411

You can't touch a single police officer without them throwing a hissy fit and shutting everything down.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] myplacedk@lemmy.world 82 points 5 days ago

The countries I know of where employers have decent vacation etc and don't hate the employers, all have strong unions.

If unions doesn't work, then maybe you are doing it wrong.

[-] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 4 days ago

AFAICT not really true for Austria (where I live), we get 5 weeks of vacation, yet I don't hear very much about unions and am not myself a member of one

[-] ViatorOmnium@piefed.social 14 points 4 days ago

These things are subject to cycles. Things are shit, people unionize, things become a bit less shitty, people stop unionizing, things start getting shitty again, rinse and repeat. Most of Europe is ending the part of the cycle where people thought they didn't a union anymore.

[-] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 days ago

Honestly Austria is probably one of the exceptions to the rule. You've got a weird history with labor and economic systems post WW2 and even before that causes you guys to just kinda be doing your own thing. Hell I'm pretty sure Austria is the only occupied territories the Soviets just kinda allowed to leave their bloc.

[-] Dionysus@leminal.space 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Unions are for states (Nations) which are run for pure profit growth governments that focus on corporate health over humans.

Countries which have this baked in at the Government level typically don't need Unions because the government is the union.

That is not, and never has been the case in the US.

[-] escapeVelocity@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 days ago

They call them self a union but it's more of a guild.

[-] thermal_shock@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

FOP

fraternal order of police

When I talk to people they seem most upset that unions don't work for them. They feel a part of something so large that it doesn't care about them.

[-] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago

People aren’t opposed to unions because they think unions aren’t powerful, they’re opposed to unions because they’re powerful.

[-] reddit_sux@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

It is the rich and powerful who are opposed, the public is just afraid and brainwashed out of their own power.

[-] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

That’s not true though. I’ve talked to plenty of working class people who hate unions and hate dealing with union workers due to perceived laziness, bad work ethic, and the inability to fire bad workers.

Also plenty of unions are full of rich and powerful people: pilots unions, doctors unions, actors unions, sports athletes unions.

[-] Comrade_Squid@lemmy.ml 11 points 4 days ago

People parroting this are falling for the capitalist propaganda. Unions work so well that the ruling class has employed a mass campaign against unions. That isn't weakness.

We the working class keep our society running, we can shut our society down, and this scares the shit out of the ruling classes who while wealthy in assets, are weak in number.

[-] bluGill@fedia.io 18 points 4 days ago

Unions work depending on how 'in it together' you feel.

If you resent the people standing around doing nothing they start to fail. If you resent the people who do worse work than you for the same pay they start to fail. note that on an assembly line the above isn't possible in the first place - which is why they work great there. (Bus drivers and police are also not really measureable like that)

[-] ClownStatue@piefed.social 2 points 4 days ago

To me, this is an area where some unions could really make up some ground with conservatives and liberals. The instinct to rally around members can be detrimental to the overall goal of the union when that member has been proven to be a bad employee. I’ve never been in a union, so I’m guessing the stereotype of lazy union workers is probably overblown; but I’m sure there are examples that reinforce it.

[-] tburkhol@lemmy.world 17 points 4 days ago

I suspect that some of the 'lazy union worker' stereotype is workers following their contract and refusing to do non-contracted work, which is, of course, essential to maintaining the value of that contract. Pride in your own work/trade doesn't mean cleaning up after the other trades; professionalism in your own work doesn't mean unpaid overtime to fix someone else's fuckup.

[-] IronBird@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

one of the biggest tools used in america to break unions is creating a 2-tier workforce (incentivizes one group deciding to work less-hard, which builds resentment) and by purposefully lowering hiring standards. lotta unions in the US really are complacent, seemingly having forgotten that these same capitalists they regularly fail to bargain with have literally attempted to murder them multiple times within living memory.

when all you know is the farm...you don't realize just how much better it could be, i guess.

[-] Willoughby@piefed.world 12 points 4 days ago

Unions aren't possible at my company.

1/3 speaks Spanish, 1/3 speaks some African dialect only they understand, and the other 1/3 speak english, and the entire culture aims eachother's hate at eachother.

This is America.

Ashley Furniture btw. Full on bodyslam under the bus.

[-] Samskara@sh.itjust.works 12 points 4 days ago

This is how immigration is used to divide the workers.

[-] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Aren't they the new wayfair?

Wayfair is based in my city and notorious for treating their employees like absolute crap and doing the 'up or out' business model that only rewards people who work 80hour weeks

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 12 points 4 days ago

In a capitalist world unions will always exist because there will never be any laws to protect the producer of capital (the worker). Imagine how much union dues could go back into the worker's pocket if they were protected by their government?

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

In a capitalist world unions will always exist because there will never be any laws to protect the producer of capital

so we're living in the real world here

[-] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

i dont think police unions count, they are gang/mafia that can browbeat a city to giving what it wants(they can refuse to actual do anything about specific crimes if they so chose), its fully supported by the gop and dnc, because they can use to keep the general population at arms length. it was discussed many times on subs, how they arnt like voted on or have grassroots upbringing.

[-] reddit_sux@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

This can be countered by having non local cops in the mix, having frequent transfers of cops.

Yes these can be seen as union busting.

Unions are good and they work. But just as any good things in excess it becomes poison.

[-] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 7 points 4 days ago

The only issue with Unions is a corporate system that has spent decades on a campaign of misinformation and vilification.

Never forget that its unions that gave you a five day work week, 8 hour days, and child labour laws.

Nothing is given by a corporation out of the kindness of their heart. And nothing makes them more gleeful than listening to people repeat their anti-union screed.

[-] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 days ago

What other unions protect their members from murder charges?

[-] GreenShimada@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago

This is true, though police unions typically leverage the "fuck you all" nature of being a union, that Dems won't touch, and being police, that the GOP won't touch. So no one stops policies that give wacky amounts of leave.

[-] reddit_sux@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

That should be the attitude of all unions

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 4 days ago

police

they are used to enforce the status quo of both parties.

[-] GreenShimada@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

In some cities, typically heavily Democrat ones like Chicago and LA, they're the monopoly holders, and push their own politics up and force the City Council to take it or accept the political costs of fucking with a union or of fucking with the perception of security and crime. Police unions flip everything you think you know about unions on its head. Unlike normal worker unions, the city can't close up shop and move if the labor costs get too high. And yet in many large cities police are incredibly ineffectual at everything short of harassing the general public over smalltime BS because it's easy for them.

Ironically, another Chicago union, the Teacher's Union, treats themselves with the same level of monopolistic power occasionally, and then asks for a raise and gets smacked down quickly because no one actually cares about schools or learning. Even though most residents support the Teacher's Union, they are nothing close to holding the same power as the Police Union.

[-] menas@lemmy.wtf 2 points 4 days ago

When workers unions are in arms, they are very effective too

[-] minorkeys@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

And they only got there by striking and work actions because the nature of their positions gave them the leverage needed to be effective. The NYPD can't ship the factory to another country or bring in immigrant labour to do policing. If they aren't policing, property rights won't be enforced for businesses. Leverage. The police are the mechanism that break labour strikes and protests on behalf of capital. There is no such mechanism to break a police strike or protest, except the feds or the military which won't be used.

Most labour jobs do not have this kind of leverage because technology shrank the world and business has negotiated trade deal that give them the freedom to undermine worker leverage. Workers have no leverage to force capitulation. Labour has long lost any control they had to influence business practices and fight for themselves. Labour actions would have to be across the entire company to effectively force capitulation and that is next to impossible because labour ain't a community anymore thanks to anti-commie fear mongering. Every union is isolated, every location is separated, every company the corporate owns is independent from each other. Labour is too divided to stand united and united is the only way it effectively works. A group can't fight individual power with individual power, it must fight with collective power and for that, it needs to be united first.

[-] admin@lemmy.today 2 points 4 days ago

Union doesn't work because there is so much competition in my country that anybody going out of line will be replaced

[-] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

That's exactly why a union will work.

I guess if you work at a company where they could replace 100% of the staff without losing money, then yeah, a union wouldn't work.

[-] reddit_sux@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

This is exactly what unions are meant to prevent, hire and fire.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] theyoyomaster@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Are you going to argue that police unions are a net good? They are the reason we have impenetrable qualifed immunity for even ridiculously egregious misconduct and any time a cop is shown to actually go over the absurdly strict line of what they can be held legally accountable for, the unions protect them at all costs. The reason criminal cops can just get hired at any other PD and their past is covered up/ignored is the police unions. I’m not saying they don’t do good things, but the bad they do is way too much to overlook.

With the legal authority police have, they need to be held to higher standards than the average person, instead the unions voraciously fight to ensure there are virtually zero standards for police conduct.

[-] Sharkticon@lemmy.zip 5 points 4 days ago

There's very clearly no indication that they are implying police unions are good, they're implying they are effective. Which is inarguable.

[-] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 4 days ago

they have cities by the stranglehold, got crime, cant have that and need to pay police, got Rich persons property, IP under threat they need them too.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 0 points 4 days ago

All unions should carry guns and exercise lethal force on a daily basis.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2026
411 points (97.5% liked)

Showerthoughts

40280 readers
843 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS