Have we all died and gone back to 2015? Do people still get mad about crackers feelings getting hurt?

cracker

all 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 33 points 1 month ago* (4 children)

Apparently it's transphobic or something

edit: the reason it's trending is that it replaced Captain underpants? on netflix? or something

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] 30 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Well now that's more worthy of criticism than the dumb shit I heard

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 40 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    from what I heard there's a villain who is a drag queen, there is gender bio-essentialism and I think it associates being Lesbian with being a cis woman.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 1 month ago (7 children)

    Excited for this thread to be locked at 100 comments within a day big-cool

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 1 month ago

    September 11th release date is incredible

  • source
  • [–] 27 points 1 month ago*

    sicko-fem ONLY IN THEATRES ON national-mourning-period

    sicko-no This was last year. Got review bombed at Rotten Tomatoes

    think-mark - they have to recycle their outrage slop because they can't find new outrage.

  • source
  • [–] 25 points 1 month ago (17 children)

    That was shown on Blorptube last year, I don't remember a ton about it other than she works out her feelings for the pink haired girl that doesn't want her and meets the teal haired one who does, and it was cute.

  • source
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 1 month ago (14 children)

    I read elsewhere the movie has some terf dog whistles. Is this true or overblown?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 1 month ago (13 children)

    It's true, the battleaxe she's holding there on the poster is one.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [+] 17 points 1 month ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)
  • [–] 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    There were enough dog whistles/general bad vibes that my girlfriend and I had to stop watching about 30 minutes in. I kept waiting for it to redeem itself somehow and it didn't. I don't know how to describe it without starting a struggle session I'd rather not deal with tbh.

    Suffice to say it's the kind of barely plausibly deniable shit that gets you dogpiled for misunderstanding how inclusive it is, actually. You're just misunderstanding. You're overreacting. And so on. You know the drill. It had bad enough vibes As Two Trans Women(tm) that we both felt like we were in danger.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago

    My girlfriend clocked it within the first 90 seconds or so. I thought it might redeem itself and it just kept digging itself deeper. It's on tankietube if you have a minute and a half to spare, so long as you're ready to disengage as soon as the vibes are off.

    Watching it felt like entering a "queer space" where there's one other transfem in the room and her eyes are full of an ineffable despair. I couldn't tell if it's meant to be crypto-TERF garbage or just the ambient queer transmisogyny that keeps happening in spaces when you don't center transfems. That same sense of danger.

    I stopped giving media the benefit of the doubt after that. It's not worth it, especially not when someone else is getting hurt because I'm being hard-headed.

    To turn this in a more - productive? - direction, if this film is an example of how not to tell a lesbian story (why are men the centerpiece of a movie about lesbians somehow? Why the tokenizing of trans women? Why the gender essentialism?), what would a good lesbian space princess movie look like? There's a story that's worth telling, and I'm glad somebody tried to tell it, but we can do better.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    just wanted to add that the two writers/directors have previously acknowledged this:

    We were really conscious of things like the labrys (a double-headed axe). It used to be a TERF symbol and we debated including it. In the end, we put it in the film because it should belong to all lesbians, including trans lesbians. Queen LeighAnn—who is a trans woman—is shown (in the film) summoning the labrys in trans colors. We felt the positive representation of inclusion was more powerful.

    linky

    also Queen Leanne (one of the main character's mums) is voiced by a trans woman

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Queen Leanne was the kind of transfem "rep" that makes me wish we were just invisible. IIRC she's a drag queen and the plot makes it explicitly clear she's not a woman like the other women (and other trans people in the movie!) are. Vibes were off enough my girlfriend and I had to stop watching 30 minutes in.

    Summoning a contested symbol that TERFs have used in the past and putting the trans colors on it, putting it in the hands of the trans woman character who exists so you can pat yourself on the back for being inclusive, is - what is the "positive representation of inclusion", here, exactly? Where does its power come from? It's trans liberalism. It's the language of somebody who wants to include a TERF symbol, is fully aware of its history, and decides to hand it to One Of The Good Ones in order to demonstrate - what? That makes it worse.

    Any story about trans women that trans women don't have complete creative control from start to finish is liable to wind up being eye-wateringly transmisogynistic, and this was no exception. I'm glad a nameless trans woman got a paycheck out of it, at least.

