cross-posted from: https://aussie.zone/post/34370513

Anon likes bikes

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 86 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (8 children)

Not only are bikes one of the most efficient forms of transport, they might be the most efficient form of powered locomotion, period. A human being on a bicycle is far more efficient than anything in nature.

ETA: Unless you consider e-bikes a separate category, since they (in some cases?) add regenerative braking on top of everything else.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 48 points 1 month ago (14 children)

    Yes, actually:

    (Besides a 'velomobile', anyway ... which is basically just a bicycle with bodywork for better aerodynamics.)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • load more comments (9 replies)
  • [–] 29 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    e-bikes a separate category, since they add regenerative braking on top of everything else.

    Actually, the vast majority of e-bikes do not have regenerative braking.

    Because on a bike, you don't actually tend to use your brakes very much or very often. And even when you do use the brakes, you're slowing a smaller mass down from a lower speed (compared to cars with regen braking). There's just not much energy there to be harvested from regen braking. Which makes it generally not worth the extra money, weight, and complexity to include a regen braking system.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] 33 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    almost completely unregulated

    Not if the car brains get their way

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 30 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (18 children)

    My wife likes to ride a bike, a lot. The more you get into it, the more expensive it gets. No those bikes and accessories aren't cheap. That thing getting stolen is a serious hit.

    Simple general store ones are cheap, dedicated sports store ones are far from cheap.

    Bicycles are great force multipliers, but legs are true symbol of freedom of movement. More versatile, almost everyone already have those, already using those is the maintenance required to maintain those.

    Though yeah i absolutely can't understand how cars became a symbol of freedom. Those are literally like a ball and chain around your legs.
    The cost of maintenance, car itself and fuel, stress from said fuel price and then getting to sit in a traffic jam overwhelming majority of the time, while trying to memorize huge amount of road rules that many just ignore and which can result in death.

    Yeah sure racetrack driving might be nice or going somewhere really remote, but that's so rare as to be a statistical anomaly, overwhelming majority of the time it's basic everyday driving.

  • source
  • hideshow 23 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    You can cycle a lot without getting into racing bikes though.

    Walking you are going to want shoes. Shoes wear through and actually cost more than a decent regular bike per km.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 child)

    Underrated point. Someone always brings up the cost of bikes in these threads and it's silly. Sure, some hard core cyclists will put $20k into the hobby, but it's not at all necessary.

    I've got maybe $1200 in my total set up, and I could have done it far cheaper if I'd been picky about shopping sales and buying used.

    The bike was around $750 new, $80 for an ergonomic saddle (saves on padded shorts, but YMMV), $60 for a helmet that fits well, $100 for pedals with toe clips so I can wear street shoes, and a few accessories here and there.

    I put in 30-50 miles a week on average and I've had the bike for better than 2 years with no major mechanical issues. I don't know where that puts me in terms of milage over the average cyclist, but I have a great time and get plenty of exercise without breaking the bank.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 22 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    As a note about the "symbology of freedom" when it comes to cars it I think comes down to American centric shit again. When I lived in small town USA where there is nothing to do but meth and everyone knows everyone else's business the dream of packing your shit in a backpack and getting into the car and driving 4 hours away feels like freedom. You can go to a city or town and get away from it all.

    Now you can do the same in Europe on a train but that won't sell cars so....

    You can even see it in American car ads. There are two kinds of cars - the commuter, which focuses on luxury and style, and the "get away from your life" car, the SUVs you stick your camping gear in and go to the middle of nowhere to get away from your shitty life and experience nature in.

    Cars are a symbol of freedom because there is no transportation options, so not having one feels like prison

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 13 points 1 month ago* (1 child)

    Like most any hobby, you can spend as much on it as you like. But the bike coop in your city will probably sell a perfectly-serviceable used commuter to you on a need-based sliding scale all the way down to $20, if not totally free.

    As for legs... They're nice, but I've ridden my bicycle 110+ miles in like 8 hours. That's a massive quantitative difference, and a huge impact on quality of life for someone who needs to get around.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (13 replies)
    [–] 27 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

    I recently saw a scatter plot somewhere, I believe it was speed vs energy efficiency or something body weight vs cost of transport. And all animals, as well as most modes of transport follow a roughly anti-proportional relationship on a log-scale. If you're fast heavy, you use a lot of energy. If I remember it right, the fastest most efficient animal was the salmon (?). There was one single outlier from that trend, an animal that is much too fast and much too efficient for its weight at the same time: Human on a bike.

    Edit: Found it: https://slowrevealgraphs.com/2025/12/31/a-human-on-a-bicycle-is-among-the-most-efficient-forms-of-travel/

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Too bad trains and boats are missing from the graph.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 21 points 1 month ago (1 child)
    load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 20 points 1 month ago

    cars require roads for the most part and that's a socialized freedom boats would be a better symbol of freedom

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 1 month ago (7 children)

    Air conditioning.

    Air conditioning is why the car is so popular.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 month ago

    It's all kinds of comfort. Comfort to only walk a little when you arrive. Comfort of being "safe" while others are endangered (by you). Comfort of only pushing a pedal with minimal force, instead of propelling yourself. Comfort of having all your shit with you, like a miniture house/oversized backpack. Comfort of keeping a distance to others, being able to hide all you flaws with your carry-on personal space while othering everybody else. Comfort of being sheltered from environment while driving (+ AC), actively worsening the environment.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 9 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Answer: freedom without effort is more freedom than freedom with effort. If that difference was small, nobody would put up with all the negative effects of cars

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 8 points 1 month ago*

    Also the transmission lasts between 2 years and forever. Probably also depends on how aggressively you use it.

    Well, the bicycle I use now is actually somewhat decent unlike the one I had as a child (so maybe that's why it doesn't have many problems).

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›