And they achieved... what exactly?
More faces per book? Instant Instagram? Whatsapp is now appier? Finally copied Second Life in meta horizons?
Like... What does $221,000,000/month of AI even get you?
And they achieved... what exactly?
More faces per book? Instant Instagram? Whatsapp is now appier? Finally copied Second Life in meta horizons?
Like... What does $221,000,000/month of AI even get you?
Is that cost in electricity cost? Or they are not using their own AI models?
Their models suck, if they didn’t they’d sell them.
Edit to add: they’re selling access to their GPUs, that’s how bad and under used their models are. Again, if their own models were any good, someone would use them.
They have their own models, it depends on a teams manager and a few other constraints if they are required to use them or if they are pestered to use generative models at all.
I'm betting that cost is just the cost for the token usage and nothing else.
im required to use ai at my job. they don't pay attention to what i do with it. so it now answers my emails 1 business day after i receive them, and responds (appropriately) that im working on their request and ill check back in with them with progress. its a constant loop.
its funny how many tasks in corporate america get forgotten bc they weren't executed immediately :D
corporate elsewhere too. it's all for The Metrics, to see usage and adaptation go up. i'm not required to use it at work, but our developers are.
let's just say clients are increasingly choosing the (worse) fallback browser version of our service instead of the vibecoded and more and more broken app full of vulnerabilities. because at least the browser side has issues they expect and usually know by now.
but hey, new graph go up, right? ignore the old graph we cared about before.
my fav is the fact that our dev team is use 80% of the companys ai tokens, but have to push to production at least four times bc of bug fixes. every week. we used to publish once, maybe twice.
somehow this is better?
Zuck the Fuck has proved time and again that he is completely bankrupt of ideas or vision.
... and I'll stop there because that list is endless, seemingly.
Things he actually did himself under his own "vision" such as it is?:
Now he's going to tout his new direction of AI, but ... ah ... that's all purchased too:
The dude is creatively and morally bankrupt, and at the rate he's burning cash in this latest corporate turn, he'll be fiscally bankrupt in no time flat as well. Zuck the Fuck is like Melon Husk Lite: All the idiocy, half the cash.
Cant be creative if you have no soul.
Imagine you have to go on with a company name that is the worst failure in your company's history? Every time you say the company name, you are referencing what a loser you are.
the metaverse
But did you see the legs? Impressive.
Surprisingly difficult to find a source on this that isn't a Twitter Screenshot of some right-wing grifter's account.
This seems to be it, but I don't think there's currently a working paywall bypass for the information (solid site, though).
https://mlq.ai/news/meta-caps-internal-ai-token-spending-after-costs-approach-billions-in-2026/
This might be that article, but not entirely sure. Ironically, that site seems to be another questionable AI project.
It would be so funny if meta was to go broke over AI usage. One can dream
I'd like to join the chorus of people saying "Zuckerberg will be bankrupt soon", but I said the same thing about Musk and he became a trillionaire
People will continue to use his dumb products, not in the least cause he does his best to monopolize any market he's in
I hope Cuckerberg is bankrupt at the end of this AI clusterfuck.
and that is not even the actual cost, because the vendors are still not making a profit.
Observe the dead-eyed stare into the middle distance.
He almost looks human in that photo.
Is this whole token thing really just the same as paid in-game currencies, just designed to get you to not think about the fact that you’re spending money? Or is there another use for it?
Tokens are an AI context of units of text. Could be a character or a word. Why use the term tokens instead of words? Who knows. Maybe because some units aren’t words? The tech industry delights in creating stupid terms for things that already had terms.
A token can range from individual letters to several words in a stock phrase, from what little I understand. It's a piece of whatever they're doing behind the scenes leaking into the public-facing terminology.
According to my SO, it's safe enough to just say "a token is a word" as long as you remember this is only an approximation.
There are to many words to have each be it's own input, but bundling frequently used snippets is more efficient than using characters.
Then the investors came and decided to measure success by wasted energy and the rest is history.
Tokens are pretty much the compute used for one word, approximately, or some other information of a similar size. (Long words are two or three tokens each actually)
Then, yes those tokens are paid for with "credits" which is them gamifying the purchase lol
And the marketplace search is still a broken pile of shit...wish everyone didn't jump to it and stayed on CL...
I'm sure making Instagram clog my feed with suggested posts and other shit I don't follow has done wonders for their engagement metrics. I really love how meme posts and other shares are now clogging that shit up as well.
It's definitely not a main contributor to what made me finally delete my Facebook. Kind of ironic that, given how much of my data they scrape, they still couldn't piece that together.
top 50 comments