Looks like Trump is getting more than he bargained for when taking on BBC.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 65 points 1 month ago (14 children)

He thought the BBC would roll over like when he sued ABC and they just paid him 15 million and apologized to him. Or when he sued CBS and they paid him 16 million. The issue is that BBC is funded from taxpayer money and I don't think the British taxpayers would be very happy with them paying Trump.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 50 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Also, as a foreign broadcaster the Trump-controlled FCC can’t threaten the BBC’s license. I think this is a factor in the US-based broadcasters rolling over.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    It's not quite tax payer money, we pay a licence fee to be able to watch live broadcast which funds the BBC (they also get a vast amount of money from licensing shows overseas). But your point is true that the public would be pissed if they just rolled over and paid without fighting Trump

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Yep.
    I'm a licence payer and not only would I be very upset if the BBC just paid the raging orange paedo, I also want to offer my services to fight that fat cunt.

    I mean physically. I don't have the money to win in court, however I'd be verrrrry happy to throw hands.
    Very happy.
    You have no way to gauge how happy I'd be to punch that useless pile of wobbling dementia riddled barrel of rape and corruption.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    ABC did that on purpose. They knew they could use the settlement as a disguised bribe to get preferential treatment from Trump. That was worth more than the legal battle that would drag on for years and net them nothing. He still hasn't paid E. Jean Carroll. He certainly wouldn't have paid out the ABC case.

    What they did is the equivalent of paying a crooked cop. It's textbook racketeering. "Pay me and we'll protect you." -every one of the 5 families.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    ABC is owned by Disney, there's an equally likely chance they were afraid Trump would retaliate by blocking a merger or something. I don't know what merger it would have been, but it feels like there's a pretty good chance Disney is trying to buy some other company at any given time.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (2 children)

    Well yeah because Trump could get their license revoked.

    He does not have that leverage with the bbc

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    He could have tried to get their license revoked, but would have lost the ensuing lawsuit on first amendment grounds. ABC was never at risk of losing their license. They willingly chose the bribe. A lawyer that just passed their BAR exam could have won that case.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    but would have lost the ensuing lawsuit on first amendment grounds. ABC was never at risk of losing their license.

    I don't agree. They could revoke it and drag it through the courts, but it could take years. They also could make up any reason they wanted to distance itself from free speech rules.

    They willingly chose the bribe.

    I agree that the result is the same, but they saw the carrot AND the stick.

  • source
  • parent