236
submitted 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/politics@lemmy.world

The next phase of ICE’s big ramp-up: a nationwide network of vast detention facilities. But guess what? Even parts of Red America are saying no.

Archived copies of the article:

Additional information about the scale and location of the planned conversion of warehouses into concentration camps

top 37 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] Cyberflunk@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago

ITS CALLED A CONCENTRATION CAMP

AND ALL THE WEIGHT THAT ENTAILS

[-] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 11 points 11 hours ago

For context: The average maximum security prison is 800-1200 people, and the largest, at 8300, is in Angola, LA. That has been sufficient for the most incarcerated nation in America. But MAGA thinks we need to imprison even more.

Everybody seems to have forgotten that one of Trump's first Executive Orders was the construction of a 30,000 bed facility in Guantanamo Bay.

Expanding Migrant Operations Center at Naval Station Guantanamo Bay to Full Capacity

Trump to prepare facility at Guantanamo for 30,000 migrants

And the $250 million contract has been awarded:

Constellis Announces $249 Million Construction Contract at U.S. Naval Base in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba

Work is currently on progress, and slated to end in 2029, for the next president, I presume.

They've been deporting people as fast as they can catch them, and yet they are building facilities all over America, and now this giant one in Guantanamo Bay. If they are deporting people, who do they plan on putting there? The official answer was high profile illegal immigrant criminals, whose home countries couldn't be trusted to hold them, but there can't be that many of those people.

So who do they plan holding there, far from the prying eyes of family, lawyers, courts, and especially the media?

And what happens a few years down the line, when nearly all immigrants have been removed? What are they going to do with the richest agency in the government? What are they going to do with all those massive concentration camps? Close them down, and give back the money? Or find a new boogeyman to utilize those resources?

[-] ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 10 hours ago

The ones who Epstein can no longer traffic for them. Kids can't eat and torture themselves you know.

[-] ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 10 hours ago

Wait until they are almost done, and then burn them to the ground. After a while, no insurance company will cover them. This is the same reason that I see no issue with vandalizing Teslas, as long as the owners are not hurt.

[-] acme401@lemmy.world 30 points 17 hours ago

"I'd like to share a story from a local paper in Coldwater, Michigan dated to the 9th of April, 1945. It tells how the US Army, under General Patton--the US 3rd Army--came onto what you might call a detention center just outside the village of Ohrdruf, Germany. 

The US Army brought the leading citizens of Ohrdruf to tour the facility, which turned out to be part of the Buchenwald network of concentration camps. A US Army colonel told the German civilians who viewed the scenes, without muttering a word, that they were to blame. 

One of the Germans replied that what happened in the camp was (quote) 'done by a few people, and you cannot blame us all.' And the American, who could have been any one of our grandfathers, said, 'this was done by those that the German people chose to lead them, and all are responsible.' 

The morning after the tour, the Mayor of Ohrdruf killed himself. And maybe he did not know the full extent of the outrages that were committed in his community, but he knew enough. And we don't know exactly how ICE will use this warehouse. But we know enough. 

I ask you to consider what the Mayor of Ohrdruf might have thought before he died. Maybe he felt like a victim. He might have thought, 'how is this my fault? I have no jurisdiction over this.' Maybe he would have said, 'this site was not subject to local zoning, what could I do?' 

But I think, when he reflected on the suffering that occurred at this camp, just outside of town, that those words would have sounded hollow even to him. Because in his heart he knew--as we do--that we are all responsible for what happens in our community. 

I urge the council to take action to stop, or stall, or at the barest minimum to think creatively about how to exercise oversight over this proposed ICE facility. Thank you."

[-] wuffah@lemmy.world 4 points 11 hours ago

I swear to god, these people see The Holocaust as a blueprint.

[-] ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 10 hours ago

I'm not even convinced that the people who are contesting actually give a shit. Just probably a bunch of NIMBYs who don't want to be around minorities.

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 19 points 17 hours ago

"Vast holding facilities" AKA concentration camps. They still mince their words, but their actions speak clear.

[-] ceenote@lemmy.world 90 points 22 hours ago

Will this be the thing that finally makes Trump's base abando-

Of course not, don't be ridiculous.

[-] whereIsTamara@lemmy.org 36 points 21 hours ago

Yeah they don’t care. Articles like this are lib clickbait “don’t revolt” propaganda. MAGA don’t even KNOW this is happening. Ask one, they’ll be like “What?” Or “yeah for Mexicans”

Ask them if they know the name Pretti, they’ll tell you they’re Pretti tired of your fake news.

[-] ceenote@lemmy.world 12 points 21 hours ago

It's a cult. They'll abandon him a decade or so after he dies.

[-] whereIsTamara@lemmy.org 13 points 20 hours ago

While I hope you’re right—they’re still saluting Hitler in 2026, so I think this might be a problem for a long time. Especially with how much media there is of him to brainwash future generations.

[-] Triasha@lemmy.world 1 points 7 minutes ago

That's the thing, they might retreat for an election cycle, but the propaganda network will have people voting for trumpists in the one after that.

People will get tired of guilt and they will band together re elect trump apologists. The next generation raised on stories of how great trump was will likely be even more dangerous. Trump is a fool and a megalomaniac, a slightly more competent trumpist with most of the charisma could show up any day after he is gone.

[-] notwhoyouthink@lemmy.zip 12 points 21 hours ago

Yeah until they see themselves in those that are being detained, they won’t give two shits.

Oh wait, they’re incapable of doing that because that would require the insight and empathy they see as detrimental to their existence.

[-] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 4 points 17 hours ago

If this ever ends (notice I said if, not when) right-wing people will still be oblivious that anything happened at all

[-] DJKJuicy@sh.itjust.works 25 points 18 hours ago

I don't think assuming that NIMBYs don't want something in "their backyard" for moral reasons is the right take. NIMBYs by definition are selfish and just don't want whatever it is near them. It's "Not In My BackYard".

The places in these red states are probably more than happy to have some more ICE mega-prisons, just in somebody else's backyard.

[-] dantheclamman@lemmy.world 7 points 17 hours ago

I took the same thing from this article as you. This is part of why Guantanamo Bay never closed; there was no place where the detainees' presence was tolerated. People don't want the object of their fear in their backyard. They want it as far away as possible. This is also why the six extermination camps like Auschwitz were not on German soil. Not in Germans' backyard.

[-] TheCriticalMember@aussie.zone 4 points 14 hours ago

Fun fact - when Obama declared that he was going to close Guantanamo Bay, mitch mcconnell decided that he would do whatever it took to keep it open, because his sole purpose for existing at that time was to obstruct Obama's policies. He did that in part by pushing legislation that made it illegal to transfer foreign detainees to American soil, effectively making it so that there was nowhere else to keep them. It was less to do with people tolerating detainees presence and more to do with mcconnell just gumming up the works because fuck Obama.

[-] dantheclamman@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Yes, McConnell was a big factor, but Democrats went along with him, and that was probably NIMBY-related https://www.npr.org/2009/05/20/104334339/democrats-block-funding-to-close-guantanamo

WELNA: Like Majority Leader Reid, Indiana Democrat Evan Bayh is up for reelection next year. He, too, opposes sending Guantanamo detainees to the U.S.

EVAN BAYH: We have a supermax facility in Terre Haute, Indiana. I don't think the citizens of my state would look too kindly on having those folks housed in our state.

[-] TheCriticalMember@aussie.zone 1 points 12 hours ago

Funny how republicans never have any problems finding enough democrats to support their shitty policies.

[-] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 8 points 18 hours ago

Exactly. These guys love prisons and detention centers, they just want them to be built somewhere else.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 6 points 18 hours ago

Yup. In some cases, I bet it is some of the very same dipshits in the hatriot movement that spent the 90s and 00s telling each other scary stories about FEMA death camps, and how Janet Reno, Hillary and Bill Clinton, and the black helicopters were coming for their penises, er, guns, and throw them into FEMA death camps so that the Socializms could be imposed on Murica.

I suppose it's probably all fine if it's being overseen by shitstains like Miller and Pedonald and if the (first) people being targeted are brown, black, liberal, trans, etc...

It's projection. It's ALWAYS projection. I'd love to see hatriots tracked over time and what they've supported under Donvict.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FEMA_camps_conspiracy_theory

[-] Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 32 points 20 hours ago

They're trying to build a prison, for you and me to live in

[-] kinther@lemmy.world 12 points 19 hours ago
[-] tootoughtoremember@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

For you and me, oh baby, you and meeeeee

[-] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 13 points 19 hours ago

Don't worry, they don't want us living in there for long.

Well your choice folks at this point. Die on your feet or on your knees.

[-] 3jane@piefed.ca 4 points 16 hours ago
[-] wolfeh@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 18 hours ago

"Did I say death camps? I meant happy camps."

[-] Furbag@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago

Lmao, the MAGAs lose to the ultimate buzz killer, the NIMBYs!

[-] uberdroog@lemmy.world 8 points 22 hours ago

Which Christian sect is the right one, asking for a friend?

[-] ceenote@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago

Trick question?

[-] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 3 points 21 hours ago

The one with the universal love stuff

[-] bstix@feddit.dk 0 points 17 hours ago

Would you believe anyone who told you?

Because that would be the actual problem.

An almighty God doesn't need humans or churches to spread the story.

[-] CreamyJalapenoSauce@piefed.social 5 points 20 hours ago

The only good NIMBYs can do

this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2026
236 points (99.6% liked)

politics

27957 readers
3101 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS