I dunno (piefed.cdn.blahaj.zone)
 

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 333 points 9 months ago (66 children)

I feel like I am getting trolled

Isn't 17 the actual right answer?

  • source
  • hideshow 68 child comments
  • [–] 167 points 9 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 130 points 9 months ago (5 children)

    So it's just an unfunny meme?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 97 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    I think it's meant to play with your expectations. Normally someone's take being posted is to show them being confidently stupid, otherwise it isn't as interesting and doesn't go viral.However, because we're primed to view it from that lens, we feel crazy to think we're doing the math correctly and getting the "wrong answer" from what we assume is the "confident dipshit".

    There's layers beyond the superficial.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • load more comments (64 replies)
    [–] 87 points 9 months ago* (156 children)

    Presuming PEMDAS is our order of operations and the 5 next to the parentheses indicates multiplication...

    2+5(8-5) -> 2+5(3) -> 2+15=17

    Other than adding a multiplication indicator next to the left parentheses for clarification (I believe it's * for programming and text chat purposes, a miniature "x" or dot for pen and paper/traditional calculators), this seems fine, yeah.

    ...I worry about how many people may not understand how to solve equations like these.

  • source
  • hideshow 157 child comments
  • load more comments (155 replies)
    [–] 73 points 9 months ago (16 children)

    Pemdas, parenthesis first, for a total of 3. Then multiplication, 15, then addition. 17. What's hard about this?

  • source
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • load more comments (15 replies)
    [–] 67 points 9 months ago (8 children)

    5 isn't a valid function name, is obviously the right answer.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • load more comments (7 replies)
    [–] 52 points 9 months ago (27 children)

    I'm sorry but isn't this elementary school math?

  • source
  • hideshow 27 child comments
  • load more comments (27 replies)
    [–] 42 points 9 months ago (17 children)

    I got some people really angry at me when I suggested writing some math expression with parenthesis so it would be clearer. I think someone told me that order of operations is like a natural law and not a convention, and thus everyone should know it or be able to figure it out.

  • source
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • load more comments (16 replies)
    [–] 38 points 9 months ago (10 children)

    2 5 8 5 - × + for you RPN fans =)

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • load more comments (10 replies)
    [–] 32 points 9 months ago (11 children)
  • load more comments (10 replies)
    [–] 26 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Any PEMDAS enjoyers in chat?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 9 months ago (5 children)

    Let's not do engagement bait here 😭

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 20 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (9 children)
    (* (+ 2 5) (- 8 5))
    

    Hope some LISP can clear this up

    Edit:

    ( + 2 ( * 5 ( - 8 5 ) ) )
    
  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • load more comments (8 replies)
    [–] 20 points 9 months ago (10 children)

    I'm not seeing a single mention of My Dear Aunt Sally. The youth are lost...

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • load more comments (9 replies)
    [–] 18 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (8 children)

    Hrmm.

    I read that as resulting in 21.

    My education system did fail me.

    I plugged that into ghci as 2+5*(8-5), and it says 17.

    :(

    I did (2+5)*(8-5).

    Doh.

    [Edit: (Double doh! Mistyped that here as 5+2. XD)]

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • load more comments (7 replies)
    [–] 17 points 9 months ago (5 children)

    Precedences are just made up social constructs, don't let the system restrict you, you can evaluate this expression however you want. Go wild.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 14 points 9 months ago (1 child)
    load more comments (1 reply)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›