83
submitted 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) by tardigrade@scribe.disroot.org to c/europe@feddit.org

A cancer researcher in Osaka can now lead a European consortium and draw on EU funding just like a colleague in Vienna. As of August, Japan is formally part of Horizon Europe, the EU’s flagship research programme. It is by far the largest of the programme’s 23 associated countries, bringing 123 million people into Europe’s scientific network.

...

With a budget of €93.5 billion for the 2021–2027 period, Horizon Europe is EU's flagship research and innovation programme. It supports cutting-edge research and innovation to address global challenges, accelerate the clean and digital transitions, contribute to the UN Sustainable Development Goals and strengthen Europe's competitiveness and growth.

Japan [is] joining the other 22 countries already associated - either through the European Economic Area membership, the enlargement process, the European Neighbourhood Policy, or as other third countries and territories that meet the programme's eligibility criteria.

Japan's association builds on a long-standing and increasingly strategic research and innovation partnership with the EU initiated in 2011 with the Science and Technology cooperation agreement. A recent example of the close collaboration between the EU and Japan is the recommendation made by an EU-Japan expert panel which was done under the enhanced dialogue on advanced materials. This recommendation explores complementarities and synergies in the areas of electronics, mobility, construction, energy and data-driven science which can be both beneficial for EU and Japan citizens.

...

top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] huppakee@lemmy.world 12 points 6 days ago

The west used to be Europe + US & Canada, in the near future it might be Europe, Canada & Japan (& South-Korea? & Taiwan), at which point the west would not be a good name anymore. Just thinking.

[-] tardigrade@scribe.disroot.org 9 points 6 days ago

Yes, we are going through a strange timeline ... In this year's Copenhagen Democracy Summit in Warsaw, former Nato chief Anders Fogh Rasmussen proposed what he called the "D7", the "Democracy 7", comprising Australia, Canada, the European Union, Japan, New Zealand, South Korea and the United Kingdom (four of these countries are already members of the Community of Democracies).

Rasmussen pointed out that the D7 represents roughly US$36 trillion in combined GDP, approximately 30% of the global total, enough economic leverage to deter coercion by any country.

He said that the D7 must not be a closed club but could be joined by what he called associates, democracies aligned on specific initiatives (he named India, South Africa, Norway; we could add Taiwan and several other countries); as well as partners, non-democratic states that want to cooperate on single issues of mutual interest without partnership.

Here is Rasmussen's paper (pdf) if interested.

[-] huppakee@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago

I like that constalation, although I dislike it having democracy in the name. There are many countries that are democratic but not aligned with these 7, especially in Africa and Latin-America. But him saying in should not be a closed club is nice. It shouldn't be closed. But if the US travels much further on it current path it makes sense to improve our relationship with other friends.

[-] Pip@feddit.org 2 points 6 days ago

This made my day!

this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2026
83 points (98.8% liked)

Europe

11798 readers
682 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the admin that applied the rule (check modlog first to find who was it.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS