495
top 46 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 4 hours ago

I think this man should learn that even looking through gay porn you can sort by categories.

[-] FreddiesLantern@leminal.space 3 points 3 hours ago

Look, I'm against age verification for privacy/democracy purposes. But like, can we have a dialogue pop up that asks whether or not we're ready for this kind of nonsense in our day?

[-] luciferofastora@feddit.org 9 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Tales of Times Forgotten: Just How Gay Were the Ancient Greeks Really?

The gist of it is

  • Ancient Greek gender identity was more of a "scale" of manliness
  • Sexuality was not an identity but a phase
  • The roles of penetrator and penetrated were split along the division of adult male and anyone else
  • An adult man receiving another was taboo
  • Young adult men were expected to court an adolescent lover
  • Adolescent men were to make them work for it (but also ultimately accept their role)
  • Full adults (late twenties) were to take a wife (usually adolescent girls) and stop pursuing boys

Also noteworthy is that preadolescents were off-limits. "Technically, it's ephebophilia" doesn't make it less fucked up, but it's also a distinction I suspect some of the "it was normal in Ancient Greece" chuds to overlook. Paedophilia wasn't acceptable back then either.

Men who courted other adult men were indeed seen as effeminate though. The post got that part right. But so were adults that failed to move on from their half-man phase of courting boys. I suspect those chuds miss that as well.

All in all, Ancient Greek ideas of sexuality don't neatly map onto modern ones, and they sure weren't progressive.

[-] Hueristic_Autistic@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

Don't the Greeks and Roman's have a lot of stereotypical butt jokes made about them?

[-] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 hours ago

Why does Romans get an apostrophe but not Greeks and jokes?

[-] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Also:

####s: plural form

####'s: expresses owner

[-] Remy@lemmy.today 4 points 10 hours ago

What does he means with "ancient homosexuality" vs "feminized homosexuality" ? And then why he even cares about it?

[-] unrealMinotaur@sh.itjust.works 6 points 9 hours ago

There is actually a pretty big gap between ancient and modern ideas of male on male intercourse. It's an interesting rabbit hole to go down if you get the chance.

[-] RichardDegenne@lemmy.zip 5 points 8 hours ago

I'd rather go down a man hole given the conversation we're currently having.

[-] Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it 0 points 5 hours ago

I have a gay friend, that mf jumpscared our GC so many time with photos on instagram of gay man that are more manly than nomad1941_001-35m

[-] Windex007@lemmy.world 4 points 11 hours ago

Hell yah brother noting gay about pounding another dude as long as that dude is super masculine.

[-] SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social 39 points 20 hours ago

Why the fuck do people give that many fucks over how other people fuck? What does it matter?

[-] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 9 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Because some ancient sex manuals written by ancient goat herders said that gay sex is gross, but it also said love thy neighbor, and none of the peasants at that time had the wherewithal to think "hey maybe only one of those things actually makes sense"

Edit: I'm not giving the peasants enough credit - a bunch of them probably did have the wherewithal, but the people in power murdered them for questioning the ancient sex manual, so that stopped that pretty quick

[-] SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social 3 points 12 hours ago

Nah, the ancients didn't give a fuck. Greek, Roman, Egyptian... Love is love and sex is sex

[-] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 hours ago

I'm talking different ancients - the Judeans, Samaritans, Palestinians, etc

[-] SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social 2 points 7 hours ago

Shouldn't have let them write the books. Single God was an error.

[-] Hueristic_Autistic@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

And it's fucked how if you explore more than one religion, faith or spiritual practice you're considered a heretic.

[-] Malyca@lemmy.zip 21 points 19 hours ago

Because they're also gay but can't accept it

[-] gedfromgont@piefed.ca 3 points 9 hours ago

Yep, my heart goes out to @nomad understanding his feelings some day.

