Looks like Trump is getting more than he bargained for when taking on BBC.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 209 points 1 month ago (51 children)

The BBC responded to the trust Wednesday in a court filing opposing the request to pause the order, arguing it “is a transparent effort to evade this Court’s clear and direct order and to continue to avoid the discovery obligations that Plaintiff took on when he chose to file this lawsuit.”

Wouldn't someone in the US with a passing familiarity of lawsuits and who has been in court innumerable times have an inkling about the discovery phase?

I recognize President Pedophile is incredibly stupid, in addition to being a horrible human being. But I'm struggling to see how he could have made this mistake. Additionally, he has lawyers. This is incredible.

Good on the BBC for fighting this.

  • source
  • hideshow 51 child comments
  • [–] 95 points 1 month ago (16 children)

    I'm hoping the beeb wins and gets everything they want. It will signal to other entities he's threatened with lawsuits that he's a stuffed shirt (and how!) that has more dirt to hide than they do.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 42 points 1 month ago (15 children)

    UK law is much more open to discovery than the US, and losers pay. Betcha Trump didn't know that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 1 month ago

    Oh, if that's the case, when he loses, he'll be chewing what's left of his hair.

    Trump HATES paying for anything.

    I've been in the Trades since 1980 and for years, the running snarky aside about him went "If you want to know whether Trump pays his bills, ask any electrician in New Jersey.."

    Apparently he's gone through a lot of them and stiffed quite a few over the decades.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 17 points 1 month ago (9 children)

    This case is in the US courts.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 44 points 1 month ago (8 children)

    Yep. That's one of the BBC's many arguments, that this case is being heard in the wrong place (Florida Southern District, Miami):

    the BBC’s position that Plaintiff’s claim is improperly before this Court, as the Documentary was never broadcast in Florida or the United States (page 15)

    It's worth a skim for anyone interested in these things; the number of ways he's trying to cheat, play dirty, and just manipulate the process are overwhelming.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 month ago (6 children)

    Oh a Florida Southern District court? Wonder why they chose that location.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • [–] 65 points 1 month ago (14 children)

    He thought the BBC would roll over like when he sued ABC and they just paid him 15 million and apologized to him. Or when he sued CBS and they paid him 16 million. The issue is that BBC is funded from taxpayer money and I don't think the British taxpayers would be very happy with them paying Trump.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    It's not quite tax payer money, we pay a licence fee to be able to watch live broadcast which funds the BBC (they also get a vast amount of money from licensing shows overseas). But your point is true that the public would be pissed if they just rolled over and paid without fighting Trump

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Yep.
    I'm a licence payer and not only would I be very upset if the BBC just paid the raging orange paedo, I also want to offer my services to fight that fat cunt.

    I mean physically. I don't have the money to win in court, however I'd be verrrrry happy to throw hands.
    Very happy.
    You have no way to gauge how happy I'd be to punch that useless pile of wobbling dementia riddled barrel of rape and corruption.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    ABC did that on purpose. They knew they could use the settlement as a disguised bribe to get preferential treatment from Trump. That was worth more than the legal battle that would drag on for years and net them nothing. He still hasn't paid E. Jean Carroll. He certainly wouldn't have paid out the ABC case.

    What they did is the equivalent of paying a crooked cop. It's textbook racketeering. "Pay me and we'll protect you." -every one of the 5 families.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • [–] 41 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Additionally, he has lawyers.

    Lawyers he refuses to listen to because he thinks he's "smarter than them".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 38 points 1 month ago

    He doesn't file lawsuits to actually win them, he files them as intimidation. He expects the other side to cave, and to settle. I tried to search for lawsuit Trump actually won on their merits, without a negotiated settlement, and could only find one that was a default judgement (so the other side didn't even show up).

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 20 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    He's banking on the news not making it over here since he pretty much controls all of the media now.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 1 month ago*

    I recognize President Pedophile is incredibly stupid, in addition to being a horrible human being. But I'm struggling to see how he could have made this mistake. Additionally, he has lawyers.

    He's burned through many lawyers and there are few reputable or intelligent lawyers left who might be willing to light their careers on fire. Sure, he might find one willing to trade their career for whatever benefits they might get (or maybe they just have a hard on for fascism, which often means they are fucking stupid too), but most of his lawyers have, eventually, been left holding a flaming bag of shit while Trump transparently lies and pretends he has never heard of them or has heard they aren't very good.

    It's happening to pretty much the entire fucking justice department. It used to be a very sought after career. Now they are giving fresh grads signing bonuses and then shuffling them into the meat grinder and sacrificing their reputation to further the administration's nakedly corrupt agenda. "Hey, new kid, I need you to take this case." Turns out the case is about some poor immigrant that been detained for months and then deported despite having court orders protecting him from deportation... that were clumsily bypassed with unsigned orders or some other bullshit. New kid sits in front of a frustrated judge yelling at him and the kid can only say "I don't know what happened" and go home and cry into his pillow.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 56 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    He's not gonna take that BBC lying down!

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 1 month ago*

    He'll wiggle and worm for all he's worth but then drop the suit before they can climax.

    I hope they counter sue for their defense costs and as much more as they possibly can. I wonder if the BBC counter suing him on the grounds that this lawsuit from him was filed based on a lie (his imaginary $10b loss), he failed to comply with the court order to disclose finances to prove the loss he himself had claimed, and then when the judge refused to stay that order he ended up dropping his case entirely would be a way to try to force the same financial record disclosure?

    I'd imagine not under normal circumstances, the burden of proof being on the one suing... but with that chain of events and every historic estimate of Trump's net worth having been far less than that claimed $10B loss... it seems like it might be possible.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 47 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    Looks like Trump is getting more than he bargained for when taking on BBC.

    Which BBC we talking about here?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 39 points 1 month ago* (4 children)

    Gosh, it would be a shame if all his financial records got released without his consent. You know… like all the names and personal information of the Epstein victims.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 35 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    I wouldn't be surprised if Trump wasn't aware that the BBC isn't 'Murican

    I mean, he's a fucking idiot, after all

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 33 points 1 month ago

    Trump is afraid of BBC.

    Use this headline as you will.

  • source
  • [–] 29 points 1 month ago (13 children)

    I think he'll drop the suit so that he doesn't have to disclose the tax documents. You know he's committing tax fraud, and if those docs are released, the world will know. That won't affect him now, but it will in 2.5 years.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 month ago*

    Yeah he may have gotten away with real-estate fraud, tax fraud, election fraud, rape, stealing classified documents, literally coup attempts against congress, but he won't get away with tax fraud.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] 24 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    There's something so beautiful to see about him hanging himself with his own rope, because of his stupidity and arrogance

    I look forward to his death, and I hope that it hurts the whole time

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 21 points 1 month ago

    Dump expected the British media to just roll over like the media does here in the States.

  • source
  • [–] 19 points 1 month ago

    I would love to have his backers outed as well.

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 child)

    The terrible BBC I call them, horrible people and a bad outlet and I'm told, going under any day now! Big business guy, friend of mine the other day told me they're not doing too - well. In dire... dire straights and about to go... under. The terrible BBC!

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 10 points 1 month ago

    I keep saying that these defendants should stop settling, and start demanding their day in court, with a FEROCIOUS discovery, and a countersuit to make him cover the legal costs if he loses.

    Then REFUSE to settle, or drop the case. Follow it all the way through, you know he'll never win.

    Fight fire with a Supernova.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago (3 children)
    load more comments (3 replies)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›