30
all 42 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] circuscritic@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Within the same paragraph, this article's author dismisses the RT audience score as right-wing review bombing, and then holds up the absurdly inflated RT critics rating, that is full of media shills whose primary function is to boost ratings of the slop coming out of the major studios.

Well I'm a socialist, and a casual enjoyer of Star Trek i.e. not a Trekkie, and I thought this show was complete and utter dog shit.

It's a white label CW teen soap with a Star Trek label slapped on it.

The show's writers clearly either don't like Star Trek, don't understand it, or just don't care.

Oh no, does this mean I'm now MAGA?

[-] TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 1 week ago

Doesn't feel right to me. The premier didn't leave me wanting more. It feels like a step back towards Disco after the great leaps forward of Strange New Worlds and Lower Decks.

[-] reddig33@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

It’s strange that they doubled down on ”Discovery: The Sequel” and expected success. It reminds me of when everyone hated the Star Trek Enterprise theme song, so instead of replacing it the producers just “jazzed it up”.

[-] tiramichu@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago

And the "jazzed up" version just made it worse.

[-] The_Che_Banana@beehaw.org 9 points 1 week ago

Eh...I thought it was a charming show. Not much substance, but charming.

[-] Encephalotrocity@feddit.online 10 points 1 week ago

It felt like watching the WB. It's aiming for teen demo and I'm... not that.

[-] The_Che_Banana@beehaw.org 7 points 1 week ago

Yes. that's exactly it.

[-] HubertManne@piefed.social 9 points 1 week ago

any idea what is meant by backlash?

[-] Canconda@lemmy.ca 20 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Its the word they use to fabricate engagement when in reality nobody is watching.

[-] etherphon@midwest.social 17 points 1 week ago

I dunno about the attacks, I watched the first few and I thought it was okay but it's just another school/college/university/academy version of a show, doesn't feel like boldly going where no one has gone before. I don't have any problem with it persay just eh.

[-] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 week ago

My friend says it reminds him of Harry Potter

[-] etherphon@midwest.social 2 points 1 week ago

Haha yeah a bit Harry Potter in Space.

[-] IWW4@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 week ago

If by backlash, the article means people don’t want a terrible show, than yeah it is a backlash.

This show is just so bad.

[-] tiramichu@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Lol yeah, as if to say it's somehow not the fault of the show that it's bad, but the fault of the audience for not liking it.

[-] TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 week ago

This is Paramount's song and dance for all the new Trek shows that fail to land. They get a few big names to say "It's Just Like The Shows You Love!" and then blame malicious actors for the poor reception.

It's so exhausting.

[-] Squatcher@piefed.social 4 points 1 week ago

I watched first episode of discovery it seemed good what goes so wrong? (I don't care about spoilers)

[-] Redacted@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 week ago

For me it was way too quipy. Felt like i was watching a marvel movie.

[-] Squatcher@piefed.social 2 points 1 week ago

Ok got it they marvel fied star trek

[-] Redacted@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 week ago

It really did feel like "Disney presents: Star Trek"

[-] PedroMaldonado@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

WTF? What do you people want????

[-] reddig33@lemmy.world 33 points 1 week ago

A show about competent people exploring the universe?

[-] JessyKenning@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

They cancelled lower decks.

[-] TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone 24 points 1 week ago

Yeah the competence porn of TNG is very comforting in this insane times.

[-] TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Star Trek Deep Space Nine 2, of course.

I want episodic sci-fi plots with an ensemble cast and minimal, yet still present, slow burn character growth and world building.

I want a show that in one episode is willing to say the entirety of American culture is wantonly racist and the next be about playing baseball in VR, all complete with semi-stage play-style, scenery chewing acting. Giamatti delivered on that part, to be fair, but it just felt so mismatched with the rest of the chaos.

[-] Redacted@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 week ago

I just want garrick back tbh, and quark. Those two completely stole the show.

[-] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago

If we were only 4 episodes into DS9's original airing, people would be losing their minds complaining about how terrible of a show it is. The first season was terrible.

[-] JessyKenning@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

I watched the series premiere back in the day. It was phenomenal. You exist here. It is not linear.

Duet is still hands down one of the best episodes of tv ever.

Dramatis Personae made one mistake and that was it was shown too early in the show for the casts amazing performance.

Dax was a good courthouse show. The Nagus was a good episode. Progress is a slow but good episode dealing with how a former freedom fighter has to learn to compromise.

I'll admit season one isn't as good as what follows but I'm not ready to say it was even close to terrible.

Now, since we brought up DS9 (ty btw), I'd like to point something out. Tawny Newsome is listed as a producer in the credits for academy, she's a huge DS9 fan. This last academy ep I had to hear Vance deliver the line "May the Klingon gods help us." There are times when producers probably should pass notes down, and this was one. The Klingons killed their gods. Tawny, you should have spoke up.

[-] TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 week ago

That is a phenomenal point

[-] IWW4@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago

We were saying that.

[-] tomenzgg@midwest.social 2 points 1 week ago

Compared to TNG's first season, it was prestige T. V. (O. K., maybe not that good; but I had no problem watching it without having to try again, later).

Come on, you were so close when you almost said Babylon 5.

[-] TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 week ago

I don't know what DS9's secret sauce is because I've tried to get into Babylon 5 a few times and it never hooks me. I don't think it can be just the cultural cache of Star Trek, but it's something.

Don't get me wrong man, I binge star trek routinely. I'm currently hopping between DS9 and Voyager.

B5 just hits harder in a different way. It elicits an emotional response with the finale that tops even the most soul crushing anime like Your lie in April and Angel Beats. It has tons of parallels to today's world and the story goes well beyond a bite sized episode.

It's got it's flaws. There are plenty of episodes that are rough patches especially in S1, and S5 can be very meh, but for it's time it's a marvel. In a world of sitcoms and one offs it delivered a story with tons of plots that go beyond just a two part episode. It's a show that feels way more modern in good ways despite the low resolution and relatively small budget.

Like any show though, it's not for everyone. It never got the mass appeal that star trek attained, but it feels like a much more realistic future than star trek will ever be unfortunately.

[-] Rakonat@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Something that isn't form over substance.

Nu Trek is all about looking flashy without any real thought put past that. The stories and themes are poorly written and presented, characters that should be highly trained professionals acting like they just graduated high school last week and maybe skimmed the chapter names of their particular profession. Contradictory retcons of established lore for no real reason than the writer thought it would be cool.

[-] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago

I want more Strange New Worlds, not more Discovery.

[-] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago
[-] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

Or even post-voyager, that's fine too.

[-] IWW4@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago

.. A show that is good.

This show is terrible.

[-] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 week ago

Agreed. We finally get a show set in the future with a cast that doesn't bring back characters we already know and people are allegedly up in arms about it. Perhaps they need another series set around ST:TOS with Spock and Kirk since we don't have enough of that already.

[-] CCMan1701A@startrek.website 0 points 1 week ago

This show is fine, but i hope they get back to space soon

[-] Seasm0ke@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I watched the first episode thought it could go either way, but I liked it. Not sure what the hate is but maybe EP 2 and 3 will suck most first seasons of treks got a lot of hate, even TNG.

In fact the only good first seasons were SNW and TOS

this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2026
30 points (94.1% liked)

Television

3515 readers
475 users here now

Welcome to Television

This community is for discussion of anything related to television or streaming.

Other Communities

Television Communities

A community for discussion of anything related to Television via broadcast or streaming.

Rules:

  1. Be respectful and courteous to all members.
  2. Avoid offensive or discriminatory remarks.
  3. Avoid spamming or promoting unrelated products/services.
  4. Avoid personal attacks or engaging in heated arguments.
  5. Do not engage in any form of illegal activity or promote illegal content.
  6. Please mask any and all spoilers with spoiler tags.

Matrix Link

List of Best Rated TV Series as voted by the Fediverse

founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS