In terms of cost of an ad to earnings, and how well, even a targeted ad, can hold a viewer's attention. Have we just become numb to ads? Does targeted advertising actually yield better results?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] 14 points 10 months ago* (5 children)

Any company that pays for ads closely tracks the efficacy of ads and can more or less prove that the ads are worth it. There's no guess work.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [โ€“] 1 point 10 months ago (4 children)

    I guess they can't put metrics on word of mouth. I would say an outstanding product markets itself and is more effective than millions spent on ads

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [โ€“] 1 point 10 months ago (3 children)

    I would say an outstanding product markets itself

    Of course an outstanding product will spread via word-of-mouth... but as it turns out, word-of-mouth only does so much. I wouldn't say word-of-mouth just "markets itself". You'll need some sort of critical mass before that really works out. There are plenty of good products out there that are not getting bought even if they're better than the competitor, because the competitor has better marketing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [โ€“] 1 point 10 months ago (2 children)

    like modos, the open source e-ink kit with as fast refresh rates as LCD screens? on crowdsource right now

    and as "open printer"? open source printer with refillable ink cartridges, no tracking shenanigans, a repairable design and possibility to just put a roll of paper (at most A3 in width) then letting it print bannerolls... crowdsource too iirc

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [โ€“] 1 point 10 months ago (1 child)

    And how many units do these things sell compared to a shitty HP printer? I would guess the shitty HP printer sells more.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment