top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 98 points 1 month ago (1 child)

PETA is okay with animal cruelty so long as they're the ones doing the cruelty.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 83 points 1 month ago (15 children)

    There was an episode of Penn & Teller: Bullshit! all about PETA. Gives a good overview of what they're really all about.

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 34 points 1 month ago (10 children)

    Yeah they were killing more dogs and cats then kill shelters. Because fucking sociopaths. They don't even believe in pets.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 35 points 1 month ago (8 children)

    They run no rejection animal shelters. Since people in general buy too many pups from breeders other animal shelters have to reject many animals that people neglect and try to get rid of. PETA does not reject any of those that get rejected by other shelters. This means they have a huge overflow of animals that people bring there. Sadly that means euthanizing ones that they do not have the money to support. If you are pro-pets and do not fund PETA to support all the neglected pets it feels a bit hypocritical to criticize them for euthanizing when the problem is that there is too many neglected pets.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    "They like to bite off more than they can chew so of course they have to spit it all over the table"

    I understand, and agree, that the root of the problem is the amount of abandoned animals but I still think that what peta does is wrong. By accepting more animals than they can care for they are robbing those animals the chance to find a shelter that can actually take them in, or someone willing to adopt them, or a temporary foster home, even a life as a stray could be better than death IMO. Euthanasia should only be used as a last resort, I dont think peta is doing enough to exhaust their options and, I reiterate, they are not allowing others to try by pretending to shelter those animals. A no rejection shelter that kills the animals they cant care for is just a regular shelter with extra (and careless) steps.

    If you are pro-pets and do not fund PETA to support all the neglected pets it feels a bit hypocritical to criticize them for euthanizing

    I can barely fund myself

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    If you are pro-pets, don't buy "designer" puppies. Get your animals from a shelter, or from rescues.

    I absolutely adore betta fish, but I sure as hell won't buy one. I don't want to support keeping fish in tiny cups.

    Frankly, what we need is legislation that forces pet stores to ensure that any animal kept with an intent to sell mush be housed and displayed in an appropriate enclosure for it to survive its entire natural life. That way the animals don't suffer if they aren't sold, and people get a good idea of what an actual appropriate setup looks like for that animal. I see too many nightmares on Craigslist and Facebook where people are keeping a 5ft corn snake in a 10 gallon enclosure because that's what the baby corn snake was in at the pet store.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 54 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Show your moral superiority to PETA by going vegan and not making slop.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 41 points 1 month ago* (1 child)

    VEGANS are cool PETA is lame.... PETA is a CIA cutout

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 36 points 1 month ago

    This is consistent with their general scumminess.

  • source
  • [–] 26 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    PETA has always felt like a corporate strategy in the same vein as the oil companies infiltrating green movements and steering them away from nuclear back in the 70's and 80's. Like PETA exists to make Vegans and Vegetarians look bad, imo.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 17 points 1 month ago* (4 children)

    All Vegans, animal lovers, anyone with empathy hates PETA. Fuck PETA.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 16 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    there are so many better vegan orgs than peta. peta is just clickbait for twitter.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 15 points 1 month ago

    Help the animals by boiling the oceans

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 1 month ago (7 children)

    I don't know much about them but I know them because of this stupid poster:

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 13 points 1 month ago (5 children)
    load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 11 points 1 month ago

    I want YOU to shut the fuck up Peta!

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 1 month ago

    Peta sucks anyway

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago

    PETA is the AIPAC of people who want to eat less or no meat.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago (6 children)

    Got it! Becoming an animal tomorrow!

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago

    I'm going to start eating meat again, just out of spite (I'm not actually).

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago

    PETA sucks but surely this has gotta be a false flag

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago

    lol. they're also using the aesthetic of a mormon wife to sell their message. that lady buys 20 pounds of beef a week.

    trust me, i used to live in salt lake city.

  • source
  • [+] 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)
    [–] 6 points 1 month ago

    Who is the MAGA face on the poster? Or is she just an idoru?

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›