219
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by Deep@mander.xyz to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] homes@piefed.world 41 points 2 weeks ago

I’m glad the interviewer really stood up to him and pushed back, for what it was worth

[-] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 29 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, its really sad that we're so used to TV hosts letting republicans rant and rave about every insane, unhinged thing they are desperate to present as truth without even a question or concern about it, that it stands out and is shocking and unusual when someone just.. challenges them and pushes back on the absolute industrial grade spewing of raw verbal sewage.

[-] homes@piefed.world 14 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Well, it wasn’t just verbal sewage coming out of his mouth, it was abject lies, combined with a whole bunch of personal attacks against her in particular, and she just wasn’t having it. His hypocrisy and double standards… He was practically slapping her in the face with them and daring her not to call him out, and she called his bluff, all right. It was plain as day for every viewer to see. And when she did it, he had the temerity to call her unfair. It was outrageous, and she made him look like a complete buffoon.

It was quite refreshing.

[-] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

I'm really interested in what your idea of verbal sewage is, if you're arguing that lies and insults and bullshits arent it.

[-] homes@piefed.world 10 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I didn’t say it wasn’t verbal sewage; I said:

it’s not just verbal sewage

And used that as a pretext delve into specifics.

Clearly, you misunderstood what I was saying

[-] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

I think there was a miscommunication. I wasnt coming at you, I was just genuinely interested.

[-] homes@piefed.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

I hope I was able to clear things up

[-] Septimaeus@infosec.pub 1 points 2 weeks ago

LIG, you’re in agreement

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I'm assuming he's just used to the "liberal media" playing the idiotic "objective journalism" card.

Which means they just let Republicans get away with saying absolutely insanely wrong bullshit, and then maybe let a Democrat counter it and turn to the camera and say, "See? We presented both sides!"

The way they treat things like science (as a general rule) is absolutely criminal in my view. I'm surprised to see her pushing back like this. I hope this kind of interview style catches fire everywhere when dealing with lying liars and their disgusting lies.

[-] TryingToBeGood@reddthat.com 7 points 2 weeks ago

CNN is pretty good about fact checking these liars. I saw one poor guy on CNN a few nights ago having to explain how wind turbines and the power grid work after dumbfuck trump was blathering about how when there’s no wind there's no power and everyone sits in the dark.

[-] homes@piefed.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

CNN has also been pretty good at calling in members of the new independent YouTube media like Brian Tyler Cohen as commentators to ROYALLY FUCK UP these mealy-mouthed propaganda parrots from the MAGAsphere, and it's glorious.

Here he is just slitting the throat of bleach-blonde fembots like MAGA parrot Katie Zachariah:

>YouTube Link<

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I still had to laugh at how Scott Jennings blew a gasket over talking to Adam Mockler.

[-] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 28 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Another idiot going after Fauci. RFK jumping on the Rand Paul bandwagon.

Rand Paul is a fucking ophthalmologist who thinks he’s in the same class as Fauci. Dunning Krueger much?

[-] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

Paul was sued twice for malpractice.

[-] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 17 points 2 weeks ago

RFK Jr yelling at Dana Bash looks like the second before a hot dog blows up in the microwave.

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Imagine how shitty a country has to be to Have Psychopath Trump as President, maniac RFK Jr. as Secretary of Health and Nazi Pete Hex-breath as Secretary of WAR!!

These people are all literally insane and completely incompetent.

Well done USA! 🤡 🤡

[-] zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 2 weeks ago

Wait. This is legit the first time I heard RFK Jr.’s voice. Was he always like that?

[-] mufkin@lemmy.zip 14 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Yes. He got sick years ago and it caused him to sound that way.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s voice issue is spasmodic dysphonia, a rare neurological disorder where the muscles that control the vocal cords spasm involuntarily, making his speech sound strained, broken, or “strangled.” It is lifelong, and treatment commonly involves botulinum toxin (Botox) injections to reduce the spasms.

[-] NoSpotOfGround@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago
[-] nullspace@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago

He drinks the botox because he doesn't trust needles.

[-] Jax@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago

Trump gets mad at RFK, suddenly he's recommending the measles vaccine and barking up Fauci's ass - because what else can you do in RFK's shoes? Dude's destined to be a fall guy.

[-] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago

If they are all using logic then WHY is there YELLING???

[-] AmidFuror@fedia.io 4 points 2 weeks ago

But when RFK Jr. was an environmental lawyer and had figured out that Monsanto and glyphosate were all part of a giant conspiracy, he had it right. Right?

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

This asshole sits there and says the Covid vaccine didn't work.

These people are all dangerous monsters.

this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2026
219 points (99.1% liked)

politics

30811 readers
2218 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS