Students learning about the Trump era gonna think we dumb as fuck
post
We'll see how many primary sources even survive the following decades.
Though I don't envy anyone who has to do history science when a large amount of primary sources are available. Imagine having to analyse Trump tweets for a paper.
We're in the age of AI now. Are future historians going to be able to trust primary sources?
I can see future students simply denying that anyone would have really voted for DJT.
"I refuse to believe that anyone was that dumb!"
Can't really blame them, I can hardly believe it now.
Many Germans did vote for Hitler (never the absolute majority of voters, though), even though he was clearly hateful and evil and obviously making lots of false claims, and on top of that looked completely ridiculous when he was shouting and screaming in his speeches. Can't remember seeing any German say that they don't believe that anyone voted for the guy.
You think history students have it bad.
Imagine lawyers post-Trump. Well, according to established case law minus 2025-2029...
Guessing it will be called The Stupid Ages, or maybe The Antichrist Years, depending on who is in charge.
If it's like before, eventually it'll be just a vague "things were bad" like the gilded age or great depression. Humans aren't great at learning big picture things.
Optimistic of you to be so sure they'll be studying history at all in the future.
Bold assumption that our descendants will have the kind of general education that would result in what we think of "extra homework" for "history students". I imagine a future scholar to be like Kenneth from 30 Rock
spoiler
(in his mortal form)

Wasn't history supposed to end mid 20th century?
All you young ones just wait until you get corrected in twenty years by someone like you because they didn't live it and think they know more about it than you.
It’s an outrageously optimistic hope of mine that there will be any students around to study history
Trump is trying to make it easier for history students by deleting all mention of racism and other forms of discrimination
So... the US president was part of a child eating cult-like sex trafficking net that was actually managed by moSS*d. Countries around the world that stump into that information used it to blackmail him.
At one point, the info got partially leaked, but he was kept in power for some reason.
First: that wont ever make it to a history book
Second: i wonder how many times things like this happened... this cabt be the first one
I might suggest that rather than saying people are dumb for having made certain decisions, that we should ask ourselves how the opinions that led to those decisions were formed. There are always external factors acting on and influencing our agency.
They're already gonna have a hard time recovering all the history deliberately destroyed by the administration.
My high school US history class spent like two weeks on the revolutionary war, half a class on everything that happened up to the civil war, two or three weeks on the civil war, half a class on the rest of the 19th century, like a week on WWII, the roaring 20's and dusbowl 30's got a week, and the rest of the class was World War 2, the 4 years that made up 60% of our 250 year history.
I have two hypotheses for why it was like that and they're not mutually exclusive:
-
WWII ends on a very boastful note for the USA. The defeat of not one but two objectively evil empires through both military and industrial might, that and having basically none of the fighting on our soil meant we came out of the war powerful and rich, eclipsing Great Britain as the superpower in the west. Almost immediately after that, history gets a lot less flattering.
-
The boomers were in charge of setting the school curriculum circa 2002, and by their logic "Then World War 2 happened, and then I was born, and then stuff I personally remember happened, and because I personally remember it, it isn't "history" therefore we don't have to teach it. You learn about Upton Sinclair in history class, you learn about the Cuban Missile Crisis by watching the news, that's just how it is."
As if.
They will water it down, shorten it up and place it at most on lesson on the side.
Realistically, for anything earlier than university level, classes don't have more time to cover additional material every few years, so new material being covered in class pushes out something that had previously been covered. Or it further abbreviates how much is taught about therm.
History students will continue to learn about some random battle of Jamestown in 1023 BC
all 48 comments