    This isn't a position I've reasoned myself into, and I'm not interested in hearing about how it's fine actually you're just overreacting, again. Tapping the Sartre quote about anti-semites.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Summoning a contested symbol that TERFs have used in the past and putting the trans colors on it, putting it in the hands of the trans woman character who exists so you can pat yourself on the back for being inclusive, is - what is the "positive representation of inclusion", here, exactly? Where does its power come from? It's trans liberalism. It's the language of somebody who wants to include a TERF symbol, is fully aware of its history, and decides to hand it to One Of The Good Ones in order to demonstrate - what? That makes it worse.

    my opinion is that i'm sick of symbol discourse and I'm sick of the whole concept of like, okay, some white supremacists went 👌 or something so now 👌 is for nazis forever now, like, I think we have more important things to worry about than having a constant rolling and expanding encyclopedia of dog whistles to keep track of and also permanently edify in our culture and language as belonging to bigoted shitheads forever (so that, like The Dunk Tank, some nerd 100 or 2000 years from now will go "UM AKSHUALLY 👌 IS A WHITE SUPREMACIST SYMBOL" no matter how far removed from any of the current modern shit that led to that association it ends up being). I think it yields an incredible amount of cultural influence to bigoted shitheads because it seems incredibly easy for literally anything to be taken and used this way.

    but as long as we're here worrying about symbols and other nonsense shit IMO the logic of taking the battle axe thing (whatever a labrys is, sounds french) and putting it in the hands of a trans character as a way of taking it back from TERFism totally makes sense. i'm not going to argue it isn't lib shit but like i get the logic

    the problem is it sounds like they entirely fucked up her character and, in doing so, fucked it all up so bad that it honestly looks like they were doing TERF stuff on purpose (going entirely on your description of the character because my exposure to this movie is literally contained to the posts in this thread, so idk anything about her)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago

    Yeah, you get it. If the story had been told differently it could have been a powerful moment. I really couldn't tell if it was that oblivious or just crypto-TERF shit laundered through some box-checking identity politics. The labrys was just the first thing that came to mind that was off about the movie.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 10 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    It is?? Not familiar with the labrys symbolism but I’d think battle axes would just be kind of a general sword lesbian thing. I looked it up on Wikipedia and I can’t find a definitive link there.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 1 month ago

    I have the willpower to simply not watch movies I know I won't like. Also,

    9/11

    Lmao.

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    this is the worst thing that happened on september 11th

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 20 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Why are people on Tiktok seething over a movie that got released almost a year ago?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 month ago

    Oh hey, my friend's housemate worked on that film. Hadn't heard anything about it outside of that (although I actively avoid ads)

    Small world.

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 1 month ago* (1 child)

    Idk what you mean, my TikTok is full of trans people vibing and Chinese food recipes I'll never get around making

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago

    I haven't seen the movie, but it feels like those mid-2010s YouTube animations regardless of its plot.

  • source
  • Judging purely on this poster the art style looks like hot garbage and that's the only opinion i'm ever gonna have on this

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago

    This was on blorptube last year, I watched the movie on my own and while the overall message was nice, holy fuck they messed up with the Black drag queen stereotype character trying to take a cis lesbian's "spiritual axe" for herself.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago

    I saw a video that had an extended joke about lesbian sounding like thespian and I decided this was probably not for me.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago

    It ticks enough of the wrong boxes for me so I'll never engage with it

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago* (1 child)

    Anyone who complains an iota about this is just self-reporting as a hypocrite.

    Most people love stonetoss, the turner diaries, americaman, etc…but a movie where for once, the punching bags of society turn to the people abusing them literally for no reason at all and say “no, YOU’RE bad!” and all hell breaks loose.

    I’ll never understand the psychology on why everyone roots for the abuser and hates the victims, ESPECIALLY when the victim fights back. Mark my words, in 20 years we will have people insist in media that the villains should be mary sues and always win because “bad is good and good is bad.”

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    The battleaxe tells me everything I need to know about this. I'm gonna take a shot in the dark here and guess that this has the classic TERF masc-black-drag-queen character?

  • source