429
is this even possible (thelemmy.club)
top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] bearboiblake@pawb.social 3 points 19 minutes ago

Protest and elect. Emphasis on protest.

  1. Get as involved as you can with activist efforts locally.
  2. Organize, network, focus on building solidarity.
  3. Vote at primaries for the most progressive candidate.
  4. Don't punch down
  5. Don't punch left.
[-] some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world 1 points 16 minutes ago

All important, but those last two are key to enabling the rest imo

[-] SteveCC@lemmy.world 34 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Ranked Choice Voting.
Where we don't just have to hold our noses and pick from 2. https://represent.us/

A video about it- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TfQij4aQq1k

[-] chaogomu@lemmy.world 2 points 27 minutes ago

Ranked Choice has a Monotonicity problem. i.e. it's possible for a candidate to lose if a more people rank that candidate higher on their own ballot without changing any other ballots.

This has happened in recent RCV elections, and resulted in the candidate's ideological opposition winning.

There's a group called FairVote that's been pushing RCV since the early 90s despite the many flaws of the system. Flaws that have been known since the system was first designed in 1788.

Seriously, Instant Runoff Voting was invented by the Marquis de Condorcet in 1788 as an example of a broken election system that can eliminate candidates preferred by a majority of voters.

It was later reinvented in the late 1850s by an Englishman who presumably never learned French.

Anyway a modern voting system for consideration is STAR, it was developed in 2014 by people who have read Condorcet, the the works of Kenneth Arrow from the 1950s. (Arrow's Impossibility Theorium)

Find more info at www.equal.vote

[-] OhNoMoreLemmy@lemmy.ml 8 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

You know what's even better? Proportional representation and an executive branch that answers directly to your elected parliament.

Ranked choice or STV just means you continue to vote against Republicans and hope for the second worst option of Democrats, but you can feel better about yourself because you put a left-wing party down as your first choice.

STV should only be used for figurehead positions with no real power.

[-] bacon_pdp@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

STAR voting is slightly better in a couple of situations but yeah, that would be real progress

[-] 5too@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

I would love to be in a position to pick the worse if these two!

[-] xxce2AAb@feddit.dk 7 points 2 hours ago

I don't know, but I absolutely support any attempt to find out.

[-] Hond@piefed.social 45 points 4 hours ago

Now imagine more than two choices!

[-] SargonOfACAB@slrpnk.net 10 points 2 hours ago

Living in Europe this is fairly easy te remember. None of the choices are great, but they definitely exist.

[-] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Yeah, it’s a choice among:

all out evil

Definitely evil, but still pretending to be good. (Weirdly,they’re the only capable party, and though at least half of the stuff they champion is awful, the amount of things they get done that aren’t evil is somehow still larger than whatever good any less evil party can get done. It’s still not worth it, to be clear, it’s just a shitty quirk of this political climate.)

Doesn’t yet realize they’re evil, but they are

Half good hearted but misguided, half foreign agents trying to sow discord

Great except for one issue, will never get a high portion of the vote

Great all around, will really never get a high portion of the vote

Guess the country and guess the parties for a sense of being quick on the uptake and in on the joke.

hint for the last twoI’m in favor of giving Ukraine weapons and pro European unity

[-] Enkrod@feddit.org 1 points 14 minutes ago

My guessGermany

  • AfD
  • CDU
  • SPD
  • BSW
  • The Left
  • Greens
[-] TehWorld@lemmy.world 12 points 3 hours ago

Texas just had to choose between Talarico and Crockett. Both sounded like great candidates to me and hope that Crockett can continue her path in politics (albeit without the AIPAC issue she has)

[-] GreenShimada@lemmy.world 7 points 3 hours ago

To be fair, that is how primaries work. In many states only people registered with the party can pick who ends up at the binary vote. Which forces people to denigrate themselves by capitulating to a party in order to be allowed to run in their primary and get money.

[-] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 1 points 53 minutes ago

In California the open primary allows everyone to vote for anyone. Last time that left us with 2 Democrats running for the final, but this year there are so many people splintering the Democratic voters, we could wind up with 2 Republicans.

[-] tastetheplague@sh.itjust.works 16 points 4 hours ago

I'd be willing to take the worse of two goods at this point.

[-] s@piefed.world 10 points 4 hours ago

Harm reduction. If forced into a binary choice, I’d rather lose a finger than lose a hand.

[-] PyroNeurosis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 hour ago

At some point, you will run out of fingers...

[-] s@piefed.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Some of y’all are taking this analogy too far and missing the point

Sure, but at some point ya gotta think, "Maybe I should destroy the de-limbing machine," instead of continuing to put part of your body in there.

(This isn't a criticism of you or your beliefs, just a jokey perspective.)

[-] nialv7@lemmy.world 16 points 4 hours ago

i guess we need rage, rage against the delimbing machine?

[-] TachyonTele@piefed.social 2 points 3 hours ago

Dont go slowly into the night. Rage. Rage against the machine

[-] s@piefed.world 5 points 4 hours ago

I mean yeah obviously

this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2026
429 points (99.1% liked)

Microblog Memes

11028 readers
1605 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS