▲ 603 ▼ [meme] Anon likes bikes (thelemmy.club) submitted 1 month ago by Danquebec@sh.itjust.works to c/fuckcars@lemmy.world 156 comments fedilink hide all child comments cross-posted from: https://aussie.zone/post/34370513 Anon likes bikes
[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 48 points 1 month ago (8 children) Yes, actually: (Besides a 'velomobile', anyway ... which is basically just a bicycle with bodywork for better aerodynamics.) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 16 child comments replies: [–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 53 points 1 month ago* Death sentence to whoever chose to animate a fake scatter plot over this thing. And yeah velomobiles are just speed-optimized bicycles. permalink fedilink source parent [–] saltnotsugar@lemmy.world 26 points 1 month ago (1 child) Finally a graph that dares to compare cows and jet fighters! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 11 points 1 month ago Probably not the only graph that does so. Both are relevant sources of greenhouse gas emissions as well, so they probably share some graphs on the topic of climate change. permalink fedilink source parent [–] MoffKalast@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago Mice should be ashamed of their inefficiency. permalink fedilink source parent [–] StarvingMartist@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 month ago Now if we could just get a salmon on a velomobile permalink fedilink source parent [–] buffing_lecturer@leminal.space 8 points 1 month ago (1 child) This is so cool. Why do I intuitively expect the efficiency should increase with the Y axis instead through? It feels somewhat upside down? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] zaphod@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 month ago The Y axis is cost of transport, low cost = high efficiency. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 month ago (1 child) Velomobile looks like fun but they cost so much. Seems like they are typically custom built and use carbon fibre. So several thousand or more. Meanwhile my bike was like £600. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] BranBucket@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago (1 child) I wonder if you could produce fairing kits for common recumbent bikes and split the difference. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 1 point 1 month ago I think it's because they are made in such small volumes. Shame, as they look cool. permalink fedilink source parent [–] tuxiqae@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago Correct me if I'm wrong, but I assume that the main upside of a velomobile is removing the un-aerodynamicality of the human on it Which makes me wonder whether a bike without a biker will be more aerodynamic than a velomobile permalink fedilink source parent [–] applebusch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 1 month ago (2 children) curious where lighter than air vehicles and trains end up on there permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] MoffKalast@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago Blimp efficiency depends on size, a big one would be on the bottom right. But then some wind would send it tumbling around and it would crash into Jet transport and Horse, rapidly disintegrating as it pulverizes Human on a velomobile against the bottom axis. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 month ago (1 child) Same as sailing ships I suppose, if you are just using the wind like a hot air balloon anyway. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 3 points 1 month ago (1 child) It would be very difficult to measure how much energy (in calories) a sailing ship is using in order to move. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] grue@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago The notion of "fuel efficiency" kinda stops making sense for a sailboat. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 53 points 1 month ago* Death sentence to whoever chose to animate a fake scatter plot over this thing. And yeah velomobiles are just speed-optimized bicycles. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] saltnotsugar@lemmy.world 26 points 1 month ago (1 child) Finally a graph that dares to compare cows and jet fighters! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 11 points 1 month ago Probably not the only graph that does so. Both are relevant sources of greenhouse gas emissions as well, so they probably share some graphs on the topic of climate change. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 11 points 1 month ago Probably not the only graph that does so. Both are relevant sources of greenhouse gas emissions as well, so they probably share some graphs on the topic of climate change. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] MoffKalast@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago Mice should be ashamed of their inefficiency. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] StarvingMartist@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 month ago Now if we could just get a salmon on a velomobile permalink fedilink source parent
[–] buffing_lecturer@leminal.space 8 points 1 month ago (1 child) This is so cool. Why do I intuitively expect the efficiency should increase with the Y axis instead through? It feels somewhat upside down? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] zaphod@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 month ago The Y axis is cost of transport, low cost = high efficiency. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] zaphod@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 month ago The Y axis is cost of transport, low cost = high efficiency. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 month ago (1 child) Velomobile looks like fun but they cost so much. Seems like they are typically custom built and use carbon fibre. So several thousand or more. Meanwhile my bike was like £600. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] BranBucket@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago (1 child) I wonder if you could produce fairing kits for common recumbent bikes and split the difference. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 1 point 1 month ago I think it's because they are made in such small volumes. Shame, as they look cool. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] BranBucket@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago (1 child) I wonder if you could produce fairing kits for common recumbent bikes and split the difference. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 1 point 1 month ago I think it's because they are made in such small volumes. Shame, as they look cool. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 1 point 1 month ago I think it's because they are made in such small volumes. Shame, as they look cool. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] tuxiqae@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago Correct me if I'm wrong, but I assume that the main upside of a velomobile is removing the un-aerodynamicality of the human on it Which makes me wonder whether a bike without a biker will be more aerodynamic than a velomobile permalink fedilink source parent
[–] applebusch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 1 month ago (2 children) curious where lighter than air vehicles and trains end up on there permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] MoffKalast@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago Blimp efficiency depends on size, a big one would be on the bottom right. But then some wind would send it tumbling around and it would crash into Jet transport and Horse, rapidly disintegrating as it pulverizes Human on a velomobile against the bottom axis. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 month ago (1 child) Same as sailing ships I suppose, if you are just using the wind like a hot air balloon anyway. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 3 points 1 month ago (1 child) It would be very difficult to measure how much energy (in calories) a sailing ship is using in order to move. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] grue@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago The notion of "fuel efficiency" kinda stops making sense for a sailboat. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] MoffKalast@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago Blimp efficiency depends on size, a big one would be on the bottom right. But then some wind would send it tumbling around and it would crash into Jet transport and Horse, rapidly disintegrating as it pulverizes Human on a velomobile against the bottom axis. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 month ago (1 child) Same as sailing ships I suppose, if you are just using the wind like a hot air balloon anyway. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 3 points 1 month ago (1 child) It would be very difficult to measure how much energy (in calories) a sailing ship is using in order to move. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] grue@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago The notion of "fuel efficiency" kinda stops making sense for a sailboat. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 3 points 1 month ago (1 child) It would be very difficult to measure how much energy (in calories) a sailing ship is using in order to move. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] grue@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago The notion of "fuel efficiency" kinda stops making sense for a sailboat. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] grue@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago The notion of "fuel efficiency" kinda stops making sense for a sailboat. permalink fedilink source parent