that's actually pleasant as a job is a reward in itself as you won't have to work manual labour.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [+] 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (20 children)
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago (11 children)

    No, don't be anti-education. Uneducated people make easy prey.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    in germany the apprenticeship system is very advanced and you can apprentice your way to a bachelor's equivalent with further study to a master's equivalent. that's how most trades work here. apprentices do part time studying at a trade school and part time working the trade over multiple years simultaneously, with exams issued by the school and for example a chamber of industry. it's very effective at turning students into effective workers, and if you find the right job you've got good prospects for a lifelong career, but obviously it does not teach you to doubt the system. of course there are also usually no "unnecessary" courses that would take away from an apprentice's focus. i think it's a decent balance, and you can always educate yourself on the state of the world in your free time.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • load more comments (7 replies)
  • load more comments (8 replies)
  • load more comments (10 replies)
    [–] 18 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Capitalism rewards fraud. It's the true american way.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 month ago* (1 child)

    Case in point - when imitation crab came out in the 80s it was freakin' delicious - tasted just like crab, and dirt cheap in comparison. But over the years they seem to have beem putting in less and less of whatever actual crab material gave it crab flavor, so now it's pretty much just nondescript fish + orange dye. A bad imitation of imitation crab. Instead of enjoying wonderful inventions like these we have to ruin them a little at a time so somebody can make a teensy bit more profit each time, until they're crap.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 13 points 1 month ago* (2 children)

    It also rewards putting words like Freedom and Liberty in the names of laws that restrict freedom and liberty.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 10 points 1 month ago

    It's in the name. Capitalism rewards capital.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    I'm all of those and I'm super rich

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    an yet, you're on lemmy with the rest of us...

    fake and possibly gay

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago

    Capitalism rewards capital. It's literally in the name.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Do you have money? No? fuck you

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago (3 children)
    load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 6 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    This implies neurosurgeons aren’t talented

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 5 points 1 month ago

    I need more upvote power.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago

    Capitalism rewards the lucky and the sociopathic.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    German saying: "a good horse only jumps ass high as it must."

    There are no bonus points for clearing the hurdle with space to spare. You have to jump high enough, but no more.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 4 points 1 month ago

    It's greed, reckless and a total lack of conscience which is rewarded.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›