Fuck trump
post
A "nato member" threatens invading another NATO member ......
Well Europe, we'd better gear up. Although I don't have much hope for us now our spineless 'leaders' don't even dare to call the Venezuela illegal (let alone an act of war)
I really dislike the narrative 'eu can't leave nato' / 'eu can't push back on the us because we need them. I'd really like to know:
- how true this is
- how much the people in control want to change this
- how long it will take to change this
The eu can't allow itself to be treated like this, but also can't allow itself to be forced into a passive stance of having to agree. The eu needs to be able to stand up to this bully (and all the others).
'eu canβt push back on the us because we need them
The question is: For what do we need them?
They certainly will not respect Article 5 of the NATO treaty. They do not respect the sovereignty of the Kingdom of Denmark. They will use any(!) leverage they have against us, no matter what we do. What do we get for playing nice? Nothing! If I look at Starmer, Merz, Kallas, ...., it looks like Chamberlain 2.0 and we know from experience that this will not work.
Maybe we buy some time but I do not see attempts to end the dependency. All I see is the hope that everything will be ok once Trump is gone. I doubt it.
The question is: For what do we need them?
For everyday life mostly payment processors and IT infrastructure. For both of them there's some change in the plans, but it's painfully slow and with the orange toddler it's a reasonable threat to assume that those might vanish from EU overnight if there's even moderate push for any change which he doesn't like.
Then there's obviously international trade, support for sanctions against Russia, support for Ukraine (whatever's left of it) and a ton of other things, but specially Visa and Mastercard are pretty important part of everyday life for Joe Averages around Europe.
Well nato membership isn't an eu thing. It's up to induvidual countries.
And they can leave, an exit protocol exists. More likely they mean "we are not ready to accept the implications of leaving"
The us thing is probably the dependancy of us produced weaponry
I propose a kind of peaceful ring exchange - Greenland to the US, Alaska to Canada, California to Denmark and Texas to Mexico. Yellowstone goes to the Vatican so they can prevent an eruption with prayers. The British kingdoms then go to Ireland, with the exception of Scotland, which goes to Bavaria because of cultural similarities.
Have we forgotten anything? Oh yes. Russia goes to Ukraine. For reparations reasons alone.
The most sane suggestion in international geopolitics since a very long time!
Donβt forget that Hawaii should go to Iceland due to volcanic brotherhood (and to give the Icelandics an opportunity to get a tan). And NYC goes back to the Netherlands if theyβll take it (think how expensive it would be to add all the bike lanes).
β¦ with the exception of Scotland, which goes to Bavaria because of cultural similarities.
As a german, I think this is an insult to all scottish people.
I can't wait to watch him actually do something against Greenland to try and take over it and watch as the rest of Europe pretty much does nothing.
Notice anything unusual?
- Nah.

Alt Text
Two armed guards at entrance of medieval castle. EU flag at top of entrance. Two guests entering. Closeups of guards' blank faces.
Knight appears in the distance, Russian flag above head. Closeups of guards' faces, staring blankly.
Russian flag above knight's head joined by Hungarian and Slovak flags. Closeups of guards' faces, staring blankly.
Flags joined by social media companies' logos. Closeups of guards' faces, staring blankly.
Flags and logos joined by drones. Closeups of guards' faces, staring blankly.
Flags, logos, drones joined by USA flag. Knight slays 1st guard as 2nd guard looks on.
Knight and 1st guard out of frame, EU flag torn in half. 2nd guard says: "Hey!"
Greenland is a goner, I'm afraid.
Even worse, with mounting aggression from East and West, and our own right-wing parties handing our enemies the continent on a silver platter, Greenland's fall is going to usher in a century of humiliation for Europe.
What deadline?
We'll worry about Greenland in about two months. Let's talk about Greenland in 20 days.
Is NOT a deadline, but a delusional person's ramblings. Two months is not 20 days, fyi.
Stupid clickbait article title. I have to downvote this.
20 days is 2 business months for Trump.
If you want every country to get nukes, this is how you do it. Countries with nukes don't get invaded.
I miss the old world.
Let's talk about the Epstein files.
Hot take: even if they would get released uncensored and in full, nothing would happen.
We would just have confirmation on what we aready know.
At this point talking about the files is a distraction from the atrocities the US government commits and not the other way around.
Yeah. I've been saying it for some time that Trumps base was more worried about him possibly blowing Clinton than him fucking kids. Trump could make a press statement saying he fucked kids and he loves fucking kids and he wants to continue fucking kids and the only thing that would happen (apart from the fake outrage) is conservatives would normalize fucking kids.
Yeah, does anybody remember the Panama peppers?
I'm concerned he thinks he's able to take Greenland as easy as he was able to kidnap Maduro.
Iβm concerned that anybody could think such spearheaded attacks could bring anything but chaos. I agree on Greenland, kidnapping a high value target with a flashy operation has nothing to do with conquest. Successful US dominance was based on diplomacy, imo Trump overrates military supremacy once deprived of diplomatic credibility.
I have thought for a long time that the chaos is the point. They're not trying to do something strategically smart. They are trying to diminish the credibility of the US. They are corruptly manipulating US markets with big crazy moves as a means of transferring wealth to their friends while also trying to weaken the US.
They started small to see what they could get away with and have been progressively getting more wild with the moves they make.
If its so strategic you could, Oh I don't know...cooperate with Greenland and Denmark? You know, like normal world leaders?
Or you know. Like the US has done before Trump. There are already US military bases and Iβm sure he could have built more and even extracted minerals for a fee. But nope it has to be his. Fuck everyone else, including the US by proxy.
There's a lot of oil in Greenland. Donnie wants that for his rich buddies.
Yeah, Denmark and the EU would happily let the US military do whatever they want/it needs to defend against Russia and China. This argument is bullshit, just like kidnapping Maduro because if drugs.
If there is one single thing that is consistent, it is that US foreign politics aims at enriching the Trump clan and the US oligarchs. Under this premise, it all makes sense.
The US HAS a base in Greenland. Formerly Thule Air Base, now Pituffik Space Base belongs to the United States Space Force, (which Trump created) and used to station B-52 Bombers and shit like that to threaten the USSR during the cold war.
Thing ist:
The 1951 Greenland Defense Agreement allows the United States to operate the base under a NATO framework, as long as both Denmark and the United States remain NATO members.
(Emphasis by me)
I think Trump wants to leave NATO and keep this important base.
It's people like these that stop humanity from ever evolving past meaningless wars and eternal petty garbage. Trump, Putin, Xi and others are the reason why humanity can't have good things.
Trump has forever tarnished the USA as a beacon of freedom and democracy. I'm hopeful the american people will see this eventually, but history contradicts that hope.
US: We need to violate your national security for our national security to exploit your natural resources.
2 months == 20 days. Not senile at all.
What deadline? Surrender or die?
Fuck the United States of America
"let's talk about Russia, Ukraine, Venezuela, Colombia, Mexico, Canada. Also, where's my fucking Nobel Peace Prize!? I'm the president of peace! I think we're going to have to do something about Mr.Nobel as well."
.....
A related question I have: Was the US ever (publicly) interested in "acquiring" Greenland before Trump? His comments are the first of the sort I ever noticed, but I could imagine the idea having a longer tradition.
They were literally offered Greenland by the Danish ambassodor during WWII, and could have kept it after the war, but chose to hand it back. So no, the purposes of the US with Greenland has been served perfectly fine with the previous diplomatic arrangements they have had.
There is no sense to this other than Trump sees how big and beautiful it looks on a map in the same colour as the US territory.
Weβll worry about Greenland in about two months. Letβs talk about Greenland in 20 days.
60 days = 20 days. Got it.
We need Greenland from a national security situation. Itβs so strategic.
Much strategic. So situation.
I've thinking a lot this past year about John Oliver's segment on how this loon is undeniably, comically stupid, but that he's equally dangerous, and the former often seriously undercuts the latter. He sounds like he's having a stroke most of the time, sure, but I keep wondering how long it will take for leaders to figure out that they need to take his gibberish seriously. Maybe the latest abduction of a world leader will clue them in.
top 50 comments