632

Oh no?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] flop_leash_973@lemmy.world 9 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

Who cares, he votes for the Republican talking points most of the time anyway. Grow a spine already and make it official.

What he wants is the party to cross the made up line he has drawn in the sand so he can switch affiliation “guilt free” and be able to say “ look they made me do it” when pressed about it.

[-] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago

Who cares, he votes for the Republican talking points most of the time anyway. Grow a spine already and make it official.

but then he couldnt sabotage the democrats from the inside.

[-] Pulsar@lemmy.world 14 points 16 hours ago

Why are Israel issues more relevant than domestic issues affecting millions of Americans?

[-] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 6 points 15 hours ago

Because of legal foreign bribery.

[-] TheStaffmaster@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

to add to this;

The Israel lobby (AIPAC) is funneling Billions of American Tax funds (and European probably as well) to Zionist Conquest Doctrine. These are funds that were/are already being mismanaged through political grifts and corruption, so the fact that it's going toward a repugnant and quite frankly frivolous war of aggression, that is not only threatening to bankrupt not just America but collapse the entire world economic order, I feel it might be a bit of a solid stance to be in opposition to shitheads that support Israel's actions right now.

"Hot take," I know.

"BuT iRaN mIgHt GeT nUuUuUuUkEs!1!!!1!!!!"

At his point I say we should just GIVE them Nukes. FFS, Quit trying to invade Persia!!

[-] busted_Anoose@aussie.zone 1 points 14 hours ago

because they all know who pays them

[-] busted_Anoose@aussie.zone 7 points 14 hours ago

don't let the door hit your fat ass on the way out, genocide loving loser.

[-] sportsjorts@lemmy.zip 10 points 16 hours ago

Get the fuck out you shit head. Please PA do something about this turd!!!!

[-] tacoplease@lemmy.world 10 points 16 hours ago

Senator John Fetterman of the State of Israel demands recognition.

The fact senior US statesmen continue to offer loyalty to a different sovereign state makes you a laughingstock.

[-] savvie@lemmy.zip 4 points 14 hours ago

Please do, Senator Notabetterman

[-] TheStaffmaster@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

Hey, since you're going outside, can you take the trash (other D.I.N.O.s) out with you? MKThXBai!

[-] crispbacon99@lemmy.zip 1 points 13 hours ago

Compromised politician

[-] Microtonal_Banana@lemmy.zip 1 points 13 hours ago

He brings no benefit to the people of Pennsylvania or the democratic party. Bye Felicia.

[-] Almacca@aussie.zone 27 points 1 day ago

Why wait? Just fuck off already.

[-] KiloGex@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

One more reason to oppose Israel. Not that even more reasons are necessary.

[-] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

help him gtfo now

[-] SalmonTractor@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 1 day ago

Go away, nobody likes you.

Stroke made you evil.

[-] Crozekiel@lemmy.zip 16 points 1 day ago

So his threat is basically that he'll likely ruin his chances of holding office ever again if the party doesn't do what he wants? What a weird flex.

[-] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

He’s currently polling at ~19% approval among Pennsylvania democrats, but ~80% with republicans. So if he sticks with democrat party, he has basically no chance of getting reelected. But republicans tend to do a little better in Pennsylvania (or at least, they used to, but Donny’s current term may have changed that,) so he could have a shot at winning reelection if he switches to Republican. Especially since Republicans love “I used to be a Democrat then I got some common sense” types of stories. He could ham it up for republican voters, and would likely do pretty well if he could convince them he has truly switched sides.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 day ago

How would that change anything?

Also, interesting way of saying that you are an agent of another country

[-] Bwaz@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago

He's functionally a Republican anyway. Why spend Dem party campaign mpney on him?

[-] slingstone@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago
[-] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 38 points 1 day ago

The sooner he fucks off the better.

[-] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

He lied to win the election. Fuck him and cutoff his socialized healthcare.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] SaintNectar@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 day ago

Well.. He hasn't really been in the Democratic party before.

Fetterman’s approval ratings in Pennsylvania have fallen to a dismal 19% among Democrats, according to a Quinnipiac poll released Wednesday. That would make it extremely difficult for him to win a Democratic primary if he opts to run for re-election in 2028. His approval rating among Republicans was 77% in the poll, although it’s far from clear whether they would vote for him.

Lol yeah, he has been a DINO for a long time. He co-opted the democrat party to get elected, but never intended to follow party lines. He has pretty consistently voted with Republicans on key issues.

[-] TehWorld@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

It’s debatable whether the stroke caused him to swing conservative, or if he was always a lying asshole. Not that there’s a difference.

[-] unmagical@lemmy.ml 201 points 2 days ago

I mean you basically left the left the moment you had a stroke.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] cmbabul@slrpnk.net 10 points 1 day ago

Shame that stroke wasn’t more severe

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] madcaesar@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

He's been tarnishing the Democrat brand since he arrived.

This MAGA hack needs to be kicked out yesterday and let him caucus with the lunatic right which he loves so much.

[-] FunStuffIsFun@eviltoast.org 16 points 1 day ago
[-] mcv@lemmy.zip 15 points 1 day ago

It doesn't have to become anti-Israel, just anti-genocide. Would that be a deal-breaker for him? (I wouldn't nind seeing him replaced anyway.)

[-] fyzzlefry@retrolemmy.com 45 points 2 days ago
[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Good. Don't let the door hit your back on the way out.

[-] EmilieEasie@fedinsfw.app 130 points 2 days ago
[-] uberdroog@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

I mean the party has really already left him. No sane person who calls themselves a member of the Democratic party would consider him viable.

[-] Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

Who cares what this assbag will do. We know he had a incident (a stroke) where he finally realized he was gonna die one day. Most of us become more human when we face a possibility of death. He had one and became less human.

[-] Heikki2@lemmy.world 71 points 2 days ago

Man. Brain damage did a number of him. Gabby Gifford was shot in the head and didn't turn conservative

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] aarch0x40@piefed.social 104 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Bye 👋 He's essentially a Republican anyhow.

[-] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 20 points 1 day ago

Sounds like a win/win to me.

[-] crusa187@lemmy.ml 91 points 2 days ago

The chances of Dems adopting such a stance are approximately 0. All Fetterman is doing here is proudly proclaiming who he works for.

It’s a shame PA doesn’t allow recall elections for elected officials, and I sincerely hope Pennsylvanians tell Fett to fuck off to Tel Aviv in the ‘28 election.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] SailorFuzz@lemmy.world 86 points 2 days ago

this is why there needs to be a recall mechanism for congress and senators. Dude ran as a Democrat and is now saying "haha, Ima go be a republican now" and all the people who voted for him can do nothing for 6 fucking years.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] blah3166@piefed.social 39 points 2 days ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 4 points 1 day ago

What's he still doing there anyway? Even by middle of the road Democrat standards, he's pretty shit.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2026
632 points (99.1% liked)

politics

30455 readers
2208 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS