this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2023
233 points (97.9% liked)

politics

19126 readers
3200 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Rep. Clay Higgins, R-La., during a Homeland Security Committee hearing on Wednesday accused the FBI of secret involvement in the January 6 attack. Higgins during the hearing with FBI Director Christopher Wray cited their exchange from a previous hearing. "I asked you, ‘Did you have confidential human sources dressed as Trump supporters positioned inside the Capitol on January 6, prior to the doors being open?’ You responded. I quote again, ‘I have to be very careful of what I say,’" Higgins recalled, arguing that "we can't get a straight answer" despite a "tremendous amount of evidence."

all 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 83 points 1 year ago (3 children)

How the hell does a nation even dig itself out of this disinformation / conspiracy theory rat hole?

This shit is so depressing.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Get money out of politics. Nothing will fundamentally change until we accomplish this.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I think this is the rather depressing truth.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago

For starters, stop treating these people as serious people, regardless of position or economic/political standing. This clowns and his kind should have their mics automatically cut off and all interviews immediately ended the moment they start bringing this shit up with any level of seriousness. We have to stop treating them as sane people with valuable opinions worthy of attention the moment they start spouting fucking reality denying nonsense like the mental patients they are.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

I think it will have to be a long coordinated fight and grass roots involvement. There is a lot to fix.

[–] Birdie 60 points 1 year ago (2 children)

He is nothing but an embarrassment to Louisiana. His FB page is filled with what sounds like drunken rantings.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Just a quick question, how would one go about embarrassing Louisiana? Seems like a tall order...

[–] Birdie 13 points 1 year ago

It would be very very hard, but Rep Higgins certainly makes it look easy.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Watch Senator Kennedy, take notes.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I often think House seats should be smaller, there used to be 33k people per district, now it's over 700k.

But fewer people per district would make for some idiosyncrasies and guys like this make me think we have enough weirdos in the House as is.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A sizable reason for the current state of eccentric weirdos in the House is the Gerrymandering happening all over the place. Makes it way easier to win based on notoriety and the letter next to your name alone.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Op’s solution would fix that

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

It can help. But smaller districts can still be gerrymandered.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

It's harder and less effective with more districts, however.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Fair enough, but there would be vanishing small returns because math.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think it would balance out because those idiots might be more numerous, but they would have less power. So maybe a few Representatives would be looney, but they wouldn't be able to get much done against the even larger ranks of sane members.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

and then you discover... all the other loonies that get elected, too.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I agree, but we'd have to restructure how the House does business.

The current count of Representatives is 435. If we were to go back to old ratios at 30k, we'd have 11,300 Representatives.

We'd have to break it up into smaller, constituent houses, or something.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

Too many people to bribe

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

If we went back to 210k people per Rep it's about 1555. 210k is the ratio last time apportionment was done in 1912 or something like that.

The math isn't the point though. Republicans won't budge regardless because any increase damages their inherent advantage.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Conservatives should love this, as it's part of the Original plan right?

Uncap the house. More reps = less power per rep.

I will ALWAYS err on the side of diluting power. Always, All ways.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fucking traitor and psycho

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

That’s like 99.9999999% of all repubs.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

There are lots of these angry, stupid people. Some of them are at high levels of government--for example Clay Higgins. Democracy in the United States is in grave danger. Millions of Americans have abandoned reality and want bloody revenge on their perceived enemies.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

Christ, what a shitweasel

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

“I asked you, ‘Did you have confidential human sources dressed as Trump supporters positioned inside the Capitol on January 6, prior to the doors being open?’ You responded. I quote again, ‘I have to be very careful of what I say,’”

I'm going to guess Higgins has never heard of the term "ongoing federal investigations". If, for example, the feds are currently investigating the Proud Boys, Wray answering that question would put those investigations at risk and possibly risk exposing any undercover investigators that are on the case. Even his statement of "I have to be very careful of what I say" is all but an admission that at the very least, some kind of investigation is going on.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

🎶 Your recent lie

Didn't go your way

Who you gonna blame?

Ghost buses!🎶

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Another republicunt trying to convince me that I’m the idiot. No, fuck you. I have eyes in my head and I am able to observe and accept physical reality. Fuck off and die.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command."

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

When you absolutely, positively have to have an insurrection on short notice, who you gonna call?