195

These votes demonstrate that the Democratic Party functions not as an opposition but as an enabler of the Trump administration. Its priority is to ensure the uninterrupted funding of the US military while diverting popular opposition with calls for meaningless cosmetic changes to the administration’s efforts to establish a presidential dictatorship.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] pageflight@piefed.social 59 points 16 hours ago

Twenty-one Republicans—primarily from the fascistic House Freedom Caucus—voted against the bill. The Democrats responded by supplying the exact number of votes needed to offset Republican defections.

Were the Republicans just unwilling to accept the reduced ICE budget, or actually against it?

[-] drdalek@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 12 hours ago

Irrelevant when the Democrats give them the votes regardless. America, lost in 2 terms. They said it couldn't be done

[-] yakko@feddit.uk 3 points 11 hours ago

America has been coming into its final form ever since Jerry Falwell successfully melded religion and politics. That gave you Reagan, Trump, and everything that comes after.

[-] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 9 points 15 hours ago

It doesn't matter anymore

[-] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 38 points 17 hours ago

I really don't understand how this can be viewed as anything other than a win.

Necessary social programs, including taxing and auditing the rich, are getting funded through September while the entire DHS runs out in 2 weeks. That's fantastic. That's the best fucking news I've heard since before the second Trump term began.

[-] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 1 points 36 minutes ago

Sadly, Dems will cave and pass funding for DHS with extremely little or even zero changes.

Even if by some miracle they get "promises" to make changes to DHS, ICE, etc. There will not be any follow through.

[-] BenderRodriguez@lemmy.world 14 points 14 hours ago

Because people only read the headline and the same negative comments always get the most upvotes.

My theory is if 21 Republicans voted against it then there's got to be some good things in there.

[-] coreray00@discuss.online 3 points 13 hours ago

I don't understand your position. Can you help me understand your point of view?

I'm stuck in my point of view, and all I can think of is if 20 nazis figured they could build another concentration camp for children, if they didn't vote for a bill, would that make the bill that continued funding the first one good on the whole? Even if it funded some libraries?

[-] BenderRodriguez@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Ask yourself why the house freedom caucus is voting against it. It's because they wanted more funding for ice and more damage to the working class and less oversight on the rich.

The Republicans are running all three branches of the government elite class supporting Democrats are helping. We got to take wins when we get them.

[-] DaMummy@hilariouschaos.com 12 points 16 hours ago

While Trump is building concentration camps throughout the country for people to spend their whole life in! It's so thoughtful of him to not only have a jobs program to build them, but to also house people! Let's hope he also puts signs above the warehouses with something like "Work will set you free"

[-] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 10 points 16 hours ago

That's exactly what loses all funding in 2 weeks as a result of this bill.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 8 points 16 hours ago

I really don’t understand how this can be viewed as anything other than a win

Wsws.org is one of those sites it's really hard to take seriously, and their articles that do get boosted here are still the sanest takes from the website.

It's basically rage bait, it's hard to believe their writers can consistently misinterprete so much

[-] AmidFuror@fedia.io 5 points 16 hours ago

You have to ask yourself, "What would Leon Trotsky think of this?" Then you'll understand where the Worldwide Socialist Web Site is coming from.

You can peruse their Marxist library if you need more ideas.

[-] minorkeys@lemmy.world 5 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Because the priority right now isn't social programs and funding for shit Trump will just cut when the GOP gains unopposed power and eliminates democracy FFS. Getting a cookie by funding the elimination of democracy and the dissolution of rights isn't a fucking win.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] whereIsTamara@lemmy.org 4 points 16 hours ago

Lmfao DHS will not run out of money. Remember when a private donor gave $130m to the military to cover wages? Yeah, that will happen again.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 7 points 16 hours ago

DHS got 75 billion to spend over the next decade in the BBB already...

The funding bill that just passed covers most of the government till September, but DHS just till end of next week, like 10 days.

They're not gonna run out of money, but they have to burn that 75 billion down while all the good shit that wouldn't have gotten any money gets funded.

Like, if you're not happy with this, what would it have taken?

[-] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 6 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

130M is fucking nothing. The "Big Beautiful Bill" that the GOP passed previously via VP tiebreaker and house reconciliation gave the DHS 85 Billion dollars. It's going from $85,000,000,000 that they've already spent down to $0.

In theory, the GOP could do another similar bill with reconciliation, but why they haven't is unclear and any DNC resistance would be futile.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 18 points 16 hours ago
[-] minorkeys@lemmy.world 17 points 16 hours ago

Good cop and bad cop, but both cops. Build an opposing faction within the DNC that refuses to cooperate with establishment dems. Take the party over.

[-] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 4 points 14 hours ago

Yep, it's like having one manager at work who is really cool, and makes it easier to work, and another manager is a screaming tyrant who makes every moment at work horrific.

We'd all rather work for the nice boss, but make no mistake, they both have the same corporate objectives, just different ways of accomplishing it.

Both parties are just lackeys for the Sociopathic Oligarchs.

[-] bearboiblake@pawb.social 5 points 16 hours ago

This wouldn't work, the establishment has too many systems in place that would prevent this. We need to think outside of the system.

[-] minorkeys@lemmy.world 4 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

The entire election system prevents third parties. MAGA took over the gop so it can absolutely happen. They aren't all genius political actors they are fallible, have vulnerabilities and can be out maneuvered by a large enough politically active base.

[-] ClassStruggle@lemmy.ml 2 points 14 hours ago

The difference is that MAGA isnt a threat to the status quo, if anything they are reinforcing the systems to protect it

[-] bearboiblake@pawb.social 1 points 14 hours ago

The entire election system prevents third parties.

Yes, that's why I said you need to think outside the system. You cannot reform the Democrats, and you cannot reform the US electoral system. Revolution is absolutely mandatory for people to live free.

[-] Maeve@kbin.earth 5 points 16 hours ago

Cancel the dnc and rnc.

[-] EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml 2 points 15 hours ago

Reform is a surefire failure

[-] minorkeys@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Then explain MAGA taking over the GOP. If the status quo can't change, how could it change for them? This defeatism is useless and projection of your own sense of powerlessness.

[-] ClassStruggle@lemmy.ml 3 points 14 hours ago

They are reinforcing the systems that protect the status quo

[-] I_Jedi@lemmy.today 1 points 13 hours ago

Unlike the Democrats, the GOP didn't have a superdelegate system in 2016. If they had such a system, Jeb Bush would've won the primary.

[-] EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml 5 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

How the tide has turned, a year ago this post would have had 100 downvotes by now with defenders of blue fascism foaming at the mouth defending their party and their actions. Better late than never.

The worst part about being leftist is always being right too early.

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world -1 points 10 hours ago

Public disarmament by exploding "in place". Might send a message even to those hard of thinking that putting random things up in the ass is a bad idea.

[-] Throbbing_banjo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 7 hours ago

I, too, sometimes say words in random order.

Seriously though, what?

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2026
195 points (93.0% liked)

politics

27957 readers
2897 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS