top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 106 points 4 weeks ago* (2 children)

He doesn't understand the concept of Discovery does he? This isn't even at that point yet and he's already fucking lost.

"They're woke"!

"He was laundering money. Of course we have the receipts, because we're a bank."

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 63 points 4 weeks ago (1 child)

    He's at the stage where he no longer needs to care about discovery. He has been public that he is above the law. He will use taxpayers' money to attack Capital One. There is no downside.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

    He’s gonna die in prison. I predict this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 71 points 4 weeks ago (1 child)

    christ how stupid are these people. yes, please give capital one a reason to make a public record of their concerns of your very valid money laundering everyone already knows about.

    they have deep pockets, and better lawyers.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 46 points 4 weeks ago (1 child)

    I'm at the point where it's like, what does it matter? What would more evidence do? I don't even see this as a mistake anymore. If the Trumps get the case to the supreme court, they will enrich themselves further, and there's just no downside to losing, other than more evidence of crimes coming out. Why would they be worried about that though

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 4 weeks ago (1 child)

    im hoping this adds fuel to the potential revolt that may happen after trump dies his cowardly death.

    one can dream

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 4 weeks ago (8 children)

    If anything, his death is going to mollify people. This is the height of public outrage, and nothing has happened yet. I don't foresee any kind of armed resistance until things get way worse materially, maybe 5-10 years.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 4 weeks ago* (1 child)

    Starving will be required for a real revolt. We won’t risk starvation until we’ve got no other choice.

    A few more years of climate disasters and war shortages might get us there though. A few of us already are going hungry.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 weeks ago* (1 child)

    This is it. Even if it’s not quite starvation (the USA wastes 1/3 of its food output, we could lose 1/3 and still be okay with some rationing), massive supply shortages across the board will push people over the edge.

    Ironic how capitalists criticize socialist governments for making people wait for basics, yet we may end up in exactly the same position while the Epstein class continues to operate like bandits and hoard all the wealth.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (7 replies)
  • [–] 62 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

    ...and the only punishment was closing the accounts?

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 48 points 4 weeks ago (4 children)

    What else is the bank supposed to do. I get what you're saying though. The slow-ass courts will probably never do anything about it

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 4 weeks ago

    If you or I get a bank account shut down for money laundering concerns someone will be at the door the same day to tall to us face to face about it and we'd be facing around 10 years in prison.

    If rich fucks in suits do it they seem to just close the account and move on

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 4 weeks ago (1 child)

    Report it to the FBI? Or IRS? Or any number of 3-letter agencies?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

    I'm sure Kash will get right to investigating this after releasing the Epstein files.

    But yes, I get it. We'd be hearing about this for the next 2.5 years if this was Biden.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 6 points 4 weeks ago

    It was 300 accounts. It's not clear, but sometimes AML closures means they take all the money.

    That could have been millions or billions of dollars that Trump lost. That's quite significant..

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 34 points 4 weeks ago (7 children)

    Capital One gave notice of its plans to close more than 300 Trump-affiliated bank accounts

    Jesus, 300? How do you even have more than one bank account with a single bank?

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 4 weeks ago (1 child)

    Easy, every organization and every need is it's own bank account if you don't want accounting to be a nightmare

    Like if you take money, it should go in accounts receivable. For expenses, accounts payable. And then you'll want something for the pile of money before it's transferred/sorted, maybe a few for money held aside for various reasons, maybe separate ones for payroll, services from vendors, and miscellaneous things like office supplies. Etc etc etc

    The more money moving around the more seperating out the money flows makes sense. A dozen or two bank accounts for mid sized company is pretty reasonable. A big one might have a dozen per department

    What is a bank account but a digital box to put numbers in anyways? It costs next to nothing per account, but clear delinitation of the money makes it a lot easier to make sure it's going to the right place instead of being pocketed

    Or alternatively, lots of accounts could make it very difficult to make sense of. But that kind of deliberate obsfucation might trigger some kind of anti money laundering alerts

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 4 weeks ago* (1 child)

    I think you're confusing an accounting tool, called double entry booking, for services offered by a bank. Every accounting software allows for tracking expenses and incomes in virtual 'accounts' that have little to do with the credit offered by banks. For example, 'dry cleaning' could be the name of an expense account, despite the dry cleaners not offering you an actual bank account.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 weeks ago

    Exactly. For example, I have a number of side hustles in addition to my work, and for other reasons, I have income, assets and expenses in two different countries. So I have over 100 virtual accounts in a multicurrency accounting package (for accounting geeks, that's my chart of accounts). But in each country, I have only 2 or 3 bank accounts. You don't need separate physical accounts, all you need is tagging. And my transaction volumes are low enough that I can spend an hour a week keeping my accounting package synchronized with the accounts. And I also use another instance of the same accounting package to do detailed financial forecasting a couple of years ahead, then correct forecast to actual as I go along.

    It also makes doing taxes really simple.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 4 weeks ago* (1 child)

    I have 6 for personal use, which makes accounting so much easier. I assign a budget at the beginning of the month and at any time I have a good overview of how much I spent for that duration.
    To illustrate, this is how I split my accounts:

    • personal expenses
    • household budget / groceries. This one's a shared account with my GF
    • savings
    • credit card
    • rent / utilities. Pay in a fixed amount each month, slightly higher than average spending and then not get shafted when insurance or a high electricity bill is due.
    • work travel. This one is the exception. It's empty unless I travel somewhere for work, then I top it up and at the end I copy and paste all my expenses from this account for travel reimbursement

    I spend less than 15 minutes each month on accounting and the only downside is that I have to set up several budgets and carry a round several cards to pay with. Once a year I go through the accounts and adjust budgets if necessary.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    Ah so this is what responsible organized budgeting looks like.

    I have the all mighty checking account and savings account I never transfer anything into.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 4 weeks ago (1 child)

    ? I have always had at least two as an adult. How do you only have one?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 4 weeks ago (1 child)

    Capital One has never accused the Trump Organization of money laundering. ​But Friday’s filing argues that “documents and Plaintiffs’ own ‌allegations make clear that Capital One closed ‌Plaintiffs’ accounts for anti-money laundering (‘AML’) reasons

    Yeah, that basically just means the risk exceeds their risk appetite. It's the same reason banks won't deal with legal pornography or gambling companies.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 weeks ago (1 child)

    If a bank closes your bank account, does that mean they steal the funds? Or can you still withdrawal it for transfer to another bank?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›