In terms of cost of an ad to earnings, and how well, even a targeted ad, can hold a viewer's attention. Have we just become numb to ads? Does targeted advertising actually yield better results?

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 56 points 10 months ago (1 child)

Have we just become numb to ads?

Online I use multiple browser extensions and settings to avoid showing ads. In the offline world there is no way to avoid them but I think I pretty much can ignore them.

I also intentionally do not buy anything I remember seeing an ad for.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 33 points 10 months ago* (1 child)

    In 2020 Freakonomics did a dive into the effectiveness of adverts. Link below (transcripts too). There are sources listed and such. My tl;dr based on memory is that ads in general are not very cost effective for most companies. Ads are very cost effective for companies that sell ads though.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 33 points 10 months ago

    They are effective, but not usually by being convincing. Its usually through saturation so that the first brand that comes to mind when you do need a thing is the one that saturated your market.

    Spon con and influencers are more convincing/creating a parasocial connection.

  • source
  • [–] 23 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    I think ads are super effective for some demographics. Children are probably the best target market. Teenagers, particularly those who seek external validation or align to external norms are a sweet spot. Old guys like me? No effect whatsoever.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

    Brand recognition is important. I have heard for many ads they don't care if you pay attention so long as you hear/see it briefly, because you will be more likely to pick their product later when it's the name you recognise even (especially) if you don't remember why you know it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

    We sometimes play a game around here where we'll turn off the volume during a commercial and try to guess what they're advertising. It's harder than you might imagine for unfamiliar ads.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago

    so osmosis? kinda like the consensus people form from being on the internetverse - not knowing just where they picked a fact or perspective up from, but touting it as an obvious fact or perspective that everyone has

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 20 points 10 months ago

    Ads were effective in that they caused me to stop watching tv soooo... 🀷

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 10 months ago* (5 children)

    Any company that pays for ads closely tracks the efficacy of ads and can more or less prove that the ads are worth it. There's no guess work.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 12 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    For the average person immensely. Especially when you're not familiar with a field and just need something, you'll probably buy something you saw before. For example if you see Makita ads for power tools and you suddenly need to buy a power tool.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    As someone who owns Makita power tools, I feel personally attacked πŸ˜‚

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago

    Eh. In my experience, DeWalt tends to have more power and punch, and the batteries last longer. Makita's impact drivers (at least the ones my company got) really just never had the torque to tighten bolts down to the right NM or ft/lb. I needed. They'll do, I'd rather use an impact driver than nothing. But if I get to pick, I'll pick a DeWalt.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 10 months ago (28 children)

    When was the last time you bought something you'd never heard of

  • source
  • hideshow 28 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 10 months ago (20 children)

    As someone who uses ad blockers, almost every time i buy something. If i want something, I'll find it. I don't need marketing vermin telling me what I should want based on who gave them money. I also hate ads enough that i specifically avoid buying anything for which i have seen or heard an advertisement.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (19 children)

    You go to the store with your eyes closed and pick at random I assume? Product packaging is advertising.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (6 children)

    I'd say technically it is just product labeling, since I'm not forced to interact with between TV shows or games. Have you seen the NoName brand?

    Also I regularly go to an Indian Grocery where packages are plain and I can't read the language, I spend a few bucks and get a good or bad surprise LOL.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (5 children)

    Yeah this is advertising. It's very distinct and clear; done intentionally to stand out amongst other products and be appealing to disinterested consumers.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago (5 children)

    All the time. When I actually need something, then I'll go do a bit of research on different products based on feedback from friends, and what people online say, then use that to inform what I buy. I can't think of any product I bought because it was advertised to me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • [–] 10 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Given that Google generated more than 250 billion U.S. dollars in ad revenue in 2024, I'd say they must be pretty effective.

    Source

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    I believe that the revenue comes more from advertisers paying to advertise on Google than from people paying for the advertised products or services.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Super effective!

    It's not so much that ads can only sell you something anymore. They're able to sell your personal details and identity when abused.

    I believe the issue has been written on even prior to the 2025 article from Wired.

    Data brokers are basically form centralized American platforms which carry immense databases about its users. These demographics can essentially be used to target high value targets. These can include government employees, members of military, and other persons of interest.

    These brokers use Mobile IDs to allow advertisers to micro-target people with their habits, browsing fingerprint, and purchase habits. Even if these companies say they don't associate identities with these Mobile IDs, the brokers can cross-reference enough information to basically de-anonymize a target.

    Plus with influencers these days, many don't disclose if what they do is sponsored or part of a greater outreach campaign. You're basically stuck wondering if you're getting targeted or astroturfed.

    https://www.wired.com/story/google-dv360-banned-audience-segments-national-security/

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 5 points 10 months ago
    [–] 4 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    For me not at all. I'm old enough to research & shop for what I need rather than impulse buy. Tech wise I dont very rarely see any ads at all thanks to strong ad blocking & general privacy consciousness. I try to stick to open source only & fediverse is the only social media I use. For YouTube I never sign in to so I'm not affected by the algorithm & never see ads on it ever (channels I like are in a Joplin note synced between devices). Broadcast TV is recorded via HTPC & ads stripped before episodes are fed into Jellyfin.

    I dont "get" influencers. Even back in the day I used to ask why celebrities always put their name to perfume/aftershave as I'd only buy what I liked the smell of regardless of the brand/name.

    Yeah, I know I'm an outlier, even my mates take the piss.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 2 points 10 months ago

    Not really. I have most of what I want and need. Now I just need to zero my debt, which ain't gonna happen soon. So I don't need new shit. I'm just hitting yard sales.

    And none of that shit ever got me laid like they said it would.

  • source
  • [–] [B] 2 points 10 months ago

    Ads are effective at communicating how other people will view your purchase

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    Ads are extremely effective in aggregate though it's difficult to impossible to assign value to any individual ad. Targeted ads are popular because they are more directly attributable to purchases, but it's also likely that other ads led you towards that decision as well.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    I must have no interests or needs, because I have never bought anything from an ad.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    I actively avoid any product seen in ads. My friend down the street falls for every gimmicky TV ad.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago

    Yeah, I had and have coworkers like that. One guy would have a router, then a new one would come out with claims of being faster so he'd buy that even though he was on ahitty low DSL at the time. I'm like dude your internet provider can't send it to you any quicker, so the next level 100 mbps to 1000mbps to 2.5gig Ethernet router isn't helping when you only have one computer and terrible download speed.

    My other coworker buys every gadget, including shakeweights lol

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments
    view more: next β€Ί