The United States and Saudi Arabia have carried out coordinated aerial aggression against several bases and weapons depots belonging to Iraq's Popular Mobilization Forces (PMU), also known as Hashd al-Sha’abi.
In separate statements issued early Wednesday, the Saudi defense ministry and the US Central Command announced the joint aggression, saying it targeted bases and weapons storage facilities belonging to the PMU, which serves as a coalition of anti-terror resistance groups.
Turki al-Maliki, spokesperson for the ministry, said the kingdom, in coordination with CENTCOM, had struck specific targets that he claimed had been involved in recent attacks on Saudi oil infrastructure.
CENTCOM also said US and Saudi warplanes had targeted several logistical bases and weapons storage facilities in eastern Iraq.
According to preliminary reports, citing the Iraqi resistance groups, at least 20 fighters were martyred and 32 others were wounded in the attack.
Reports from Iraqi sources, Arab media outlets, and social media users, meanwhile, indicated that multiple locations across Iraq had come under aerial attacks. However, the details of the strikes, as well as the extent of the damage and casualties, have yet to be officially confirmed.
According to those reports, the largest strikes took place in Basra Province, where Hashd al-Sha’abi’s operational headquarters in the al-Dair area and the group's weapons depots were reportedly targeted.
Arab news networks, including al-Hadath, reported multiple airstrikes and injuries to several individuals. Surveillance camera footage circulating online showed explosions in the area. The PMU’s Operations Command in Basra said three airstrikes had struck the vicinity of one of its headquarters and that two missiles landed nearby.
Other reports said bases and weapons depots in the al-Suwaira area of Wasit Province, including the al-Fath al-Mubin base, had also come under attack.
Various sources further reported strikes on positions affiliated with Hashd al-Sha’abi in Babil Province, including locations in Jurf al-Nasr.
Some unverified reports and social media posts also said that positions in the Nineveh Plains, Kirkuk, Karbala, and other parts of eastern Iraq had been targeted.
Resistance had warned Saudi against military aggression
The aggression came, although Iraqi resistance had warned Saudi Arabia earlier this week against waging such strikes against the Iraqi territory following Riyadh's accusations that attacks on some of its oil facilities had originated from Iraq.
In a statement released on Monday, the resistance had rejected the Saudi allegations, describing them as “baseless.”
“These baseless allegations... are nothing more than a transparent attempt by the Saudi regime to cover up its complete failure to respond to the highly effective operations carried out by Yemen's resistance forces against the regime's deeply buried infrastructure,” the statement said.
“We in the Islamic Resistance give a clear warning to the Saudi regime that any foolish action on their part will be confronted with a decisive response that will compel them to feel deep regret,” the statement declared.
The statement urged Saudi authorities to stop blaming Iraq and instead end Riyadh’s blockade on Yemen.
news
Welcome to c/news! We aim to foster a book-club type environment for discussion and critical analysis of the news. Our policy objectives are:
-
To learn about and discuss meaningful news, analysis and perspectives from around the world, with a focus on news outside the Anglosphere and beyond what is normally seen in corporate media (e.g. anti-imperialist, anti-Zionist, Marxist, Indigenous, LGBTQ, people of colour).
-
To encourage community members to contribute commentary and for others to thoughtfully engage with this material.
-
To support healthy and good faith discussion as comrades, sharpening our analytical skills and helping one another better understand geopolitics.
We ask community members to appreciate the uncertainty inherent in critical analysis of current events, the need to constantly learn, and take part in the community with humility. None of us are the One True Leftist, not even you, the reader.
Newcomm and Newsmega Rules:
The Hexbear Code of Conduct and Terms of Service apply here.
-
Link titles: Please use informative link titles. Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.
-
Content warnings: Posts on the newscomm and top-level replies on the newsmega should use content warnings appropriately. Please be thoughtful about wording and triggers when describing awful things in post titles.
-
Fake news: No fake news posts ever, including April 1st. Deliberate fake news posting is a bannable offense. If you mistakenly post fake news the mod team may ask you to delete/modify the post or we may delete it ourselves.
-
Link sources: All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include the Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance) or at least strip out identifier information from the twitter link. There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source.
-
Archive sites: We highly encourage use of non-paywalled archive sites (i.e. archive.is, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org) so that links are widely accessible to the community and so that reactionary sources don’t derive data/ad revenue from Hexbear users. If you see a link without an archive link, please archive it yourself and add it to the thread, ask the OP to fix it, or report to mods. Including text of articles in threads is welcome.
-
Low effort material: Avoid memes/jokes/shitposts in newscomm posts and top-level replies to the newsmega. This kind of content is OK in post replies and in newsmega sub-threads. We encourage the community to balance their contribution of low effort material with effort posts, links to real news/analysis, and meaningful engagement with material posted in the community.
-
American politics: Discussion and effort posts on the (potential) material impacts of American electoral politics is welcome, but the never-ending circus of American Politics© Brought to You by Mountain Dew™ is not welcome. This refers to polling, pundit reactions, electoral horse races, rumors of who might run, etc.
-
Electoralism: Please try to avoid struggle sessions about the value of voting/taking part in the electoral system in the West. c/electoralism is right over there.
-
AI Slop: Don't post AI generated content. Posts about AI race/chip wars/data centers are fine.