638
submitted 1 week ago by EngineX@lemmy.zip to c/reddit@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] schwim@piefed.zip 191 points 1 week ago

Soooooo, reading someone's password then using it is "hacking" now?

Yours,
Schwim, Master Hacker

[-] hesh@quokk.au 108 points 1 week ago

Yeah, much of "hacking" is lamer than the movies show.

[-] Canconda@lemmy.ca 49 points 1 week ago

Rami Malek did a decent job of making "real hacking" look cool in Mr Robot

[-] LodeMike@lemmy.today 38 points 1 week ago

That was mostly the production crew who took a lot of time to use real hacks and UIs to recreate them live.

[-] Canconda@lemmy.ca 27 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I was moreso getting at the social engineering bits. But yea the writing and production was well done for sure!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] RustyShackleford@piefed.social 40 points 1 week ago

If you can read, you’re now a hacker. Which means a good percentage of Trump voters can’t hack.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] NotSteve_@piefed.ca 13 points 1 week ago

Somewhat, yeah. A lot of hacking is like that along with social engineering

[-] sirico@feddit.uk 10 points 1 week ago

Basically 80% of the "hacks" in the world find ez password get on lan create admin

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] fizzle@quokk.au 123 points 1 week ago

Maybe I'm misunderstanding something because no one here has mentioned the obvious:

Did we acquire the full unredacted set of his emails ?

[-] ubersolver@lemmy.world 88 points 1 week ago

Seriously, wouldn't this be kind of huge news if we suddenly had access to the evidence they tried to hide? Too bad this is a news article and someone probably changed the password by now.

[-] tetrachromacy@lemmy.world 51 points 1 week ago

There's no news on it and I have to assume it's because if that is the full unredacted email there's probably a ton of CSAM. If so it's technically illegal to own and anyone who is downloading it might be opening themselves up to arrest or legal challenges, even if they're a journalist.

I would presume IF this is a full release of the Epstein GMail account, and IF it's not a honeypot op of some kind from CIA/IDF/SVR/whoever, and IF it's legit... then this is big. Nearly all American news orgs have been gutted though, and I doubt any billionaire that owns the news orgs would be ok with having their wealthy cohort exposed.

Whoever might be investigating this would almost certainly keep quiet until all of their ducks are in a row because the second they publish, they're going to be arrested for CSAM. Unless they're in a country with no extradition treaty with the US. And even then they'll be subject to extraordinary rendition cause Trump don't care about US law, why would the lack of an extradition treaty stop him?

[-] ubersolver@lemmy.world 38 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It's ridiculous that evidence of the crimes they committed is going to be used to arrest anyone who tries to uncover evidence of who committed those crimes. By ridiculous I don't mean I don't think it will happen. I think you are right about that.

I mean, I know there are some people who would definitely do the wrong thing and that's why it needed to be released carefully to avoid this kind of mess and why normally this kind of digging would be done by the government or trusted investigators, but it's troublesome because the established power structure (regardless of party) are some of the same people who committed these crimes and we clearly can't trust them to do the right thing.

[-] REDACTED@infosec.pub 22 points 1 week ago

From what I remember, the guy said that not much was left and most of the emails were deleted

[-] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 84 points 1 week ago

Nobody hacked anything

People found account credentials and tried using them. Nothing nhogh tech here

[-] Donkter@lemmy.world 45 points 1 week ago

Many hackers agree that the best way to hack someone is through social engineering to just have them tell you your password.

[-] VitoRobles@lemmy.today 17 points 1 week ago

My favorite is when this security researcher showed on camera how she did it. She took out her laptop and pulled up a soundboard. She pretended to be mom with a crying baby, and begged the customer support to change her account email and reset her password. When they did try to ask for some verification, she played the baby crying sound effects louder. Feeling bad for her, they did what she asked and she "hacked" into the account.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] thermal_shock@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago

Its technically hacking due to it not being your account. Unauthorized access.

load more comments (42 replies)
[-] boogiebored@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Hacking is very wide and can include things like this. It does not have to be as technical, hard or clever as most gatekeep it to be.

Source: 20 years of experience in the space

ex. password stuffing brute force is hacking

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] fallaciousBasis@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

Unauthorized access to a computer system is hacking. It's trespassing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 68 points 1 week ago
[-] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 51 points 1 week ago
[-] kmartburrito@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago

yep, no matter how many times you type hunter2, it will show to us as *******

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 68 points 1 week ago

So every other child rapist's name gets redacted but they can't even do a scan for passwords?

[-] P1k1e@lemmy.world 45 points 1 week ago

They were so busy hunting for the rapists they completely forgot about passwords......or we've got some decent folks weaponizing "incompetence"

[-] CainTheLongshot@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I'm convinced they used AI to redact everything, and didn't double back and check them until after a particular page made headlines.

I've seen numerous videos where they program a script to remove the 5-6 different ways "redactions" were added and they make no sense from a technical stand point, leaving me to believe that someone non-technical told AI exactly how they wanted to redact, and then put those files in their outbox.

[-] NotSteve_@piefed.ca 14 points 1 week ago

They uploaded the Bash 3.3 reference manual and even that had some redactions so your theory is almost definitely correct

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] criss_cross@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago

Apparently the word “don’t” can also be found redacted.

Because they did a regex for Don(.)T and didn’t bother to check

[-] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 11 points 1 week ago

They did bother to check, they are just sloppy. It seems like it's more that one slipped through the cracks. There are plenty of unredacted "don t" in the files. Looks like they did blanket redactions of "Don T" (and other Trump related names) and then went through manually and unredacted false positives to cover their tracks. But they missed one. It's still a smoking gun, though, as there's literally no reason to redact "don t".

[-] FaceDeer@fedia.io 28 points 1 week ago
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] qevlarr@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago
[-] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz 22 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] RedRibbonArmy@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 week ago

Let's see some names. Time to burn these sadist pedo billionaires.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

We already have a ton of names. Nobody is getting burned.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Kirk@startrek.website 16 points 1 week ago

Surprised a Lemmy instance doesn't have it honestly

[-] WhyIHateTheInternet@lemmy.world 36 points 1 week ago

If they'd stop talking about Linux or posting furry porn for a minute they would.

/s

[-] kek@discuss.tchncs.de 23 points 1 week ago
[-] Bristlecone@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago
load more comments (1 replies)

remember the windows 7 activation key?

Did anyone scrape and archive the contents?

[-] Wilco@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 week ago

The hacker should send Trump an Epstein Island invite ... the old pedo pervert may have a stroke from it.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2026
638 points (98.6% liked)

Reddit

22475 readers
139 users here now

News and Discussions about Reddit

Welcome to !reddit. This is a community for all news and discussions about Reddit.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules


Rule 1- No brigading.

**You may not encourage brigading any communities or subreddits in any way. **

YSKs are about self-improvement on how to do things.



Rule 2- No illegal or NSFW or gore content.

**No illegal or NSFW or gore content. **



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-Reddit posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS