Destruction of world's largest humanitarian programme was done without formal authority or official oversight, former USAID employees claim

Elon Musk, leader of the Trump administration's now-disbanded Department of Government Efficiency, must sit for depositions along with senior State Department officials over their role in dismantling the U.S. Agency for International Development, a federal judge ruled Tuesday.

Pointing to findings that Musk had made the decision to break up USAID – one of the world's largest humanitarian programs – despite lacking formal authority or official approval – District Judge Theodore Chuang wrote that there was "no alternative" than for Musk and other officials to provide testimony regarding their decision-making process.

The ruling represents a win for a group of anonymous former USAID employees who are suing Musk, DOGE and State Department officials over the closure.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 165 points 6 months ago (3 children)

If he ever faces justice for the hundreds of thousands needlessly dead because of him I hope it a fine based on net worth like the Nordic countries do, and then death.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] 75 points 6 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 10 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Yeah but that value is based almost exclusively on stock in volatile companies like Tesla. Kill Tesla and that disappears basically overnight.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    Yes but that concentration of wealth is not only an asset but a threat.

    He’s rich. Obscenely rich. The kind of rich where you can buy other rich people. He has no peers.

    And if you take him out, that money, power, influence, it’s all up for grabs. The power vacuum is intoxicating to a certain subset of humanity who, funny thing, he’s been propping up.

    I’m concerned about the leopards. They are going to die of morbid obesity.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 61 points 6 months ago (4 children)

    This is so annoying. If he wasn't allowed to or able to or supposed to, how did it happen???

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 6 months ago* (14 children)

    USAID was established in 1961 by President John F. Kennedy via executive order under the authority of the Congress-passed Foreign Assistance Act of 1961. While authorized by this legislation, it was later formally codified as an independent agency by Congress through the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998.

    Sadly, a LOT of people stayed home and did not vote for Kamala Harris, or they voted 3rd party, and Trump was elected to run the Executive branch. The Trump administration decided the executive branch could choose which laws they executed. The opposition was immediate and lawsuits were filed, but the gears of justice grind slowly, so here we are in 2026 with depositions finally starting.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • load more comments (14 replies)
  • [–] 54 points 6 months ago (4 children)

    We need less "depose" and more "dispose".

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 54 points 6 months ago

    I thought that said deported.

    My evening is ruined.

  • source
  • [–] 42 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Spoiler Alert: It was a grift at the expense of the American tax payer. Like literally everything the Republican party does.

    Elect criminals, get robbed.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 34 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    Ten's of thousands of people have already died at the hands of Elon Musk destroying USAID. It was all part of their plan. Then Elon got hundreds of billions in welfare from trump for helping do the dirty work.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 34 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    Maybe trial him for mass murder as this costed an estimate of 600.000 to 1.200.000 people their lives.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 6 months ago* (1 child)

    I could be wrong here, but are you sure that's not a projected outcome due to the fallout vs present has happened. I don't doubt it will, just not sure it has.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 6 months ago* (10 children)

    Freeze his assets. He needs to fund the rebuilding of our national security infrastructure

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • load more comments (8 replies)
    [–] 28 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Don't you get deported when you're not born in the US and are convicted of a felony? Just saying.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Oh no. A deposition. Questions will be asked. He's in big trouble.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 21 points 6 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)
  • [–] 26 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

    At worst? Ever so slightly stoke voter outrage at this whole fiasco and increase awareness of the oligarch class.

    At best? Fines, jail time, reinstatement of disbanded agencies.

    Nothing in the at best camp is likely to happen, but making a spectacle out of it and potentially getting someone to admit something they don't mean to will likely help nudge some voters. Even if they're mostly left leaning getting more people to turn out will help.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 6 months ago

    It should be remembered that when AOC made her first appearance with Congress, it was to question Michael Cohen during his testimony, before going to prison. She rapidfired questions at him, and he rapidfired answers right back, and that testimony formed the foundation of Leticia James' successful prosecution of Trump and verdict of guilty on 34 felonies. So real consequences can come from these Congressional dog & pony shows.

    Furthermore, they will be under oath, so if they say anything that contradicts anything else, it's perjury. And this testimony will be the official record, so if they ever make a statement that contradicts it, it's perjury again.

    Also, they're going to try to avoid testifying, so we may get the opportunity to imprison them when they refuse to honor the subpoenas.

    And when they do testify, we get to use their lies against them in campaigns, etc., and they get to put their virtuosic stupidity, ignorance, and evil on display for the entire world.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 19 points 6 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 19 points 6 months ago

    Christ, can they seize all of his assets?

    Also, will this be recorded and shown to the public?

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    DEPORT THIS AFRICAN IMMIGRANT!

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 10 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    For just a moment I thought it said 'deported'. For just that moment, I felt elation like I haven't known in years.

    I'm still hopeful.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›