630

Looks like Trump is getting more than he bargained for when taking on BBC.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Kirp123@lemmy.world 63 points 1 day ago

He thought the BBC would roll over like when he sued ABC and they just paid him 15 million and apologized to him. Or when he sued CBS and they paid him 16 million. The issue is that BBC is funded from taxpayer money and I don't think the British taxpayers would be very happy with them paying Trump.

[-] LincolnsDogFido@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 day ago

ABC did that on purpose. They knew they could use the settlement as a disguised bribe to get preferential treatment from Trump. That was worth more than the legal battle that would drag on for years and net them nothing. He still hasn't paid E. Jean Carroll. He certainly wouldn't have paid out the ABC case.

What they did is the equivalent of paying a crooked cop. It's textbook racketeering. "Pay me and we'll protect you." -every one of the 5 families.

[-] ltxrtquq@lemmy.ml 2 points 18 hours ago

ABC is owned by Disney, there's an equally likely chance they were afraid Trump would retaliate by blocking a merger or something. I don't know what merger it would have been, but it feels like there's a pretty good chance Disney is trying to buy some other company at any given time.

[-] NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip 1 points 22 hours ago

Well yeah because Trump could get their license revoked.

He does not have that leverage with the bbc

[-] LincolnsDogFido@lemmy.zip 3 points 21 hours ago

He could have tried to get their license revoked, but would have lost the ensuing lawsuit on first amendment grounds. ABC was never at risk of losing their license. They willingly chose the bribe. A lawyer that just passed their BAR exam could have won that case.

[-] NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip 1 points 21 hours ago

but would have lost the ensuing lawsuit on first amendment grounds. ABC was never at risk of losing their license.

I don't agree. They could revoke it and drag it through the courts, but it could take years. They also could make up any reason they wanted to distance itself from free speech rules.

They willingly chose the bribe.

I agree that the result is the same, but they saw the carrot AND the stick.

[-] toph@feddit.uk 49 points 1 day ago

Also, as a foreign broadcaster the Trump-controlled FCC can’t threaten the BBC’s license. I think this is a factor in the US-based broadcasters rolling over.

[-] DanceMomsSavedMe@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 day ago

Don't you mean the "land of the free"-based broadcasters? Lol

[-] BlaestEgnen@feddit.dk 4 points 1 day ago

There's also a stark difference between 15 mil and 10 bn

[-] wool0698 12 points 1 day ago

It's not quite tax payer money, we pay a licence fee to be able to watch live broadcast which funds the BBC (they also get a vast amount of money from licensing shows overseas). But your point is true that the public would be pissed if they just rolled over and paid without fighting Trump

[-] D_C@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 day ago

Yep.
I'm a licence payer and not only would I be very upset if the BBC just paid the raging orange paedo, I also want to offer my services to fight that fat cunt.

I mean physically. I don't have the money to win in court, however I'd be verrrrry happy to throw hands.
Very happy.
You have no way to gauge how happy I'd be to punch that useless pile of wobbling dementia riddled barrel of rape and corruption.

[-] skisnow@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago

happy to throw hands

Eh, he's got some heft to him. You're better off trying to sweep the leg.

[-] Brown5500@sh.itjust.works 2 points 22 hours ago

Have you seen his calves though? I'm not sure that a leg sweep is moving one of those. I suppose you might pop it instead which would still be interesting at least.

[-] nkat2112@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

Goodness, this was brilliantly stated and I salute you. I think many would want to follow in your lead. An orderly line of eager participants, each wishing to have their turn, might be required.

[-] YeahToast@aussie.zone 1 points 1 day ago

How does the old licensing fee go these days ? It was a pretty poor payment at the best of times wasn't it? Can't imagine since streaming arrived anyone pays for tv?

this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2026
630 points (99.7% liked)

News

38679 readers
2536 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS