656
submitted 2 weeks ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/news@lemmy.world

Case was seen as major test of the first amendment and whether the US could use broad anti-terrorism statute to prosecute leftwing protesters

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] CurlyWurlies4All@slrpnk.net 309 points 2 weeks ago

When being against fascism gets you charged as a terrorist, you live in a fascist regime.

[-] Typhoon@lemmy.ca 153 points 2 weeks ago

And all those concentration camps they're building aren't just for immigrants.

[-] angrystego@lemmy.world 39 points 2 weeks ago

Even if they were, it would count.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] choui4@lemmy.zip 190 points 2 weeks ago

Thats actually insane. This is a HUGE HUGE HUGE deal

[-] tomiant@piefed.social 77 points 2 weeks ago

Every other day it's something that's a HUGE HUGE HUGE fucking deal. It's done, the frog is boiled. Violent rebellion or accept fascism, choose one.

[-] choui4@lemmy.zip 14 points 2 weeks ago

Have you joined your local lefty self defense org?

[-] PhoenixDog@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago

I'm just sitting here in Canada hoping you guys get your fucking shit together and figuring out a way I can get my transgender girlfriend the fuck out of America.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] treadful@lemmy.zip 128 points 2 weeks ago

They pointed to the fact that the demonstrators took steps to prevent their cell phones from being tracked.

Prosecutors also pointed to the way that the protesters used Signal, a widely-used messaging application, as evidence of their coordination and conspiracy. The protesters used pseudonyms on the app and had messages autodelete, an increasingly common practice among protesters and journalists who are concerned about government surveillance. They also emphasized the defendants were wearing all black during the protest, sometimes describing it as “tactical” gear.

That just describes my normal non-protest day. The fuck is this?

[-] AltoCuddle@lemmy.world 40 points 2 weeks ago

My black T-shirt is now tactical gear.

[-] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 23 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Tactileneck

[-] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 24 points 2 weeks ago

When you find out you've been a terrorist your whole life...

[-] null@lemmy.org 18 points 2 weeks ago

At first they came for the tactical protestors and I said nothing. Then they came for the goths, then the emo kids.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social 14 points 2 weeks ago

Antifa! ANTIFA!!!

Me too, by the way. Tbh, I'm way closer to antifa than to ever setting foot in the USA. And I still think that's a good thing. At least being anti fascist and willing to punch a Nazi.

[-] sudoer777@lemmy.ml 12 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

The Epstein class wants to "protect the children" through mandatory ID and E2EE bans, if you don't support the Epstein class then you're a terrorist

[-] choui4@lemmy.zip 122 points 2 weeks ago

Sanchez-Estrada was the only defendant not at the protest, and was only charged with corruptly concealing a document or record, after prosecutors say he moved leftwing zines following the arrest of his wife, Maricela Rueda, on the Fourth of July. Song also escaped after the incident and there was an 11-day manhunt for him.

WTF THEYRE COMING FOR OUR ZINES!!!???

[-] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 69 points 2 weeks ago

I'm confused. Is a left wing magazine one that promotes the ideals of freedom like fighting against government overreach against your people? Is a left wing magazine one that advocates for defending your friends and family against masked thugs using any means necessary?

Because apparently I know a lot of Republicans on the Antifa payroll.

[-] Wakmrow@lemmy.world 57 points 2 weeks ago

Ooooo wow you sure got them in a pickle of hypocrisy now

Buy a gun

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 51 points 2 weeks ago

First amendment is long dead bro

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] tomiant@piefed.social 23 points 2 weeks ago

"You have been fount guilty of zpreading communist propaghanda. Ze fuhrer is most displeazed."

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] the_riviera_kid@lemmy.world 119 points 2 weeks ago

I belive the term here is "kangaroo court"

[-] NutWrench@lemmy.ml 69 points 2 weeks ago
[-] ViceroTempus@lemmy.world 67 points 2 weeks ago

If they are going to process you as terrorist anyway, then you might as well make moves that are worthy of the label. After all the only real difference between a freedom fighter and terrorist is the narrative.

load more comments (14 replies)
[-] Soulphite@reddthat.com 67 points 2 weeks ago
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 65 points 2 weeks ago

Any candidate for the 2028 Democratic presidential primary better be getting asked about pardoning all these people

[-] n4ch1sm0@piefed.social 29 points 2 weeks ago

They better be asked about how they're going to prosecute all these fucking criminals in the White House

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 51 points 2 weeks ago

Guilty till they can prove themselves innocent...FROM JAIL

What has this country come to???

[-] defaultusername@lemmy.dbzer0.com 32 points 2 weeks ago

It's been like this for a very long time. Back in the 1950s, you could call someone a communist and they would be arrested and put on trial.

[-] evenglow@lemmy.world 21 points 2 weeks ago

Republican Wonderland.

[-] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 47 points 2 weeks ago

A police officer arrived on the scene shortly after and drew his weapon at one of the people allegedly doing vandalism. One of the protesters was standing in the woods with an AR-15 and hit him in the shoulder. The officer would survive.

Even this conviction is bullshit. The cop drew first. Song shot in defense of others.

[-] NoTagBacks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 2 weeks ago

The standards of ROE they hold fucking police officers to is absolutely fucked. They draw their weapons at the drop of a hat and fucking POINT a weapon at unarmed people all the fucking time. The second weapon safety rule is to NEVER point your weapon at anything you do not intend to shoot. IN A FUCKING WAR ZONE, a mfer could be cursing at you with a goddamn AK pointed at you and ROE say you still aren't justified to engage. If a cop points a weapon directly at someone, that establishes intent by basic-ass weapons safety rules that these jackasses are supposed to be trained in. Charge all cops with attempted murder that point weapons at unarmed people. And I mean that unironically, pass a law and everything. They can't keep getting away with escalating all these situations so fucking often that people feel the need to arm themselves and put on body armor just in case they run across a cop. And if these baby-bitch cops can't be trusted with firearms, how about we take their fucking guns and arm minorities instead. At least minorities in America actually have a reason to fear for their lives enough to arm themselves.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] in_my_honest_opinion@piefed.social 47 points 2 weeks ago

Well we'll see how soon appeals can start. This is going to be a big case either way.

[-] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 46 points 2 weeks ago

another rule of fascism, always accuse your opposition as terrorist, so that your Peblian support remains strong.

[-] BigTurkeyLove@lemmy.dbzer0.com 46 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

How is any jury finding them guilty, deck has to be stacked because the ratio of ice supporters to nonsupporters even in Texas isn't enough to get an average jury to vote guilty. This is coming from a guy in Oklahoma. All they need is 1 juror to hold the line.

[-] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 46 points 2 weeks ago

All the charges against all of these folks seem to stem from this one act by one person:

One of the protesters was standing in the woods with an AR-15 and hit [a police officer] in the shoulder. The officer would survive.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] LordCrom@lemmy.world 42 points 2 weeks ago

This is a big big fucking deal and big hit to freedom here.

I can hardly believe this outcome.

[-] Maeve@kbin.earth 37 points 2 weeks ago

Mark Pittman, a US district judge nominated to the federal bench by Donald Trump in 2019, appeared to gesture at the irrelevance of antifa in the closing moments of the trial, asking prosecutors why he should mention it in his instructions to the jury, underlining the gap between the emphasis on antifa and the technicality of the criminal charges they faced. “Whether it’s antifa or the Methodist Women’s Auxiliary of Weatherford, why does it matter?” Pittman said.

[-] HumanOnEarth@lemmy.ca 34 points 2 weeks ago

Fuck the United States, piece of shit country masquerading as a free and advanced nation.

Shit. Hole. If I was there and I had any, any chance to leave I would be gone. Long, long, long gone.

T-minus 8 months until people actually start to become concerned there I guess.

[-] daychilde@lemmy.world 19 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

T-minus 8 months until people actually start to become concerned there I guess.

I guess you haven't paid attention to those of us who have been fighting against this shit as we're able for well over two decades. I guess you don't see the gradual increase in awareness.

Has it led to ovethrowing everything yet? No, but a lot of people are fucking concerned. So you guess wrong.

It is, however, a shithole, yes. And if I could get out, I fucking would.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] thethunderwolf@lemmy.dbzer0.com 30 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

There shouldn't be a law against terrorism. Real terrorism already involves serious crimes (murder etc.). There should not be a law defining "being a terrorist" as illegal.

"found guilty of support for terrorism" is bullshit.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 28 points 2 weeks ago

Meanwhile pro-ICE protester/influencer Jake Lang got caught trying to pick up what he thought was a 15 year old girl.

[-] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 27 points 2 weeks ago

The prosecutor said, "They're here because they ambushed a cop." WTF?!?! Well then, on Jan 6th a mob of fucking MAGA terrorists ambushed a lot of police officers.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] BillCheddar@lemmy.world 22 points 2 weeks ago

The first Texan to roll Paxton into the Gulf of Mexico wins.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Formfiller@lemmy.world 21 points 2 weeks ago

State sponsored domestic terrorism

[-] TwilitSky@lemmy.world 18 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Whatever side you're on, this is worrisome. Today it's Antifa, tomorrow it's the Tea Party etc.

Weapons can be repurposed as new parties take power endlessly until finally some sane group of souls has the decency to legislate away malicious prosecutions based on politics.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 16 points 2 weeks ago

Only seems that way because the real terrorists are running the system

[-] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 16 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Song faces a minimum of 20 years and a maximum of life in prison, according to the US attorney for the northern district of Texas. Arnold, Evetts, Morris, Rueda, Batten, Elizabeth Soto and Ines Soto each face between 10 and 60 years in prison. Sanchez Estrada faces up to 40 years.

Just out of curiosity, has the DOJ ever gotten around to charging anybody in the Epstein files other than Maxwell? Bc there's like millions of files.

Like even just one single pedophile? Just to make the streets a little safer? Surely if they can make all this complete bullshit stick they can make something from those files stick, right?

I'm sure they're more than motivated and will be getting around to it soon. It's only been 14 months and they probably just got a little distracted.

They had to take care of the much more dangerous members of a made up organization. Now that that's all cleared up and out of the way, I'm sure the hammer of justice will be swift for all those names that show up over and over again in those files....

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 weeks ago

Voting Republican supports terrorism and that’s okay so can we drop the dramatics and call the charges out for what they really are? They inconvenienced rich people.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2026
656 points (99.4% liked)

News

36811 readers
2153 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS