62

President Donald Trump has grown increasingly "exasperated" as the war in Iran stretches into its sixth month, with NBC News reporting Wednesday that the president recently erupted at top national security officials amid deep divisions inside his administration over how to proceed.

The post Trump ‘Exasperated’ as His Top Officials at Odds Over Iran War Strategy: Report first appeared on Mediaite.

top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 hour ago

trump exasperated that, after starting a potential WW3, it still isn't enough to deflect from his pervert degeneracy. Release the trump/epstein mp4's.

[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 hour ago

Is it possible to die of exasperation?

Asking for a friend

[-] deft@lemmy.wtf 1 points 46 minutes ago

Just die already

[-] nkat2112@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 hour ago

Note how an attempt was made to appease him by pointing out there were some "tactical victories", before immediately pointing out they are facing defeat:

The same official warned the administration has “had a series of tactical victories,” but is “facing a strategic defeat without clear policy guidance or a decision about where this is going.”

And it seems the victor doesn't feel compelled to negotiate:

Another person close to Trump told NBC News that the president has become increasingly discouraged by Iran’s refusal to strike a deal.

This yields strong "Who knew?" vibes, though concerning provoking war as opposed to addressing a nation's healthcare needs:

“The president is exasperated,” the ally said. “I don’t think he believed it was going to be this difficult to get the Iranians to agree to a deal. … There was not a real strategy for how long or what they should do to get to the endpoint.”

“He did not intend this to be a long, drawn-out war,” the ally added.

[-] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 16 points 4 hours ago

He fucked up so badly that there are no good options left. The least bad is to surrender, even if it means paying compensation, and to get the fuck away from Hormuz and Iran.

So now he's just looking for scapegoats but has no ideas of his own that won't make things even worse. He's too vain and stupid to ever admit that it's his fault that he was such a dim bulb as to get suckered by Netanyahu's tired old sales pitch.

[-] FaceDeer@fedia.io 15 points 5 hours ago

"I ordered you to win. Why haven't you won yet? And note that I won't accept any answer you give."

[-] Hegar@fedia.io 22 points 7 hours ago

Of course he's exasperated - he has dementia. He lacks the cognition to be anything but exasperated. No way he has the capacity to understand the situation.

[-] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 6 points 4 hours ago

It's not just dementia. There are other DSM categories that apply: primarily malignant narcissism and being a cunt.

[-] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 1 points 28 minutes ago

being a cunt.

Having never studied psycology or ever opened the DSM, I must accept this as a valid mental health diagnosis that could be given.

[-] benjirenji@slrpnk.net 5 points 4 hours ago

True. My grandma would be the same were she in the war room with the generals.

[-] espentan@lemmy.world 29 points 8 hours ago

Holy shit, there are strategies?!

[-] Theoriginalthon@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

No strategy is technically a strategy, confuse the opponent!

[-] Thassodar@sh.itjust.works 21 points 7 hours ago

"Concepts" of a strategy.

[-] daannii@lemmy.world 12 points 8 hours ago

Whatever claude says vs openAI says.

[-] NoSpotOfGround@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago

Bang stick harder. Ooga booga let go of balls now.

[-] Worthess@discuss.online 6 points 7 hours ago
[-] ptsdstillinmymind@lemmy.today 6 points 6 hours ago

Pedophiles and dummies are the two things his whole administration is made up with.

[-] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 hours ago

That's not true, there are also toadies.

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

They generally fall into the dummies category.

this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2026
62 points (93.1% liked)

politics

30592 readers
2409 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS