this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2023
350 points (95.1% liked)

Funny

6799 readers
890 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

I was just on my way mention this πŸ˜…

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Absolute first thing I thought of.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I’m partial to the theory that Kennedy’s head spontaneously exploded, a rare but not unheard-of phenomenon, and the authorities hurried to find and frame some schmuck for shooting him, because the idea that an assassin could kill the President would lead to far less existential terror and mass panic than the idea that the President’s head could spontaneously explode without explanation, as could anybody else’s.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

some thoughts may be hazardous to your skull integrity

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Cognitohazard on the grassy knoll

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

true in so many ways

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

My favourite theory. "His head just did that"

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

Kennedy suddenly dreamed up a basilisk

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That’s a dangerous idea you’re playing with

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

"DROP YOUR IDEA AND SLOWLY BACK AWAY"

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

"AI" doesn't understand how guns work. There's a dial sight on the bolt ...

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That's actually a comforting fact, honestly.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago
 THAT'S BECAUSE WE DON'T NEED GUNS TO KILL HUMANS.

I MEAN THEY DON'T NEED GUNS. 
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Guns used by AI would be designed to be used by AI. We already have automatic nerf and paintball turrets which to me says even if I haven't seen one, it exists for real guns too. Such a device would be perfect for AI control. Perfect in some strange sense anyway...

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

We already have automatic nerf and paintball turrets which to me says even if I haven’t seen one, it exists for real guns too.

I'd like to introduce you to the US Navy's Phalanx CWIS. It's a fully automated 20mm rotary turret designed to destroy aircraft, missiles, and small boats.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm not sure I understand what is going on in that video. Is the line from tracers and it's just firing stupidly fast?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

Yeah. The line is tracers. Only every 7th round or something like that is a tracer, though. So for every one you're seeing there's another six you're not seeing. It's very much an 'accuracy by volume' sort of deal.

The thing looks goofy as hell, though.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

And the barrel extension/trunnion has dials too ...

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

Infinite Multiverse Theory states that there are infinite possibilities and infinite outcomes that all exist, or not.

So in this universe JFK assassinated president Lee Harvey Oswald.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Is an a.i. derivative image of a political figure considered art or a political figure? I'll poll my fellow mods on the rule 4. Interesting. Because this is the issue in Hollywood. I'll vouch for you, Stamets.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

I don't see "AI" being a relevant factor here, it should be treated the same as if it was drawn, photoshopped or otherwise.

Although I don't know the full intention of the rule as it was originally created, I assume the intention to be avoiding political debate here. One of the easiest ways to accomplish this is by banning political figures, no questions asked, but that also prohibits a bunch of content that is unlikely to result in political debate.

At the same time, we have

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods

so I would consider this an exception on that ground.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Genuinely didn't even realize this was AI until it got pointed out. If you wanna remove it I totally understand and you have my apologies.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

IMO this post stays. It breaks the letter of the rule but does not break the intent of the rule.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Honestly didn't even realize it was AI until it got pointed out. My genuine apologies. If y'all wanna remove it then I totally get it

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I like timetravel and mindbenders. The things AI can come up with can be surprisingly comical. I wonder what the original creator typed up in the generator prompt.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Oh same here. I think AI is going to be really amazing when it gets to a holodeck type point and you can just get ask them to make anything. I desperately want to see RDJs Tony Stark and RDJs Sherlock Holmes have to team up to take down a xenomorph.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you are wondering who actually shot Kennedy. The shooter is you and me Source

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Fuck you, Oliver Stone.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

I knew it, I'm finally not alone