95% accuracy? I am sorry but that means it's wrong 1 time out of 20 and that seems bad.
I wish the article elaborated more on this but it appears that "Accuracy" in the exoskeleton industry tends to be a measure of:
-
how long the device takes to start moving along with its wearer, measured in miliseconds
-
where the device stops vs where it was meant to stop, i.e. if you lower your arm 45° but the exoskeleton follows along for 44°
-
wether or not a "movement intention" is detected at all, the industry seems to have mastered this for a while now
If I had to guess, the "95%" probably refers to the second measure, which sounds pretty good for a device that helps with lifting, carrying, and gross motor skill stuff.
Finally, a no-loads-refused exoskeleton for the people. 😤
I found a YouTube link in your post. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:
Sino
This is a comm for news, information, and discussion on anything China and Chinese related.
Rules:
-
Imperialism will result in a ban.
-
Sinophobic content will be removed.