top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 53 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (18 children)

I apologize for making two comments in a row defending Piker, but I really don't think Piker is platforming a big newspaper like Haaretz in this situation. Aside from problems in his message that are true wherever he gives it, it's generally good to go on reactionary major media platforms to be able to present your arguments to their audience. If it was some tiny zionist rag, then of course he shouldn't go there and give them air, but this is not that situation.

  • source
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 3 weeks ago (15 children)
  • [–] 30 points 3 weeks ago (14 children)

    If he was using it to argue anti-Nazi points as he is arguing antizionist points here, literally yes, but I'm not sure that the comparison makes sense because I don't think Der Sturmer would print it, just as I don't think most of the other major Israeli newspapers would print this interview.

    I read the interview and it has a lot of silly Zionist editorializing, but I think Hasan correctly estimated that it would allow him to present his case, even to the incredulity of both the narratorial and interviewing voice. I don't think the fact that there would ve Zionist editorializing is a reason not to do it so, that's what most of their articles have anyway, what their audience is reading anyway, the main difference is that what most of their audience does not get from the paper most of the time is people giving simple, clear descriptions of why Israel is a fundamentally malignant project.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 3 weeks ago (13 children)

    he is going there, to be convinced by the right wingers, he is becoming more reactionary and not the otherway around

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 3 weeks ago (11 children)

    he is becoming more reactionary

    how? He was always kind of a radlib but I don't really see a shift in his tone.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 3 weeks ago (10 children)

    a few months ago he was supporting a Nazi war criminal SAer candidate

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 3 weeks ago (9 children)

    So did a lot of self proclaimed leftists, it was clearly a tactical error but I don't see that as evidence of him becoming more reactionary. Platner's platform by itself wasn't more reactionary than AOC's or any other mediocre socdem candidate. It's not exactly the first time he glazed a bad candidate, he gets caught up in electoralist bullshit regularly.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
  • [–] 7 points 3 weeks ago

    He is probably only going to be more reactionary, but it's because of the DNC, not fucking Haaretz. Why would Haaretz convince him of anything? They just gave the same dogwater talking points that he has been refuting for years.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 49 points 3 weeks ago (16 children)

    I really thought we solved the whole radlib platforming/deplatforming discourse years ago; if they're bigger than you, you're the one being platformed

    Anti-zionism advanced in any medium is good

  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 34 points 3 weeks ago* (3 children)

    I’m begging people to touch grass on this. Hasan is being attacked by the entire mainstream media apparatus right now, with Democrats and Republicans tearing into him for pushing anti-Zionism.

    Seriously, he is not your enemy in this lol. He might not have your same exact approach in fighting Zionism, but that doesn’t matter. Be normal and realize when an ally is an ally.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 8 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    Why does he keep defending our enemies? The democratic party? The same party that wants him gone?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 34 points 3 weeks ago* (1 child)

    What do you think he actually says all day lol?

    He’s not a blue-no-matter-who person. Probably half of his rants are about corrupt Democrats that he despises. I think him moving a bit more towards orgs like PSL would be good, yes, but I can also see the bigger picture here.

    I don’t say this often, but this is unironic wrecker shit. He’s one of the highest profile anti-Zionists in the US right now, and he’s being increasingly persecuted by the state. Seriously, pay attention to larger currents.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] [S] 26 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (5 children)

    Also Hasan when he meets and praises Bernie Sanders and Brad Lander: "They are not like other liberal zionists."

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    he’s right. many people are passive lib zios because they don’t understand. these two do understand and want to preserve israel as a jewish state through reform and “being nicer to the colonized”. sanders was a settler on a kibbutz and is nostalgic for the israel of the past. lander actively worked to tie israel to new york as comptroller. they aren’t like other liberal zionists, they’re worse

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 14 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    Lander's views must be condemned, but it's true that he has unusual views for a self-identified Zionist, because most of them explicitly support ethnonationalism over democracy and he, despite this being a Zionist and this being contradictory, says that everyone in Israel should have equal standing under the law regardless of ethnicity.

    I think Lander is an awful fool of a lib Zionist and he shouldn't be supported, and furthermore that Hasan is too soft on him, but Hasan is correct that Landers has unusual views.

    I say this as someone who dislikes Hasan and his apologists here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    New York City public pension funds increased their investment in Elbit Systems, Israel's largest weapons supplier, by 268% under Comptroller Brad Lander's management between June 2024 and June 2025.

    The holdings grew from approximately $280,000 to over $1 million in the arms manufacturer in the middle of Israel's livestreamed genocide of the Palestinians. Lander defends the investments as strictly adhering to a "fiduciary lens" required by law to secure maximum returns for retirees, stating he does not bring politics to pension management.

    Brad Lander has consistently stated that he opposes the Global Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement, arguing that its tenets are incompatible with Israel’s right to exist as a Jewish state.

    Brad Lander left the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) in October 2023 because the organization promoted a pro-Palestinian rally in Times Square on October 8. Lander described the rally as "heinous" and "vile" for the way it spoke about Hamas, stating he could no longer remain a member after 30 years.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 3 weeks ago

    I have no interest in arguing that Landers is in any way good, he is still a reactionary running dog, and I told you he should be condemned and Hasan is too nice to him, it's simply a fact that while he is a Zionist, he has some strange views compared to the Zionist establishment. Strange, not materially better, just strange.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

    I don’t understand why suddenly so many people on the left are accusing Hasan of being a zionist. Is it because he’s on the news all the time so he faces more scrutiny for being more famous? Is Finkelstein also a zionist? Is Hamas a zionist organisation for publicly supporting a 2 state solution?

    I understand that people criticise his moves in electoral politics but the accusations of him being a zionist are a recent development.

    With these standards most Palestinians would even be considered zionist because they usually lean very pragmatic in their political demands.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] [S] 7 points 3 weeks ago* (6 children)

    Most Palestinians wouldn't be arms in arms with Brad Lander.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

    Is he arms in arms with Brad Lander? Did he even endorse the guy? I think he’s naive in thinking he can change the democratic party through their official channels and also he’s naive for thinking that you can just overlook someone’s recent past if their platform is progressive enough but it’s pretty clear that Hasan is genuinely trying to influence politics to stop the genocide.

    It’s good to scrutinise him as he’s a big figure representing leftist politics but scrutinise him on endorsing Lander if he actually did that, rather than vagueposting about him being a zionist because he did an interview with an israeli newspaper in which he says that zionism needs to be treated the same way as nazism.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
  • [–] 14 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

    oh no, the newest influencer sweetheart of Usian established liberal zionist politicians is... gasp! a liberal zionist? never meet your heroes, kids.

    that being said i was a baby leftist once, and Hasan was an integral part of that development. is he actually a principled socialist playing both sides to keep his job/mansion? has he actually sold out for the clout (and the "hella israeli hasanabiheads")? who the hell knows, but actions speak louder than words or thoughts. wouldn't be the first demsoc to sell out ig

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 3 weeks ago

    This seems like a bad idea, you generally shouldn't give interviews to the people who have done everything in their power to smear you and lie about your position, all it does is legitimize their claims about you, and they won't play fair in the interview at all.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    The inevitable conclusion to any debate pervert's story arc

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    Doesn't it seem a little odd that the publisher puts in an aerial view of Khan Yunus, where you can see a square mile in which every single building is reduced to rubble?

    Normally the Zionist sources are saying "it's not that bad, it's exaggerated" but then they show the entire city destroyed, in comparison with a photo of a few burnt cars allegedly from the Nova music festival.

    The choice of pictures is almost making Hasan's point for him.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 3 weeks ago*

    "I've condemned October 7, I've talked about the crimes that took place. I've talked about the heinous violence we saw unfold, as did everyone else," he says. "I see it as an unfortunate and tragic consequence of 75 years of apartheid and occupation, where desperate people are leaning into unfathomable acts of violence as a final way to try to remind people that they're there and to make the occupation as costly as possible."

    – Hasan "not a liberal Zionist" Piker

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 3 weeks ago* (2 children)

    and this is how they repay him lmao, why aren’t you nicer to us

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    This says a lot however, it shows that his rhetoric is making liberal Zionists in America to actually consider what they are supporting and what they are belonging to. Pushing against the idea that one can just be a Zionist who doesn't believe in apartheid and occupation, just this vague idea of Jewish self-determination that is all positive and no contradictions, is good precisely because it is forcing the liberal Zionists to recognize they are being used as momentum and defense of the apartheid state that exists now. Israel is no longer a fantasy or an utopia, it is an actual state with actual politics that is proactively co-opting those liberal Zionists to use the very same Zionist label to commit genocide. It's at this point getting similar to wearing a swastika and saying it is a good luck charm. Jews in US are not Hindu or Buddhist unrelated to the Nazism, they are part of the very same political, economic and military entanglement that is committing the genocide.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 3 weeks ago

    it shows that his rhetoric is making liberal Zionists in America to actually consider what they are supporting and what they are belonging to.

    Inside every single liberal Zionist is a Gvir and a Smotrich struggling to get out. There will not have a change of heart. They didn't have a change of heart on Oct 7 and they won't have a change of heart now. The main point of attacking liberal Zionists is to force their inner Gvir and Smotrich to come out so that the rest of the world can properly see them as the enemies of humanity that they are. The world would be better off if every single liberal Zionist cut the bullshit and quit pretending they're not just another Gvir and Smotrich.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›