109

The former US first lady told CBS News that she was frightened by Joe Biden's performance against Donald Trump.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] brem@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

My husband was having a stroke

Orange man made husband a joke

Cognitive test, I say this in jest

Fuck me our system is broken

[-] kescusay@lemmy.world 67 points 5 days ago

Understandable. He was apparently very sick that day, and obviously also very old.

Still wish he was president instead of the shit-gibbon, though.

[-] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 18 points 5 days ago

Apparently he has a speech pathology problem too (a stutter), which he trains himself out of... And according to Wikipedia:

Biden has a reputation for being prone to gaffes.[833][834][835]

load more comments (14 replies)
[-] MoogleMaestro@lemmy.zip 53 points 5 days ago

I thought I was having a stroke during the 2024 debate. It went that badly.

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

IIIIIII beeeeeeeaaat Medddicccaaaare!!!

[-] ikidd@lemmy.dbzer0.com 48 points 5 days ago

So glad Joe and his handlers felt he should run for a second term.

That decision just worked out fabulously. So happy about it.

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago

Lets just notice and remember how many people here were not only cheerleading the decision, but literally demanding that he run. They were telling us we were crazy to not want the incumbent to run.

[-] ikidd@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 5 days ago

I took a lot of abuse when I was calling for him to step down when it was fucking obvious he was going to get trounced. Harris was a shit choice but she still did way better than he would have.

DNC snatching defeat from the jaws of victory as usual. They're complicit.

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 9 points 5 days ago

If Harris was going to be the candidate she needed to face a robust primary, like any Democrat should. It's not just about understanding the candidate but about forcing them to be better in hard positions.

Harris was garbo in the 2020 primary. Did she even get a single delegate?

Even with that, Harris could have easily won if she would have ignored blue Maga and the third way crowd. If she would have let Walz be Walz. If she would have leaned into being the party of the left instead of trying to be diet republican.

[-] Upgrayedd1776@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago

still do get a lot of abuse, some chode above in this thread is still saying we all misremembered and it was a slight gaffe that had been there all along

[-] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago

Fucker knew he had uncureable cancer and still fucking ran. If he just done as he promised an only did the one term. We could had a primary and maybe had a candidate that would got people out to vote.

Of course Trump as admitted as much that all the machines in key states were rigged in his favor. So we might still loss. But at least we had a chance. Instead he tried and fail and thought they could just stick us with Harris. And goddammit she could have won if she shifted from Israel and fought for progressive vote instead of pivoting right instead.

[-] Furbag@pawb.social 3 points 3 days ago

Of course Trump as admitted as much that all the machines in key states were rigged in his favor.

Thank you for saying this. I feel like sometimes I am the only person in the world who remembers that Trump said out loud that Musk "knows about voting machines better than anybody". Like, isn't that suspicious? I understand that the Democrats ran a bad campaign, but to lose in every single swing state after Trump had already been president once and was grossly unpopular at the end of his first term, there has to be something more to it than just her stance on Israel/Gaza and not running a primary.

And of course, the Dems take the high road and don't demand investigations so that they avoid comparisons to election deniers on the right that ceaselessly parroted baseless conspiracies throughout Biden's term. Almost as if it was planned all along...

I want to believe that my fellow Americans aren't collectively stupid enough to actually pick Trump a second time. I really, really want to believe.

[-] backalleycoyote@lemmy.today 3 points 5 days ago

Me to young voters trying to decide which senior citizen with one foot in the grave they have to decide between:

[-] PlasticExistence@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

Power is the ultimate drug

load more comments (16 replies)
[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 44 points 5 days ago

Us too Jill. Us too.

[-] oakey66@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

We also thought he was stroking out.

[-] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

We all knew he had a speech impediment. He could have probably skipped the debate outright and said I don't debate people who commit treason and come out on top more likely. For all the shade he caught, his administration was doing good things, and I was worried he would bomb the debate, and boy did he. As I was watching it, I said to my friend they are going to demand he steps down now, and Trump is going to win against whoever they shoehorn in. Sure enough, here we are. So great, so again.

[-] SGGeorwell@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

Fuck her, according to reporting from Jake Tapper (I know, I know) she was one of the main people keeping Joe under wraps to avoid scrutiny. She’s a contemptible villain. She brought us Donald Trump.

[-] artyom@piefed.social 2 points 5 days ago

I thought he was having a stroke for 4 years

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 27 May 2026
109 points (91.6% liked)

politics

29932 readers
2212 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS