526
all 36 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] 6nk06@sh.itjust.works 133 points 2 months ago

Given these positive signals

Those idiots waited for 4 years because they followed the hype of the moment. I'm glad I removed Google from my life.

[-] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 54 points 2 months ago

This must be your first time seeing what Google support looks like

This is pretty standard unless you can get an exec’s personal attention.

[-] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 131 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Given these positive signals, we would welcome contributions

Poor Google doesn't have the manpower to implement it. They can only accept contributions from volunteers.

[-] ZoteTheMighty@lemmy.zip 41 points 2 months ago

Google is just a small indie company after all.

[-] eskuero@lemmy.fromshado.ws 90 points 2 months ago

"we would welcome contributions to integrate a performant and memory-safe JPEG XL decoder in Chromium. In order to enable it by default in Chromium we would need a commitment to long-term maintenance."

yeah

[-] ryannathans@aussie.zone 11 points 2 months ago

I.e. the existing implementation is not usable because it's not written in rust

[-] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 months ago

Or would they demand it in Go? Or have they abandoned that?

[-] ryannathans@aussie.zone 4 points 2 months ago

That might work but didn't think go was

  • as safe as rust
  • built for CPU intensive operations (aside from potentially concurrent tasks)
[-] Kolanaki@pawb.social 23 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

The name of the format makes me think it's regular jpeg, but bigger. Wouldn't it be better to be smaller? 🤔

[-] Cort@lemmy.world 27 points 2 months ago

No. They increased the max "canvas" size and increased encoding efficiency. You'd want the file size to be smaller but the file itself to be larger (and consequently more detailed)

[-] bhamlin@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

It's even more confusing than that; the X is for revision 10, and the L is for long term.

It's an update to the JPEG standard intended to cover expected future uses and capabilities.

[-] Brahvim@lemmy.kde.social 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

~~"10 LTS"?~~

[-] Sunrosa@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

In my personal tests of jxl, it manages filesizes 1/9th that of png while remaining visually identical (unless looking VERY closely). It's a massive improvement over jpeg and honestly a replacement for png in most cases.

Like I'm saying 8MB for a 8000x6000 file at max quality (estimating from memory)

[-] dormedas@lemmy.dormedas.com 13 points 2 months ago
[-] JoshsJunkDrawer@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 months ago

I just want a picture of a got-dang hot dog.

this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2025
526 points (99.3% liked)

Programmer Humor

29565 readers
570 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS