It made $2 billion but I don't know anyone that saw it. Or if they did, they didn't talk about it.
this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2023
444 points (93.4% liked)
memes
10149 readers
1978 users here now
Community rules
1. Be civil
No trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour
2. No politics
This is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]
3. No recent reposts
Check for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month
4. No bots
No bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins
5. No Spam/Ads
No advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.
Sister communities
- [email protected] : Star Trek memes, chat and shitposts
- [email protected] : Lemmy Shitposts, anything and everything goes.
- [email protected] : Linux themed memes
- [email protected] : for those who love comic stories.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I saw it. I enjoyed it a lot. Pandora's seas look even more stunning than the forest did in the first movie. Loved meeting the Omatikaya clan and Jake's new family (Spider and Kiri too, of course). Also, Quaritch being reborn as a Na'vi made him a much scarier and more interesting antagonist than he was. Can't wait to see what Cameron has in store for us in the sequels.
At this point I can't tell if it is some kind of trolling or are you serious
load more comments
(2 replies)
I saw it, it was shit, specially because I remember the first. The plot of the 2 is horrible, even comparing with first that was generic.
The story moves around the fact that humans want to get rid of blue ppl from a place to explore mineral resources, the leadr of the blues go away, instead of massacre the blue ppl they go for the leader in another place (???)
And half of the movie is just kids doing shit to help the plot show the water, this movie was a long and slow torture.
Holy shit do these movies need to edited down. Watched the latest one a few weeks ago and man was it 90 minutes of plot stretched into a 3 hour film. Felt like I was just watching James Cameron fellate himself on screen. Oh yeah Jimmy, such a beautiful and imaginative world. Shame it's wasted on the blandest characters and most simplistic themes imaginable.
I believe if was 80 minutes I would remember it as a good movie and a visual masterpiece, but now I remember as a slugg story that destroyed a technical achievement.
I watched it in 3D on mushrooms. It was one hell of an experience that way, but my god it felt like it lasted 10 hours
I saw 3D as well and It was undisputable beautiful, but half of the movie I didn't see, I was rolling my eyes. I Just can't accept how a movie so expensive was unable to create a plot aligned with the Idea of a visual masterpiece.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(9 replies)
I pirated it and told people how not good it was.
Thank you for your service
load more comments
(5 replies)
load more comments
(9 replies)
Pros: As an effect of him writing the script in the 90s, the movie feels like a 90s movie with modern fx.
Cons: As an effect of him writing the script in the 90s, the movie feels like a 90s movie, with ancient overdone tropes, including the racist ones.
load more comments
(12 replies)
We're literally in decade four of people underestimating James Cameron
load more comments
(1 replies)
Gotta love the realistic space ships.
Literally melted in my seat when I saw the radiators. FUCKING incredible
load more comments
(2 replies)
I'm assuming the sequel is also forgettable considering that I've barely heard a thing about the plot.
The plot is FUCK YOU THIS WHALE IS GONNA RIP SOME GUYS ARM OFF IN 3D AND IT'S FUCKING DOPE
It has a plot?
No no no no, it doesn't just have a plot. It has the same plot even with all the same protagonists and antagonists.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(5 replies)
Made three out of the top four grossing movies of all time.
I don't really like any of them, but you can't argue with the results. The man knows how to put bums on cinema seats.
I don't know a single person who's ever seen it
I don't know how it made so much money. I guess people are seeing it and not talking about it?
I saw it. Enjoyed it. It was fun to watch. Not sure what else you really need in a movie tbh
load more comments
(1 replies)
This is precisely it. Avatar had originally the exact same problem that the Way of the Water has now. They're tech demos. Interesting, pretty, they move people to see what's what on the theater. But, offer close to nothing emotionally or culturally resonant. It's like a generic roller-coaster, you show up, enjoy the ride, then go get some fries having nothing deeper to say about the experience because the experience doesn't offer anything deep. It doesn't mean the movies are bad or that they weren't enjoyable, that's why they made so much money. But there's no conversation to have around them except to remark on how much they cost to make, or how did the CGI looked like or whether other studios will use the tech invented for this movie on other movies. Plot, characters and symbolism are shallow pools. Specially to an audience that is sick and tired of mega blockbuster sequels.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
My wife and I started watching the second avatar and we turned it off about 90 minutes in, just couldn't be bothered to care or watch it any more. And we never finished it. What a piece of crap
Watched it in IMAX 3d with my kid. It ruled, so much fun to watch. Will never watch it again though, and certainly never at home. That defeats the entire purpose.
load more comments
(4 replies)
load more comments
(2 replies)
Also: deep sea explorer done right and not implode himself by sparing expense.
I mean it's more Fern Gully than pure Pocahontas.
So it may have taken 13 years to come back with a sequel that no one asked for and no one expected. But at least he gave us something. Unlike a certain South African director that shall remain nameless...3 years my ass...
It was such a bad movie too. Dude was really just like "let's remake the first movie, but wetter"
Wait for the next sequel, "let's remake both movies, but hotter"
load more comments
(1 replies)
There are quite a few more sequels in planning
it's up to five films total, now. the remaining three with tentative release dates stretching from 2025 to 2031. cameron has a plan for a further two more but disney hasn't committed past the fifth one---yet
Avatar 3: The Way of Earth
Avatar 4: The Way of Fire
Avatar 5: way of the stayin alive ha ha ha staying alive
load more comments
(1 replies)
13 years!!?? Fuuuuck.
He can't keep getting away with it!
I feel like there was a good movie in Avatar 2 but a lot of the scenes looked like they didn't render them fully. The FPS changes felt random. If they'd done ALL action in 48 and ALL dialogue in 24 it wouldn't have been as bad.
The scenes of the kids rescuing the parents were so gorgeous. Stunning. But compare that to the scene of the boat jumping and crashing? Insane how shitty it looked.
load more comments
(3 replies)
I've always called bullshit on the second movie making that much damn money. There's no way. Not nearly that many people cared about it at all, I seriously think somebody faked that attendance.
load more comments
(9 replies)
view more: next ›