145
submitted 4 weeks ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] green_red_black@slrpnk.net 21 points 4 weeks ago

Next thing you know Live Nation conveniently announces that they can no longer operate in California

[-] robocall@lemmy.world 14 points 4 weeks ago
[-] Formfiller@lemmy.world 3 points 4 weeks ago

Gavin Vetoes everything that goes against shareholder profits

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 18 points 4 weeks ago

California lawmakers introduce a bill

[-] Formfiller@lemmy.world 8 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

Came here to say this. This clown literally vetoes anything that goes against shareholder profits. I guess he’s too busy denying genocide and platforming fascists to GAF about the working class

[-] QuadratureSurfer@piefed.social 7 points 4 weeks ago

The bill – labeled AB 1720 – would make it illegal to resell a concert, theater, comedy or other live entertainment ticket (sports are not included) at a price higher than face value (the cost of the ticket plus fees from the primary ticketing source) plus 10% for shows taking place in California.

I've had to sell a ticket through ticketmaster because we weren't going to be able to make it to the show. The problem is that I had to sell the ticket at a higher price just to break even with the fees that they add on.

At least with this bill we would still be allowed to sell it without taking a loss, but I wonder how it handles the case for when a ticket has been resold multiple times.

Still I think we really need a law like this if we want to tackle the scalping issue we have.

[-] green_red_black@slrpnk.net 7 points 4 weeks ago

Honestly I often wonder why Ticket master can’t just refund folks that genuinely can’t make it

[-] tetrachromacy@lemmy.world 8 points 4 weeks ago

Ferengi rule of acquisition #1: "Once you have their money, you never give it back."

[-] CallMeAnAI@lemmy.world 5 points 4 weeks ago

They're assholes.

[-] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 weeks ago

Because they also own the reselling platform and make a cut off that too.

[-] green_red_black@slrpnk.net 1 points 4 weeks ago

And also the venues and Act bookings

[-] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago

I wonder how it handles the case for when a ticket has been resold multiple times.

The face value wouldn’t change, would it?

[-] bitwolf@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 weeks ago

Cool, so it'll be cheaper for me to fly to California and watch a show than it will be locally with the prices of some of these shows.

[-] the_riviera_kid@lemmy.world 3 points 4 weeks ago

Just criminalize scalping.

[-] cattywampas@lemmy.world 4 points 4 weeks ago

Literally what this bill would do.

[-] the_riviera_kid@lemmy.world 5 points 4 weeks ago
  1. sports not included

  2. can still sell for 10% more than the price

  3. no mention of goods beyond ticket sales

no it doesn't it just caps the potential price on a small amount of frequently scalped goods (concert tickets).

this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2026
145 points (99.3% liked)

News

36354 readers
3492 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS