next time I hear "there is just too many (brown) people" i swear

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 148 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (45 children)

Yeah, kinda like that time Brian Thompson got shot, and the next day United Healthcare ceased to exist.

Not saying that the general point of corporations doing more harm than people is wrong. Just that if you think that the corporation is just one person, I've got a bridge to sell you.

  • source
  • hideshow 45 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 6 months ago (6 children)

    The way in which Luigi was arrested is part of their safety checks. A way to motivate working class to turn people in, without paying them. I generally thought reward money worked.

    I learned it did not work from a podcast that no longer exists. Michael Bazzel’s OSINT podcast talked about it within the context of people who used OSINT to find people on wanted lists and how reward money collection actually works. (Podcast doesn’t exist any more, the copies of the casts went away with the podcast.). Sadly, there’s no replacement for this type of news and info condensed down into one place. It’s also a niche area of information, not followed by many.

    Those McDonald's workers were not paid for turning Luigi in. But they thought they would be.

    Even so, look at the bigger picture. How many Luigi’s have there been since 1981?

    Most people avoid confrontation, spending most of their days sitting in a chair or lying down, and thinking/hoping/wishing a white knight is going to rescue them from their situation. It’s one reason why so many people exist in bad relationships (1 or a chain of them). Because they think that other person is going to rescue them from their sad days of avoiding confrontation while sitting in a chair or lying down, most of the day for most of their days. Hoping. But never doing. Thinking about doing. Maybe spouting off on the internet about doing. But never doing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    find people on wanted lists and how reward money collection actually works

    How does it actually work?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 6 months ago

    Generally? It doesn't.

    See making the call to tip off the cops makes you eligible for the reward. If you called the correct tip/reward phone number. So that's the first road block.

    Even then, you aren't automatically getting the reward. No. There are still hoops to jump through.

    As a note these additional hoops also apply when there isn't a specific phone number.

    According to the FBI's website, I'd link but I'm on my phone, someone (an agent, a prosecutor, etc) has to put your name forward in a nomination package.

    This is then reviewed by the FBI and other agencies, it's kind of vague.

    Anyway these agencies decide if you get a reward and what percentage.

    And none of this can start until after a conviction is secured.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • [–] 11 points 6 months ago

    Yeah, kinda like that time Brian Thompson got shot, and the next day United Healthcare ceased to exist.

    Their HP definitely went down. And, anecdotally, I heard from a pharmacist friend that they were approving claims like nobody's business for the next day or so

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (22 replies)
    [–] 43 points 6 months ago* (4 children)

    So you're saying me taking out some replaceable oil execs is going to make people have less demand for oil and everything that comes from it?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    But there isn't a "demand" at least not as much as years ago. We are trying to switch to renewables but the oil execs keep killing the renewable progress. The horse fucker in the white house won't let us move on. He kills wind and solar and forces the coal plants to stay open.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 6 months ago*

    And that horse fucker won more votes than Kamala.

    There's a whole party where resistance to green tech is one of the items of faith, hundreds of millions of people. Not just a handful of oil execs. (And yknow, the millions who still use gasoline in their cars etc.)

    Edit: That's not to mention all those who like to fly places.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 34 points 6 months ago (10 children)

    I honestly have to wonder at what point people will collectively say "why the hell are we letting them do this" ? Not sure what happens after that, but it seems like it must have to happen at some point, right? Right?

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • load more comments (9 replies)
    [–] 33 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (8 children)

    I said nothing of the sort. But I ask once again: If we execute these 90 people, will that make us stop burning oil? Is it at least a helpful step down the path of stopping to burn oil?

    If not, then please just don't act as though these 90 people are all we have to overcome to save the planet.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 23 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Had a few seconds where I thought "Wired" was referring to the tech magazine and wondered what "Tired" is, who would choose name for their magazine or whatever?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 21 points 6 months ago* (40 children)

    Still wrong, it's capitalism. Without them, there would be different people in the same position. Hate the game, not the player. Well, hate the game and the player but don't expect change from exchanging the player

  • source
  • hideshow 40 child comments
  • load more comments (39 replies)
    [–] 20 points 6 months ago (12 children)

    Kind of. It's the system they operate under, capitalism.

    Get rid of those specific people and you would have others people take their place.

    However, not to say that it isn't worthwhile to also bust out the guillotines

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • load more comments (12 replies)
    [–] 17 points 6 months ago

    It’s a reminder that large problems are often tied to concentrated power. Holding systems accountable while still pushing for collective change is probably the most constructive path forward.

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 6 months ago (4 children)

    https://www.forbes.com/real-time-billionaires/

    Sometimes I like to gaze lovingly into their faces while writing their names in my diary.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    Something to remember about the Forbes List: the most terrible people of all, aren't even on it. There is a level of wealth that floats above mere billionaires, for which there almost isn't even a category. Forbes knows not to mention these families in the context of some tawdry popularity contest among nouveau riche Techno Trash. They are mostly centuries old multi-generational wealth like monarchies, the Rothschilds, sheikhs, organized crime families, dictators, etc.

    They aren't on the list, but they hold the real wealth, and more importantly, the real power. Everything else is an illusion of their making.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 17 points 6 months ago

    If only there was like a deck of cards with their faces on it.

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

    Imagine if we just locked all the doors and firebombed Davos. Could save humanity in one day of work.

    edit: for legal reasons I wish to clarify this is a joke

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 15 points 6 months ago* (4 children)

    They'll find new executives, bud. Executives are just the lackeys for shareholders and the board of directors. A new one will grow for each one lost.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 11 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    someone needs to mangione them

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 10 points 6 months ago (4 children)

    While killing them would be progress, the real need is a revolution.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    100% this, and not an explicitly violent revolution, either. We need to build alternative power structures to replace our heirarchical society. Simply replacing our elites using violence would end up with a new set of elites who are very provably willing to use violence against their enemies. IMO this is one of the major reasons that marxism-leninism has historically yielded authoritarian states, e.g. the USSR.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • [–] 9 points 6 months ago* (7 children)

    Fewer than a single box of ammo.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (7 replies)
    [–] 9 points 6 months ago (1 child)
    load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 7 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    Yes I'm sure the corporations beneath these people will simply evaporate and everything will go perfectly fine.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 7 points 6 months ago
    load more comments
    view more: next ›