Destruction of world's largest humanitarian programme was done without formal authority or official oversight, former USAID employees claim

Elon Musk, leader of the Trump administration's now-disbanded Department of Government Efficiency, must sit for depositions along with senior State Department officials over their role in dismantling the U.S. Agency for International Development, a federal judge ruled Tuesday.

Pointing to findings that Musk had made the decision to break up USAID – one of the world's largest humanitarian programs – despite lacking formal authority or official approval – District Judge Theodore Chuang wrote that there was "no alternative" than for Musk and other officials to provide testimony regarding their decision-making process.

The ruling represents a win for a group of anonymous former USAID employees who are suing Musk, DOGE and State Department officials over the closure.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 165 points 6 months ago (3 children)

If he ever faces justice for the hundreds of thousands needlessly dead because of him I hope it a fine based on net worth like the Nordic countries do, and then death.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] 75 points 6 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 30 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

    Unfortunately it’s the US justice system

    But it's the best justice system money can buy?!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 6 months ago* (1 child)

    It's the best justice system money can buy out*

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    That was sort of implied, yes

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago

    I've been saying for decades now that america has the best education/healthcare/justice that money can buy. I don't say that about government because it hasn't been the best for decades even if it has been bought for decades.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Yeah but that value is based almost exclusively on stock in volatile companies like Tesla. Kill Tesla and that disappears basically overnight.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 6 points 6 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    that is until he recieves order from putin/aipac to sabotage starlinks during critical moments, like elections and plan of attack for ukraine.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -2 points 6 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 9 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Yes but that concentration of wealth is not only an asset but a threat.

    He’s rich. Obscenely rich. The kind of rich where you can buy other rich people. He has no peers.

    And if you take him out, that money, power, influence, it’s all up for grabs. The power vacuum is intoxicating to a certain subset of humanity who, funny thing, he’s been propping up.

    I’m concerned about the leopards. They are going to die of morbid obesity.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 0 points 6 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    That would be a dream come true. AI agents are not legal entities with the right to own or inherit property. Therefore, all of his stuff has no legal owner. By the principle of escheat, it now belongs to the State.

    Sadly, I doubt Elon's lawyers are quite this dumb.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago

    AI agents are not legal entities with the right to own or inherit property.

    Maybe not yet. But we've decided that corporations are people already. Maybe he's incorporated his AI girlfriend somewhere....

  • source
  • parent