[-] jtrek@startrek.website 9 points 19 hours ago

Sometimes it's "reaction formation". They like a thing. That makes them uncomfortable. They instead go hard in the other direction - they hate the thing it's horrible and bad and the worst.

Sometimes they're just... basic, and need the world to fit into simple boxes. Anything else stresses their brain.

[-] roserose56@lemmy.zip 6 points 17 hours ago

Amen to this! Let people be, let people fuck what ever they want.

[-] SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social 11 points 17 hours ago

*In some sensible guardrails, let's exclude kids and maybe dead people, animals and such, you know. But as long as there's consent, I don't give a fuck.

[-] edible_funk@lemmy.world 6 points 16 hours ago
[-] SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social 3 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Captain Jack Harkness? Good example.

If I were the Face of Bo, I wouldn't bother with strange ideas of heterosexuality as well.

[-] rustydrd@sh.itjust.works 11 points 16 hours ago

All tops in ancient Greece. That's how wrestling started.

[-] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 2 points 15 hours ago

We must return to Gachimuchi

[-] 666dollarfootlong@lemmy.world 30 points 21 hours ago

They made homosex woke. Enough said

[-] P00ptart@lemmy.world 4 points 10 hours ago

Ruined the gay sex for the rest of us. Smdh

[-] Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world 47 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Hey now, the ancients were ped erasts, not ped ophiles. The fancy term makes it okay!

(Just don't point out that the difference is that pederasty means same-sex pedophilia. Or do! I wonder how they'd react.)

[-] lyralycan@sh.itjust.works 21 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

How is there another nuanced difference in terminology for sexual attraction to children (that I didn't know yet)

[-] bitwise@lemmy.ca 5 points 15 hours ago

Wait until you see the new PR hotness that is MAP (Minor Attracted Person)

🤢

[-] Laser@feddit.org 15 points 21 hours ago

Eight-year-olds, dude.

[-] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 5 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

What's it called when a man loves a 600-year-old dragon in the body of an 8-year-old?

[-] applebusch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 12 hours ago

loli, which is just more pedophilia

[-] Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world 9 points 21 hours ago

Because that one is mainly used by historians, not pedos trying to move the goalposts so they can pretend they aren't one.

[-] TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today 16 points 20 hours ago

The ancient Greek hate when you feminize the little boys they rape, everyone knows this.

[-] sundray@lemmus.org 20 points 22 hours ago

They must be thinking about Hollywood’s depiction of exaggerated “manly” Spartan homosexuality. They just want to LARP 300 so bad, you guys.

[-] homes@piefed.world 3 points 20 hours ago

Did they actually show any homosexuality in the movie 300?

[-] TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today 12 points 18 hours ago

No, ironically the Spartans in the movie made fun of the Athenians by calling them boy lovers. Which is hilarious considering that Spartan society was way more homosexual than Athenian society.

[-] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 3 points 18 hours ago

I always interpreted it as a Spartan preference for grown men over boys.

Like more Freddie Mercury and less Judy Garland, please.

[-] TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today 3 points 18 hours ago

Idk, maybe if there was even a single reference to Spartan homosexuality then maybe. But Spartans were just depicted as beautiful strong who all loved their beautiful strong wives.

[-] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 4 points 18 hours ago

The subtext speaks louder than the text in 300.

[-] TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today 2 points 17 hours ago

Lol, I think you might be giving it more credit than it deserves. I'm not sure if there is a lot of subtext in the movie 300. The writing in that movie is pretty minimal and straight forward. It's just a shoddy framework for some interesting (for the time) visual effects.

That is unless you think Zack Snyder was purposely creating media that would fascinate future chuds for years to come. Imo it's just the movie your average 14 year old boy would make in the 00s.

[-] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 2 points 17 hours ago

Subtext need not be intentional.

[-] sundray@lemmus.org 2 points 19 hours ago

I couldn't really tell you, I was... distracted.

this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2026
495 points (99.0% liked)

People Twitter

10179 readers
2303 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS