17
submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by BlueMonday1984@awful.systems to c/techtakes@awful.systems

Want to wade into the snowy surf of the abyss? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid.

Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned so many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

(Credit and/or blame to David Gerard for starting this. A lot of people didn't survive January, but at least we did. This also ended up going up on my account's cake day, too, so that's cool.)

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] gerikson@awful.systems 4 points 4 hours ago
[-] Amoeba_Girl@awful.systems 2 points 1 hour ago
[-] Amoeba_Girl@awful.systems 3 points 1 hour ago

warming up on philosophy with Simulacra and Simulation

oh no baby what are you doing

[-] Amoeba_Girl@awful.systems 3 points 53 minutes ago* (last edited 50 minutes ago)

some important characters in the narrative I've completely skipped over, mostly to do with the Nature of Art (in society) subplot, because nothing actually happens in them and it's all social parties and talking

you ... mother ... fucker ... so not only did you manage to miss the fact that this is a gay book, you completely skipped past one if not the most important theme in the novel which is language and the way people talk and write and the various ways they conduct themselves in different times and places, but oh nothing happens it's just people talking aaaaaaaaaa

also this is a funny book! it's funny! it's not all maudlin meditations upon time and memory! fuck you!

[-] swlabr@awful.systems 2 points 1 hour ago

Username is one “t” off from being an anagram for enteritis

[-] gerikson@awful.systems 3 points 1 hour ago

I happen to know there are multiple translations of the novel into English, and I'm confused as to why the reviewer refers to

My copy was the 2016 Moncrieff/Schiff English translation

which doesn't really mesh with anything here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_Search_of_Lost_Time#English-language_translations

Not that it matters much in the end.

[-] swlabr@awful.systems 2 points 1 hour ago

I’d chalk it up to the LWer inability to a) summarise and/or summarise accurately, and/or LLM usage.

[-] mirrorwitch@awful.systems 4 points 2 hours ago

I feel like I just read someone reviewing Toccata and Fugue in D Minor by complaining that there's no upbeat sections and no overall chorus and the song isn't about anything, that we're just "tossed about on the storms of emotion that by the end we are all seasick to"

[-] o7___o7@awful.systems 10 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Tangentially on topic:

Just finished The Regicide Report by friend of the instance Charles Stross. Hell of a finish to the main series! I'll likely start a re-read of the whole series soon, and I'm hopeful that it'll win all the awards.

Had a couple of shower thoughts afterward:

  1. In the previous novel, a bunch of American computer bois with brainworms concocted a plan to disassemble the moon and turn it into orbital datacenters, which is lol

  2. Ghislaine Maxwell is the Iris Carpenter of pedos.

  3. Keeping speculative fiction ahead of current events must be exhausting.

[-] cstross@wandering.shop 13 points 17 hours ago

@o7___o7 @techtakes That's why I'm fleeing screaming back to the arms of far-future space opera ATM.

Today in excellent cold opens: "I didn't talk to ChatGPT, I never have. Instead, I took a load of edibles and laid down in the driveway with the hose on. I produced nothing of value and wasted a ton of water, but at least I ate three protein bars so I'm so healthy."

[-] froztbyte@awful.systems 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

that one in which the person behind/running @FirefoxWebDevs drops the mask so fast it looks like a magic trick: gallery link

thread by @self, toots by myself and others. the poster managed to keep their civility for quite a while until I dared(tm) to highlight their lack of a reply outside of UK 5pm, at which point they immediately ramped up

(and based on some screenshots I’ve been sent, he’s also been doing the classic tail-darvo moping elsewhere)

[-] froztbyte@awful.systems 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

for those who hadn’t seen before, FWD is an account that showed up on the fedi not too long ago (3~4mo?), and has been acting as a Mouthpiece (and semi consent manufacturing outlet)

across a number of “polls” (with forced answer paths) they’ve had their replies absolutely blasted, and across literally hundreds of replies they’ve dodged the point so hard they might have invented a new sports class

earlier today I attempted to (quite lightly) check with them if they understand why their responses aren’t all-liked. it didn’t take much of long for them to go off the rails

[-] o7___o7@awful.systems 4 points 1 day ago

Thanks for lighting his ass on fire. o7

[-] froztbyte@awful.systems 4 points 19 hours ago

and it wasn't even my goal to do that! couple of replies across hours, trying to see if this guy is capable of ... irunno, unassing their head(?) and engaging with the criticisms

then the subtlest thing set them off and shit went mask off so fast

but hey, at least this way we now just know and don't have to guess. so much easier

[-] o7___o7@awful.systems 5 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

The vibes were wretched. Why do people to have to battle emotional abuse from a goddamned web browser?

but hey, at least this way we now just know and don’t have to guess. so much easier

+1, yeesh. Btw, if Dingus McGee there resides in the UK, might some of that shit might be legally actionable? I'd certainly have strong feelings about being defamed by the representative of a rather well-funded technology company lol

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] BlueMonday1984@awful.systems 9 points 1 day ago

Found another website doing a good job keeping eye on the slop machines and their promoters: The AI Dirty List.

It also lists those who have fought against the bullshit fountains as well.

[-] sc_griffith@awful.systems 7 points 1 day ago

new odium symposium episode. this one is a lot lighter than the previous two. we went back and looked at joseph swetnam, the guy the word misogyny was coined to describe, and how he got relentlessly dunked on by his peers.

https://www.patreon.com/posts/9-first-149546072, or on any platform

[-] rook@awful.systems 12 points 2 days ago

Bit early to celebrate, but every bit of grit in the wheels of the llm machine is welcome: Microsoft is walking back Windows 11’s AI overload — scaling down Copilot and rethinking Recall in a major shift

  • recall might be rethought, again
  • copilot integration in the most stupid places (notepad, paint, maybe others) “under review”
  • no new copilot integration with other tools that ship with windows

Still plenty of other ai projects going full steam ahead, but promotion in plenty of tech companies and especially microsoft comes with being associated with a product launch, and if you’re smart what happens after the launch is someone else’s problem. I wouldn’t be surprised to see plenty of this stiff clinging on until it reaches consumers, and then being immediately “scaled back”.

[-] BioMan@awful.systems 5 points 1 day ago

Does (deservedly) mercilessly bullying Slopya Nadella actually work?

[-] o7___o7@awful.systems 9 points 1 day ago

R3call

Buisness plan: daily reminders to Recall the Recall Recall. It's memento mori for CEOs as a service.

[-] o7___o7@awful.systems 19 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Re datacenters in space:

Multiple hackernews insist that SpaceX must have discovered new physics that solves orbital heat management, because otherwise Musk and the stockholders are dumb.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46862222

Edit: may have gotten the ol URL switcharoo:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46862170

Current top comment is nice (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46862435):

it is possible to put 500 to 1000 TW/year of AI satellites into deep space, meaningfully ascend the Kardashev scale and harness a non-trivial percentage of the Sun’s power

We currently make around 1 TW of photovoltaic cells per year, globally. The proposal here is to launch that much to space every 9 hours, complete with attached computers, continuously, from the moon.

edit: Also, this would capture a very trivial percentage of the Sun's power. A few trillionths per year.

[-] scruiser@awful.systems 8 points 1 day ago

Multiple hackernews insist that SpaceX must have discovered new physics that solves orbital heat management, because otherwise Musk and the stockholders are dumb.

The leaps in logic are so idiotic "he managed to land a rocket up right, so maybe he can pull it off!" (as if Elon personally made that happen, or as if a engineering challenge and fundamental thermodynamic limits are equally solvable). This is despite multiple comments replying with back of the envelope calcs on energy generation and heat dissipation of the ISS and comparing it to what you would need for even a moderately sized data center. Or even the comments that are like "maybe there is a chance", as if it is wiser to express uncertainty...

[-] V0ldek@awful.systems 14 points 2 days ago

SpaceX must have discovered new physics that solves orbital heat management, because otherwise Musk and the stockholders are dumb.

Truly a conundrum worthy of the XXI century

[-] o7___o7@awful.systems 3 points 1 day ago

Very much "sweaty guy hovering over two buttons"

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2026
17 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

2412 readers
104 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS