214
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] GuyIncognito@lemmy.ca 6 points 55 minutes ago

Insurance, private utilities, the internet, phones, etc.

[-] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 21 minutes ago
[-] GarboDog@lemmy.world 15 points 2 hours ago
[-] greendog@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

I agree, Big Glass has it out for us

[-] elbiter@lemmy.world 8 points 2 hours ago
[-] Zetta@mander.xyz 9 points 3 hours ago

Most contractors or companies providing services related to home maintenance/improvement. I guess it's not really a 'scam' but you are getting charged 10x+ the cost to do whatever when you could probably do it yourself with some research and persistence.

[-] sunbeam60@feddit.uk 12 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Car finance. It’s so prevalent, I think I’m literally the only one on our road that doesn’t drive a 1 year old, brand new, financed car. Literally everyone is like “but it’s only $499/month and I can just hand it back when I want a new one”. Well shit, yes, but try tallying up what you’ve paid for running all these new cars every three years.

Save up instead and continue saving after you bought the car. Then you can afford a different car later.

[-] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 hours ago

They call it "leasing", but get angry when you point out they are renting.

[-] nomugisan@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 hours ago

Save up instead and continue saving after you bought the car. Then you can afford a different car later.

[-] PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk 1 points 22 minutes ago

Take out a loan then, at least at the end of it you still have a car

[-] sunbeam60@feddit.uk 1 points 35 minutes ago

Yes I get the point but I guess it depends on you considering a car a luxury or a requirement. Where I live, it’s definitely a luxury - we’ve got great public transport.

[-] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 4 points 3 hours ago

It's literally like renting a car at $499 per month. Nothing really wrong with that as long as the economics work out (there's more expenses than just the monthly payment), because a car is going to depreciate anyway. You can buy it, but it will just get old and fall apart.

Some people feel it's worth $500 a month to always drive a relatively new car, rather than drive an old car for free.

[-] JamesTBagg@lemmy.world 1 points 37 minutes ago

It's going to depreciate!? Oh no! Often the people I hear talk about cars like that can't or don't change their oil. Change the fluids, rotate the tires, follow servicing time tables; same things you should be doing with your rented car you continue doing with your older car.

[-] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 1 points 25 minutes ago

Obviously, you can maintain your old car, and make it last a long time, but it's still going to look older, maybe dented and scratched, the finish is dull, the interior is worn, etc. Some people don't want to go through all the maintenance, and would rather just pay to have a nice looking reliable car in the driveway.

I've never been a car guy, so I like an older, paid off car, but I understand why some people would want to follow the other strategy.

[-] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 hours ago

Some people feel it’s worth $500 a month to always drive a relatively new car, rather than drive an old car for free.

Some people are broke ass in debt their whole lives.

[-] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 1 points 42 minutes ago

Yeah, I'm not saying it's economically wise, but it's true, and who are we to judge what people prioritize in their lives?

[-] gergolippai@lemmy.world 14 points 8 hours ago

basically everything,i guess.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 12 points 9 hours ago

Banks.
Using YOUR money to make a lot of money from investing in horrible companies.

[-] BorgDrone@feddit.nl 11 points 8 hours ago

Not just investing. Every time banks loan money to someone they steal from everyone.

Fractional reserve banking means that banks only need to have a fraction of the money their customers have in accounts actually in reserve, based on the idea that not everyone will withdraw all their money from the bank at the same time. For example, if people have deposited €1000 at a bank, the bank may be allowed to have €1500 is customers’ accounts, because only a fraction needs to be covered by actual money. The rest is just entries in a database.

Because of the difference between what was deposited and what they are allowed to have as ‘virtual’ money in accounts, they can loan out the difference. So when someone asks for a €500 loan, they approve it and put €500 in the customers account without actually having more money in reserve. They basically create that €500 out of thin air. (Which the customer eventually has to pay back with real money).

Because the total amount of money actually represents the total amount of value created (e.g. by labour and manufacturing), and they just created more money without actually creating more value, the bank just caused a little bit of inflation by issuing that loan. Meaning every time they issue a loan everyone else’s money becomes worth a little less, and this difference eventually ends up in the bank’s pockets.

[-] sunbeam60@feddit.uk 5 points 5 hours ago

They only cause inflation by lending if nothing of value is created by the money they lend out, though.

Lending just shifts the value creation to after the money is created. If we didn’t expand the money supply, we would have severe deflation and value would be created by work.

[-] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 16 points 9 hours ago
[-] tetris11@feddit.uk 8 points 9 hours ago

Water companies, when there's only one in the area. I've played this boardgame before...

[-] aceshigh@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

Monopolies in general.

[-] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 16 points 11 hours ago

For some people? Pre-ordering digital games. I mean huh? What are ye even doin there Jimmy-Bob? You afraid they're gonna run out of copies? O.o

[-] Soapbox@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 hour ago

One valid reason is for preloading. On Steam at least, when you preorder a game it will often let you download and install it the night before release so its ready to play as soon as you are.

[-] FosterMolasses@leminal.space 0 points 51 minutes ago

Lmaoooooo, I didn't even realize people did this

[-] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 5 points 3 hours ago

Pre-orders are so they know how much champagne to buy for release day.

[-] captcha_incorrect@lemmy.world 5 points 7 hours ago

That used to make sense before all games were delivered over the internet. When all games were delivered physically via disk, running out was possible. Preorder made sure you had your copy on the day of the release.

[-] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Lol yeah, that's what I meant, digitally delivered videogames. I remember having to secure my copy of like, Halo 3 or Skyrim in advance so I could play it on release. :D

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 27 Apr 2026
214 points (98.2% liked)

Asklemmy

54139 readers
1121 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS