384
submitted 3 days ago by robocall@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 40 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] thlibos 92 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Oh my, so the Trump Kompromot is real!

[-] IronBird@lemmy.world 42 points 3 days ago

starting to sound like a hooker piss video is the least offensive thing he might have done, considering that'd be atleast somewhat consensual right?

[-] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

This is actually starting to make more sense. The whole Russian hotel/piss video thing always sounded like a weak variety of dirt to me. But if Epstein collected video or other proof that Trump was fucking children, and then gave that to the kremlin... Well that is quite damaging information. That is leverage.

[-] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 3 points 2 days ago

Epstein did advise Putin in 2018, how to control TRUMP, and i would imagine it would evidence of child raping.

[-] IronBird@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

pedophilia does seem like the one line western culture can't accept being crossed, least once it's our in the open and putting their head in the sand doesn't work anymore

[-] duncan_bayne@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

at least somewhat consensual right?

Only if he weren't on fire.

[-] saltesc@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago

Doubt it. There's no way to piss would've wanted to touch him.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 35 points 3 days ago

Wasn't Epstein with Mossad?

[-] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 17 points 3 days ago

Now confirmed

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 39 points 3 days ago

How does this square with his Israeli ties?

[-] sramder@lemmy.world 38 points 3 days ago

Sounds like homeslice was playing every angle to me… selling secrets to the Israeli government on the side, working for the oligarchs as his main gig, and boffing Maxi-max just for fun. Truly a multitasker of the lowest order.

Fuck me… I sound mad as a hatter. Happy Sunday y’all. God bless America 🪨🇺🇸🦅

[-] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 18 points 3 days ago

He was not the spider in the middle of the web pulling the strings. He had people above him.

[-] sramder@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

I mean… dude might have just liked bony MILFs, but IMHO it still takes an above average juggler to keep that many huge balls in the air 😉

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

selling secrets to the Israeli government on the side

I don't think it was on the side. The Israelis, the Brits, and the Americans were his primary clientele.

Bob Barr's father - one of the OG CIA guys under Dulles - was the guy who recruited him out of school. And Robert Maxwell was deep in with MI5 when he started seeing Ghislaine.

[-] Deceptichum@quokk.au 8 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I was reading an article recently mentioning how Russia keeps tabs on its Jewish population through some Israeli org. Lemme go find it.

Edit: Hmmm can’t find it again. Might be in my search history when I get home. But there was a clear link between Russia and Israeli intelligence.

[-] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 2 days ago

i wouldnt be surprised, they keep an eye on the muslim population too.

[-] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

He was first and foremost an opportunist. So, just like any american bourgeois.

[-] vivalapivo@lemmy.today 3 points 2 days ago

Slop article

I am shocked. Shocked, I tell you. Truly, nobody could have seen this coming, despite copious evidence going back decades.

[-] TwodogsFighting@lemdro.id 2 points 3 days ago

I miss Bernie.

[-] thlibos 1 points 3 days ago

I miss Bernie Mac.

[-] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 8 points 3 days ago
компромат
[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

websites with anti-fake sections don't smell reputable to me

edit: i think i'm quibbling over semantics. i'd call it rus-prop or something, but ask 5 interpreters for the same thing interpreted and you'll get 18 different interpretations.

[-] robocall@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

It's a Ukrainian government outlet. So definitely keen to highlight anything negative about Russia.

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

gotcha i think it might be a translation issue then?

[-] WesternInfidels@feddit.online 5 points 3 days ago

Can you expand on this? What does "anti-fake" mean to you, what does it mean to them? Is this something a lot of news outlets have? Is this the only one? I've never heard of this and I'm confused.

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

See I'm confused by it too. I clicked on the link and there's an anti fake section. Dude says it's Ukrainian gov so I'll give it a grain of salt but I'm not sure.

The section is more visible on desktop than mobile, that may be the thing

[-] WesternInfidels@feddit.online 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

The articles under the "anti-fake" heading seem to mostly be about illuminating and countering Russian propaganda efforts, Russian disinformation campaigns, Russian media subversion, etc.

"Anti-fake" is a term that has apparently been applied to official legislative efforts to counter propaganda, disinfo, and media subversion around the world. I hadn't heard the term before, but I'm not seeing anything inherently suspect about it, under the circumstances.

Maybe it's just an appropriate response to the times.

[-] CXORA@aussie.zone 2 points 3 days ago
[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Well, aside from the huge "do not pay attention to the man behind the curtain" that this entire article reeks of? freakin daily mail source. I can name no other news service that has it

[-] CXORA@aussie.zone 2 points 3 days ago
[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

~~is that how they spell fact check in ukraini wow. because reuters' section is completely different.~~

semantic quibbling. retracted.

[-] sundray@lemmus.org 8 points 3 days ago
[-] Maeve@kbin.earth 2 points 2 days ago

Still don't see photos of incriminating email?

[-] Maeve@kbin.earth 2 points 3 days ago

I keep seeing this story but haven't seen any supporting documents.

[-] whereIsTamara@lemmy.org 1 points 3 days ago
[-] DeepThought42@lemmy.world 62 points 3 days ago

On one hand this sounds plausible, but on the other the article cites the Daily Mail, which is far as I'm concerned isn't the most credible source of factual information. I'll hold my judgement until this is corroborated by more reliable sources.

[-] Formfiller@lemmy.world 39 points 3 days ago

Funny how our media always fails to mention Israel

[-] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 23 points 3 days ago

"Epstein ran a honeypot for former Ottoman Empire territories" is probably the best we'd get.

[-] Alwaysnownevernotme@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

"huh I guess you can just buy a Fidel Castro hat?"

this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2026
384 points (96.6% liked)

News

35349 readers
3176 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS