this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2023
109 points (95.8% liked)

Palestine

989 readers
63 users here now

A community for everything related to Palestine and the occupation currently underway by the occupying force known as Israel.

Anti-Zionism is not anti-Semitism. Existence is resistance for Palestinians.

Please refer to Israel as Occupied Palestine, or occupied territories. The IDF is a fascist and ethnonationalist occupying force. Israelis are settlers. We understand however that the imperial narrative (which tries to legitimise Israel) is internalised in the imperial core and slip-ups are naturally expected.

We always take the sides of Palestine and Palestinians and are unapologetic about it. Israel is an occupying power whose "defence force"'s (note the contradiction) sole purpose for existing is to push Palestinians out so they can resettle their rightful land. If you have anything positive to say about Israel we do not care.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
all 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 62 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It's just utterly beautiful how Western™ solutions are utterly powerless against people with barely any resources who are just determined

[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 year ago

They're far from powerless, but far from invincible, too.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 year ago (1 children)

the west has always been a paper tiger

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago

They don't call it power projection for nothing

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago

The pathetic Western arsenal fills you with determination.

[–] [email protected] 61 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Something something, the Soviets beat the Nazis because Soviet tanks were cheaper to produce and maintain though not necessarily better than the Nazi tanks, which were expensive and difficult to maintain because profits were more important than winning an actual war to the capitalist Nazis than to the communist Soviets. That’s one reason anyway.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 year ago

history repeats as a farce :)

[–] [email protected] 54 points 1 year ago (2 children)

she dome on my iron til it's depleted

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

volcel-judge

Volcel Police

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago

She launch missiles at my iron dome til it’s depleted.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Some cope I hear out of some old zionist supporter I know in regards to the tin foil dome getting domed is how the Israelis somehow perfected laser beams and can shoot down missiles with flashlights powered by their unlimited power supply, and I'm sitting there listening like huh

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

lol I've seen this bs too, maybe Israel secretly cracked fusion to power these lasers 😂

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago

Iron Beam? So they're going to throw girders at the rockets, like Donkey Kong.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Wonder how effective that is, actually.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You remember back in WWII when Nazi Germany was making goofy ahh weapons

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Frantic, delusional, desperate. As good a sign as one's knees buckling.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Honestly laser defenses against rockets are not the craziest idea in the world, you definitely reduce the amount of debris. However, they just started deploying that system like this week I believe, so it is basically untested in real world scenarios. I doubt it was ready to be used yet.

It could be a surprise success but I doubt it. Might work a bit better against slower moving targets that are easier to track, like drones. I also would wonder how often it can be fired. It's pulling a lot of power per firing, I doubt it can be rapid-fired in the volume they'd need to intercept the volume of Hamas rockets being fired.

Even if it worked perfectly, it would still cost several times the cost of a hamas rocket per firing.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

The main issues tend to be that lasers need clear weather conditions, which likely isn't a problem there, the power consumption, and heat dissipation. The other two problems are kinda hard to solve. If you're intercepting one or two missiles, it works fine, but if you have thousands coming in then the system either overheats or it needs more electricity than you can produce.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Even extremely hot lasers, you have to keep trained on a single spot to have them burn through anything. The idea that you could reliably do this on a spinning, flying rocket in realtime seems pretty incredible.

Laser beams are also generally easily defeated by fog or smoke or clouds, which is already abundant in any warzone but which could surely be easily added as a countermeasure.

If these things work at all, there are likely many caveats.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

To add to this, the alternative to trying to slow burn through a rocket like you mentioned is to use pulse lasers, but not only do they still suffer from blooming, they're also a massive power drain by comparison and unlikely to be viable for long because of that

[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I remember when Ukraine was pissed off that Israel wouldn't give them an Iron Dome system. farquaad-point

To me, it was always obvious the much ballyhooed Iron Dome wasn't that effective, because it even let the puny Palestinian rockets through pretty frequently. Now imagine if someone fired at them with an actual military-grade rocket battery.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 year ago

Exactly, the thing can barely shoot down home made pop rockets, it has no chance against actual missiles a professional military uses. Giving Iron Dome to Ukraine would've exposed it for the sham that it is, and would also be costly as fuck. Israel decided to avoid the obvious PR disaster. It would've basically been the repeat of the Patriot debacle. My fav part about it was how it fires like 30 missiles each costing a few million in a space of a couple of minutes, and still failed to intercept the kinzhal. It was immediately shown to be equal parts ineffective and unsustainable as a means of air defence.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 year ago

I've mentioned this was going to happen, the same thing happenes in 2012 and since then they've amassed a bigger stockpile but at the same time never Hamas has attacked as this time so the stockpile lasted longer but still not enough.

According to Ronen Bergman, in 2012, during Operation Pillar of Defense, Israel agreed to an early cease-fire "for a reason that has remained a closely guarded secret: The Iron Dome anti-missile defense system... had run out of ammunition." Bergman says that as a result of the experience, Israel had tried to prepare larger stocks of interceptors for future rounds of fighting.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 year ago

Let's just leave it to the free market to solve this by fostering a spirit of innovation and competition. I can wait.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 year ago (3 children)

80k for a missile is absolutely insane 😂

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Isn't that cheap actually? Patriot SAM is 4 mil a shot

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's still crazy nonetheless lol.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah I don't mean to say it's cheap in the absolute sense, just relative to other anti air missiles. Even non-western missiles like S300 are 1 mil a missile

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago

I might be misremembering, but doesn't the iron dome rely pretty heavily on volume of missiles being shot as a defensive response rather than precision accuracy? Meaning each missile might "only" be 80k but they are launching like a dozen of them?

80k is still hundreds of times more than the rockets Hamas is using anyway.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

what the fuck? seriously?

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

80k for a missile

This can mean only one thing... Israel's national security depends on the US dollar collapsing :inshallah:

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How so? What do you mean by collapsing? Where can I read more about it?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

I was kind of teasing in suggesting that the only way Israel would be able to afford enough missiles is if the US dollar wasn’t worth anything

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

That’s extremely cheap, most modern munitions are hundreds of thousands, if not millions of dollars.

Even a 70’s rinky dink Soviet Strela-2 MANPAD is $120,000 per unit.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

For reference, you can buy a decent > 300hp tractor for 80k. Isnt it absurd that these expendable missiles are on the same price range as a whole damn tractor 😂

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Even putting aside the obvious grift/profit factor of these being made by capitalist companies, the raw materials and engineering that goes into making something that can maneuver at Mach 10 while trying to hit a moving target also moving at Mach 10 aren't cheap.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago

A massive amount of the cost comes from the computers, miniaturized guidance and targeting systems, the immense engineering and comp-sci R&D behind those devices, and the sheer difficulty of designing good explosives.

Even dumb bombs are expensive if you don't want them to dud, explode randomly, not be aerodynamic, and so on.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago

Just like how capitalism will lead us, unlimited money does not mean unlimited resources.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago

L O fucking L

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The iron dome is a joke compared to the S-300, never mind the S-400.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago

oh yeah it's not even remotely comprable

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago

Once the global south finds a remedy for this and air power, like they have tanks... It's over.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nearly a century of Katyushas killing Nazis. May all fascists fear Stalin's organ.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Just remembering that this exists.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago