They only insinuated he hasn't met the criteria under international law yet

Hell, if you go COMPLETELY literal, they're not even necessarily saying THAT!

They COULD be saying that the Tates are legitimate targets for OTHER reasons (such as being in the enemy's army), just not for being assholes 😉

Honestly even before finishing training. He's wearing the military uniform, training, and handling a weapon.

The US defined any male about 16 in Iraq as a combatant/legitimate target and the world didn't bat an eye. Tate exceeds this

“I’m condemned to use the tools of my enemy to defeat them. I burn my decency for someone else’s future. I burn my life to make a sunrise that I know I’ll never see.”

That definitely looks like an invasive species of flora he's standing near...

Would be doing them a favor, really.

Ukraine's support from other countries relies heavily on them having and maintaining the moral high ground.

Well Ukraine ain't the US

"Less blatantly unethical than the US" is not that high a bar, to be fair.

The Trump administration, the Biden administration, the Obama administration, the Bush administration.. You get the picture.

Just one time, as a lil treat...

Nothing should be punishable by death. Death penalty is uncivilized and full of problems.

America would lose half the presidential administration.

Which is fine by me, BTW.