top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 3 points 9 hours ago

Well… perhaps they should be looking at the H in DHL like that.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

    Just knowing about FedEx and the shit they pull, if they did ship a kid you'd never hear about it.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    People weren’t using enough stamps.

    It’s fine when the baby is shipped but then it grows and it doesn’t have enough stamps for the weight at delivery.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 23 hours ago (1 child)

    now the GOP is trying to USPS to discredit mail in ballots.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 14 points 1 day ago (5 children)

    Fun fact: USPS still ships livestock

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 13 hours ago (4 children)

    Less fun fact: USPS in recent years has been stacking things on the chicken boxes :(

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 hours ago (3 children)

    Ah that probably sucks :/. I'm guessing it harms the chickens somehow?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

    That's where the air holes are :(

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 hours ago (1 child)

    Oh... That's not where the air holes should be. Not the only air holes, at least. There are rules for what containers can get approved for mailing chickens.

    🤔 Now that I think about it, I vaguely remember there being some specs for crush resistance too, so maybe stacking is normal practice?

    I used to ship lots of things, but never animals, so my knowledge and memory of this is pretty fuzzy. Seems like some rules were broken to end up in that situation though... which still sucks

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 232 points 1 day ago (10 children)

    I honestly think it's kinda sweet how it worked to be honest.
    People showed up, gave their kid postage, and told the clerk they were mailing them. Clerk was confused for a minute, and then conceded that there was nothing technically forbidden about that. Kid hops on the scale, postage is correct, and the kid waits behind the counter until the trip to train, where they ride with the operator.

    Basically people gently gaming the system and the people involved saying "you're technically correct" and then looking after a random child.
    They only stopped it because they decided you can't operate a train and keep a kid safe at the same time, and weight is not a great way to price childcare.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 126 points 1 day ago* (3 children)

    Yeah, I actually think these types of thing are a healthy thing for society.

    The fact some parents were like “I can’t afford a train ticket” and some postal workers just went with it is great.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    i mean, some parents are currently like "i can only afford one plane ticket" and just have to hope the adult their kid gets sat by is safe. it kind of feels the same way.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 day ago

    Going through the postal service might have been safer than other forms of travel because there would have been more explicit exchanges of custody. Like put a kid on a passenger train and they could just get off and get lost before getting on a connecting train and who knows what happened to them? They arrived on train A but never got on train B.

    Whereas with mail, the kid becomes the operator's responsibility. If the kid is handed over to the operator to ride train A but then is nowhere to be found at the destination, then that operator is the prime suspect. Or the operator hands the kid off to the next operator in the journey and the kid is now their responsibility.

    And even if you have a babysitter, passenger stations are going to be a lot more crowded than cargo stations, so keeping track of a kid will be a lot easier, plus the driver is the babysitter for the postal service, so they won't miss their train or take the wrong one by accident (unless they are routed incorrectly lol).

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 1 day ago (3 children)

    and weight is not a great way to price childcare.

    I'd like to hear your solution then!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

    Look, I never claimed to be a genius. You can't just go asking people questions like that and expect them to know.
    I just know that childcare for a bushel of babies shouldn't be the same as for an individual seven year old.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 42 points 1 day ago (6 children)

    Miss me with the pro-privatized corporate slop. Where my public service homies at?

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 24 points 1 day ago (3 children)

    Context

    Tbf most of the other companies were not around back then (100 years ago) so maybe they would have also shipped kids (for profit)...

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 90 points 1 day ago (21 children)

    My wife's grandfather worked for the post office in a rural area and delivered live chicks to farms. With enough postage you could mail just about anything.

  • source
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • [–] 59 points 1 day ago (14 children)

    You can still mail order live chicks

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 1 day ago (3 children)

    Not only that, USPS is the only "major" carrier who will do so.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 1 day ago

    It's funny to put major in quotes. If you look at shipping volumes then USPS is really the only major carrier. Since they have to deliver everywhere they deliver something like 120 billion things a year, where the second is like...7 billion.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (10 replies)
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 20 points 1 day ago (4 children)

    Nothing sent by DHL, UPS or Fedex is mail.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 56 points 1 day ago (7 children)

    With FedEx the child would be neither living or breathing when it arrived.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 1 day ago (4 children)

    Ring camera video of driver yeeting child out the door of the truck and 20 feet to the porch

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)

    Still would use over fedex

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    Royal mail posted more....

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 18 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    Where the kids safe and healthy when they arrived?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 1 day ago*

    Here's some context. Context

    I do love that these postmen also just staight-up posed for photos with the babies they were carrying. Staight up the same shit we'd do now.

    Also this seems like the exact kind of child endangerment that would happen in a Ghibli film.

  • source
  • [–] 29 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    It's the living and breathing part the others have a problem with.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›