244
top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] arctanthrope@lemmy.world 19 points 2 hours ago

I'm sure these topics become relevant at some point, but I'm doubtful that it's absolutely necessary to address them in an intro course. how does leftist ideology help kids understand what a while loop does

like, literacy can do all of these things too, that doesn't mean you have to introduce those concepts at the same time as the abc's

[-] ChristerMLB@piefed.social 19 points 4 hours ago

I guess it is just a matter of time before the Trump regime designates logic as hardcore leftist ideology

[-] BuboScandiacus@mander.xyz 10 points 3 hours ago

What? This is plain stupid

[-] 4am@lemmy.zip -3 points 2 hours ago

found the omarchy user

[-] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 10 points 4 hours ago
[-] tetris11@lemmy.ml 48 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

I genuinely used to believe this too, but the CCC opened my eyes to anarchism, and then HN opened my eyes to plutarchism.

I iterate now between several modes of: "GPLv3 is the best license humanity can use to better itself, decentralised projects are mandatory to keep authoritarian regimes at bay, but damn do I love using MIT projects in my hobby code projects, and hmm it would be nice to make some side income with said hobby project...."

Each of these contradictions of the other, which bothered me in my late 20s, but now I think it's relatively normal to inhabit several conflicting ideals at once

[-] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 71 points 5 hours ago

hmm it would be nice to make some side income with said hobby project...."

This is a symptom of being forced to live under capitalism. If your needs were generally met by society you wouldn't have this urge.

[-] BreakerSwitch@lemmy.world 19 points 2 hours ago

I actually really hate that every hobby should be incorporated into hustle culture these days. You crafty? Sell what you make. You like fixing things? Charge people for it. You play video games? Stream.

We've built a world that only cares about cash and it's exhausting

[-] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 2 points 45 minutes ago

I like to fix things. I more like to fix things for people in my community to help build community.

[-] NotSteve_@lemmy.ca 1 points 17 minutes ago

I remember hearing about repair drives or something along those lines in my community where handy volunteers spend a day fixing peoples things for free

[-] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 12 points 5 hours ago

There is no contradiction between GPL and making some side income.

[-] Azzu@leminal.space 13 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

In fact, it's more likely, since for example, you could make corporations pay for being able to use your code under a different license.

If it was MIT, they can just use it and give you fuck all.

[-] 5too@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Or, as the SME on it, you can offer paid support for it

[-] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 18 minutes ago

You could literally sell the unchanged Linux kernel, the GPL allows that as long as you abide by the other provisions. Convincing someone they should pay for something that you also have to provide for free might be a tad difficult but it wouldn't be against the license

[-] stankmut@lemmy.world 12 points 6 hours ago

I feel you on the license thing. There's the appeal of software that can't be easily corporatized and then there's the idea that if I could just get lucky with my own project, I wouldn't have to work for some soulless company generating value for shareholders.

[-] tetris11@lemmy.ml 20 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

I dream of a world where UBI is ubiquitous and people can just eke out a living following their passion projects and the need for closed source projects just vanishes....

Rant/Fantasy:
I also dream of a world where capitalism exists but there's a mandatory enforcement of the Gini Coefficient being less than 5%. As in, people still trade goods/services with each other, can absolutely make money, corner markets and bribe regulators to keep their competitors out, with the caveat that the most they can ever make by putting in such time and effort towards corruption makes them at maximum only 5x richer than the average person.

A hard cap limit on the maximum wealth would IMO enable capitalism to actually function properly, the state wouldn't have such strong powers over the individual, and nor will the individual wield really that much power over others. I'm probably veering now into anarcho-capitalism, which is always dangerous territory because the greatest propenents for it tend to be cryptobro eugenic shitheads....

Edit: Oh and such enforcement would require some kind of god-level regulator without any humans in the loop, so I'm going to call it "anarcho-muted-capitalism-AIkillerdroneregulator". I'm also going to stop talking now.

[-] dangling_cat@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

If we have to live under capitalism, wealth cap is the best outcome. Wealth cap ensures no more private equity, better utilization of capital and goods (no more super yachts!), and corporations become coops. But then it’s a dangerous territory towards Christianity… So any kind of centralized government requires to be a benevolent god… hmmmmm

[-] sculptor0725@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 hours ago

5% would be 20×

What's to keep someone from bribing someone to make it so they can make more money than other people

[-] tetris11@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 hours ago

how do you make that calculation just out of interest. I "vibed" 5x but didn't know how to calculate it

[-] sculptor0725@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 hours ago

5 per cent/per 100. 20 goes into 100 5 times so 5 goes into 100 20 times. Also 5 is half of 10 that goes into 100 10 times? Idk how does math even work

[-] Bouchtroubouli@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago

Please, do not stop talking !

[-] thisisbutaname@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 6 hours ago

So basically the problem is capitalism

[-] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 6 points 6 hours ago
[-] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 1 points 6 hours ago

All would be cool if it weren't for rent and having to pay for food.

[-] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.ca 7 points 6 hours ago

It's fine to contradict yourself, as long as you don't impose those contradictions on the world or externalise that tension. Hold it within yourself, and I will hold mine.

[-] tetris11@lemmy.ml 7 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

But I need to be heard and seen at all times! I have an attention deficit problem!

[-] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.ca 21 points 6 hours ago

I can't help but broadly agree, computing is the new de facto means of production. It is inherently political.

[-] MidsizedSedan@lemmy.world 16 points 6 hours ago

"...because when we go online, we free ourselves from consumerism, racism, and get to express ourselves however we want without it getting back to our school or employer."

Honest Trailers may have gone downhill from thier peak, but Hackers (and the OG Dune) videos gave great lines worth sharing

[-] FishFace@piefed.social 4 points 6 hours ago

Well, programming lessons taught in 2016 are still pretty much going to teach programming now, so it shouldn't be too hard if you put your mind to it.

this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2026
244 points (95.5% liked)

Microblog Memes

11921 readers
1592 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS