1203
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] OldSageRick@lemmy.zip 123 points 2 weeks ago

I still remember how a colleague told me we should do X.

I was bamboozeled and baffled by it because X was literally what it said on the flask of the chemical what you shoulf not do under any circumstances.

His explanation as to why we should was, quote "I mean I know its strange, but Copilot told me it is okay and would be fine"

[-] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 94 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

"well, you're the expert. I'll be behind this sealed barrier while you kill yourself"

Disclaimer: don't do this. Letting your coworkers die is morally bad, and probably illegal.

[-] OldSageRick@lemmy.zip 70 points 2 weeks ago

Even worse, it involves a lot of paperwork.

What you do is send an official complaint straight to the legal office who will lose their shit at that

[-] ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 32 points 2 weeks ago

*who will put the complaint into another LLM and it'll say there's no problem

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Phantaloons@piefed.zip 13 points 2 weeks ago

I get a chill reading any historical nonfiction from the 1990s that is in any way optimistic.

"look how far we've come, into the new millenium!"

ehhhh... oh boy.

[-] BurgerBaron@quokk.au 24 points 2 weeks ago

If we thought outsourcing thinking to religions was bad, hoo boy. This shit is next level.

[-] prex@aussie.zone 16 points 2 weeks ago

When the boss pulls this on you and you ask for it in writing only to tell them: "I'm still not going to do it but now I have a written instruction from you to do something suicidally reckless”

If I wanted to know what a chatbot says, I would have asked it myself.

[-] turbowafflz@lemmy.world 71 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

A couple days ago I heard the horrifying sentence "I asked chatgpt to generate a secure password for the laptops" from someone returning a cart full of laptops they borrowed. Does your browser not have a built in password generator? Does your password manager not have a built in password generator? Could you not find a single password generator online?

[-] tiramichu@sh.itjust.works 53 points 2 weeks ago

And of course not only is that unnecessary, but insecure since your password is immediately in the chatgpt logs

[-] Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it 39 points 2 weeks ago

And it's not even a random or strong password! LLMs can't randomly generate 'em

[-] AmbitiousProcess@piefed.social 25 points 2 weeks ago

I asked ChatGPT (I use a third-party frontend, so I don't have a paid subscription. API prices mean they probably got paid like one cent for this, if that.) "Generate a list of 10 secure passwords." like 5 times and it regularly re-used the words Saffron, Comet, Marigold, Harbor, Lynx, and Cobalt multiple times across all of them, sometimes even inside the same list.

There was also a theme of using names for animals and natural geographic/geological features.

Oh, and for one of the passwords it genuinely just said "raven" and nothing else 😭

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] recklessengagement@lemmy.world 59 points 2 weeks ago

Ugh. I once heard someone say "I did a chat" as slang for "asking ChatGPT". It was a software vendor on a call regarding compatibility with our existing systems. We had concerns it wasn't. They insisted it was, because they "did a chat" and ChatGPT said it was.

It wasn't.

[-] derpgon@programming.dev 40 points 2 weeks ago

I vibe questioned, and got vibe answered 🌟

[-] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 24 points 2 weeks ago

Should have gotten them to verify in writing they guaranteed it was compatible and then sued them for it lol

[-] applebusch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 54 points 2 weeks ago

what about "chatgpt says copy paste of LLM output"?

might as well be a fucking bot

[-] Klear@piefed.world 24 points 2 weeks ago

I got a worse one. copy paste of LLM output without any mention of the source...

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Hexarei@beehaw.org 46 points 2 weeks ago

Don't ask chatgpt, I can tell you bullshit too and I'm beautiful

[-] Septimaeus@infosec.pub 15 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Dig this energy. Shine on.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] hildegarde@lemmy.blahaj.zone 46 points 2 weeks ago

I can barely use the internet anymore. I have to filter by date to get results from before 2024. Otherwise all the results are obvious AI trash.

When I tried to look up information about storing film negatives. Pretty obscure niche topic these days. The top pre-2024 result was from a well respected national archive, good informative page written by experts in the field.

By contrast, the current day results were an endless sea of random websites who all by sheer coincidence decided to start writing about film archival in the year 2025.

[-] Smorty@lemmy.blahaj.zone 42 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

by now, saying "i did a search" and actually having done a search and found stuff AND shared the link feels like a "good skill to have" again.

my brother (14 y/ooooo sooooooo skibidi) uses mister gpt for all web searching which sucks big time. whenever he does use a real life search engine, hes surprised by the amount of stuff he finds by now.

EDIT: fixed some typos...

[-] Rooster326@programming.dev 21 points 2 weeks ago

It would be a "good skill to have" if they haven't actively been making search engines worse, so they can make AI look better.

How the fuck could AskJeeves from 20 years ago work better than search engines of today?

[-] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 26 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

It’s not just them, it’s the SEO spam gaming the system.

AskJeeves would be utterly horrendous today because the web of its time is no longer feasible.


And who is the center cog of this ad-driven SEO apocalypse? Who runs basically all web advertising?

Well… Google, of course.

[-] Smorty@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 2 weeks ago

i believe search engines have been degrading prior to the LMs but might be misremembering...

[-] antonim@lemmy.world 18 points 2 weeks ago

No, I agree. One indicative moment was when Google stopped showing the "X million results found" and the results ended after 10-15 pages even when the keywords should have millions of results. This was noticed back in 2021.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] uncommoncorvid@piefed.blahaj.zone 42 points 2 weeks ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 36 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Eh.

It’s in the same ballpark as “my buddy said this while we were high” or “my uncle posted this on Facebook” or “I saw this YouTube video…”

It turns out people, on average, have horrible information hygiene and little incentive to consider this. ChatGPT just made Facebook Uncle Facts more personalized and accessible, unfortunately.

[-] Gorilladrums@lemmy.world 19 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

People on Lemmy also have horrid information hygiene that's just as bad even though a lot of people here like to pretend that they're better than everyone.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] replicat@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago

No, because "my uncle" didn't post a 6 paragraph essay that no one has ever read, but you are now expected to read.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 34 points 2 weeks ago

I work in municipal development, and we have people trying to turn in building plans designed by AI. And the AI even puts in real-looking Engineering and Architectural seals. I really don't love that I have to verify seals these days.

Our team is made up of hyper-vigilant bureaucrats, but lots of cites have worn out people who stopped caring if it looked mostly right, and people are going to die when buildings start collapsing.

[-] MartianRecon@lemmus.org 18 points 2 weeks ago

AI is not trustworthy. A friend of mine literally put Warhammer 40,000's rules and codexes into an AI so we could ask it questions and use it as a fast check rules tool.

It gets shit wrong a bunch.

So if the fucking thing can't do a simple data-check on a 60 page document regarding a fucking boardgame, how the hell is it supposed to do 'real' things?

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] bfg9k@lemmy.world 27 points 2 weeks ago
[-] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

That sentence is a self-issued Certificate Of Stupidity.

[-] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 22 points 2 weeks ago

I wish i could tell these people my honest thoughts about their idiocy but that would cause... issues...

[-] BioDriver@lemmy.world 18 points 2 weeks ago

I got a promotion for saying my thoughts and bringing receipts/studies. Turns out my promotion was so I could play devil’s advocate so the AI teams could make their processes and models’ messaging stronger against criticism. Anyone hiring?

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] froufox@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 2 weeks ago

"i asked chatgpt to calculate..."

[-] JimVanDeventer@lemmy.world 21 points 2 weeks ago

Being accused of using ChatGPT for the crime of knowing how to properly use em dashes is far more infuriating.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 18 points 2 weeks ago

I asked chatGPT to fuck off

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] lost_faith@lemmy.ca 16 points 2 weeks ago

Off topic: If said in french "ChatGPT" translates back to "Cat, I farted" - you're welcome

[-] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 16 points 2 weeks ago

I had an Uber passenger that straight up said,"well I asked grok about restaurants around here..."

Like no infuriation, as much as pity.

[-] skisnow@lemmy.ca 15 points 2 weeks ago

I'm increasingly seeing this used as a disclaimer, as in, "don't trust what I'm about to say; I went with the source that's 90% useless because when I Googled it the search results were 100% useless".

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] svcg@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 2 weeks ago

You claim there is no more infuriating sentence, and yet I put this to you:

"I asked grok"

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Rooskie91@discuss.online 13 points 2 weeks ago

"I ask ChatGPT" is the "I consulted the Oracle of Delphi" of our time.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2026
1203 points (98.6% liked)

196

6474 readers
1948 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS