Not sure this is related at all but didn't Microsoft just get busted for findings that they used workers in China as support for their GCC tier Azure stuff?
Visas tied to one company, such as these H1B visas, should not exist. That is the only reason this does not bother me.
if the Secretary of Homeland Security determines, in the Secretary’s discretion, that the hiring of such aliens to be employed as H-1B specialty occupation workers is in the national interest and does not pose a threat to the security or welfare of the United States. whitehouse.gov
So companies need to bribe/lobby the secretary of homeland security?
This was already in the legislation btw.
No one was buying his trump gold card for $1 million to get a visa so he had to up the fee on other visas to make it make sense.
I can see the gold card being a way to give immediate citizenship to the ultra wealth and them tax them if the US was a sensible country. Instead it's a way to avoid taxes.
And what's the penalty for outsourcing to an Indian contracting firm instead? Or opening an office there?
There is a 50% tariff on India currently, because of their import of russian crude oil. Does it also apply to software exports of India?
if you're asking genuinely - no - software does not have a bill of lading.
Trump admin doesn't care about jobs for American workers, they just don't want brown people in America, so that's probably fine with them.
What's the catch so his buddies can still use it?
He can grant them exceptions.
Not the worst idea, maybe even a good idea, going to be executed horribly, for all the wrong reasons, and will only serve the purpose of lining the pockets of some people and forcing allegiance to the regime.
I saw somewhere that the younger generation that just graduated is having a tough time finding IT jobs.
I just hope companies don't just keep it down-sized and continue to not hire junior IT workers
The large companies will offshore the work, the smaller companies that can't afford to "buy" an exception, will just close down.
A lot of these visas are for medical staff ; they can't just be replaced by some guy who did a 6 week coding camp.
The US will lose its programming edge over the rest of the world but yeah the HB1 visa program was designed to exploit people. This won't fix it though.
The proper thing to do would be to fix the program to force median or above wage pay and limit visas for saturated positions.
As an unemployed American programmer I am insulted. This idea that the talent doesn’t exist here has been a lie by corporations to keep IT wages lower.
Fr. America puts a lot of talented students each year and is hugely tech talented. If s company can't find someone for a tech job it's cuz they arent paying a fair wage or have their head so far up their ass almost no real candidate would match their requirements
Louisiana?
force median or above wage pay
This is already a thing . Raising that wage wouldn't be bad though.
Corporations would never lie on a form. If they're putting in a bunch of unpaid overtime or not being given the same benefits they're still being underpaid.
As is typical for Trump. Even if he identifies a problem correctly he's incapable of coming up with a good solution.
It’s another extortion trick. The administration has a way to waive the fee. He’s going to use it to get tech to bend the knee.
Maybe. Could be just needing to offset tax cuts. The present administration and Congress has has cut taxes on the wealthy. Either they find new sources of revenue to fill the hole, or they run up deficit.
https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2025/03/04/what-we-know-about-the-us-h-1b-visa-program/
The number of H-1B applications approved in recent years has climbed. Nearly 400,000 were approved in fiscal year 2024, most of which were applications to renew employment. Rejection rates of H-1B applications spiked during Trump’s first term but fell under former President Joe Biden.
Computer-related jobs have been the most common occupation for H-1B workers for more than a decade. Since fiscal 2012, about 60% or more of H-1B workers approved each year have held a computer-related job. In 2023, the share was 65%, and these workers reported a median annual salary of $123,600.
India is the top country of birth for H-1B workers. Roughly three-quarters (73%) of H-1B workers whose applications were approved in fiscal 2023 were born in India.
This would amount to a tax, mostly on the tech industry employing skilled workers out of India, of about $40B/year.
Pew has a list of top employers. Amazon would take the single largest share, at over $1B/year.
On the other hand, Trump also eliminated the de minimis tariff exemption, which was a move that I would guess is probably very advantageous to Amazon (it let foreign e-retailers sell to American consumers while rarely paying tariffs, since they sold product imported in small quantities, whereas domestic e-retailers selling product tended to import in larger quantity and paid tariff).
kagis
If de minimis ends for all imports in July 2027, as proposed in the tax bill currently being considered in the House of Representatives, the U.S. Treasury would collect an additional $5.2 billion in the first full fiscal year after the change, mostly in tariffs, but including $231 million in customs user fees.
So if you figure that Trump effectively levied a tax that principally hit Amazon's foreign competitors like Shein and Temu with that move, I expect that that partially offsets how hard this hits Amazon.
That being said, a lot of other tech firms are gonna get hurt, and aren't e-retailers. I doubt that this is a good move in terms of US tech strength.
There’s really very little keeping tech jobs in the us. If h1-b’s are too expensive they’ll just be remote jobs to another country. Just when we were finally bringing tech jobs back, whooosh
Uh, they will run of the deficit, not report honestly, and fuck the American economy.
From June 2025, so it’s probably worse projections now.
Sure, Trump had COVID, but his years were ramping up spending significantly before. The idea that Trump is some sort of “shrewd business man” is a complete lie. They supposedly cut all these jobs & they are still going to spend more than last year. So it’s just pure projection.
As I recall from past reading, in general, the US runs up the least deficit during periods when control of the government is split. That is, the Democrats block some of the things that the Republicans want to do with funds, and the Republicans block some of the things that the Democrats want to do with funds. Tax cuts, spending, whatever.
Right now, the Republicans hold a trifecta, control all of the Presidency, House, and Senate, so my expectation is that they will probably tend to adopt policy that runs up more deficit than the norm, since they're unchecked.
Assuming that the Democrats take the House in the midterms, though, the GOP will need to compromise on new policy after that.
Yeah, I'm trying really hard to find the gotcha on this one, but it's starting to look like they might have just accidentally stumbled onto a good policy.
It will, of course, be administered badly, and probably applied in a way that doesn't stand up in court, but the idea itself seems sound. If you're really so desperate for talent to fill that role that you have to bring in someone from overseas, the extra cost is just part of doing business. But if you're just searching overseas for cheaper labour, this kills that option outright.
As the article notes, it could still have negative side effects, like seeing companies move jobs overseas, but I don't find that argument entirely convincing. If it was that easy wouldn't they have already have moved those jobs instead of dealing with a visa lottery?
Unfortunately I suspect the way this plays out is that in about a week they quietly drop it and then FAANG donate a giant pile of money to Trump's "charities" or whatever grift he's up on now. There's no way he actually messes with his financial backers like this. Most likely the whole thing is just a shake-down.
All this policy will do is encourage keeping employees offshore.
I mean, I'm not saying that it's a good policy. My kneejerk take is that it's probably not a good policy. I'm just saying that I don't think that there necessarily has to be a more-elaborate motive than trying to pull in more tax from alternate sources.
EDIT: Also, a lot of these are multinationals. So in terms of the companies involved, they can probably shift workers for whom the tax would be fatal for visa prospects to foreign offices somewhere, as long as the workers are still willing to work for the companies on those terms. That could keep them working for the company. That will kill the path to US citizenship for the workers, though, which an H1-B permits for. In general, I'm skeptical that discouraging highly-skilled workers from becoming US citizens is a great idea for the US.
EDIT2: I'd add that Trump's been on record as making statements about his H1-B policy that are extremely inconsistent. Back when campaigning for his first term, IIRC he claimed that he would expand them, slash them, and leave them alone, partly depending upon who he was talking to. Just last year, he was talking about how they were just fine:
Trump sides with Elon Musk in H-1B visa debate, says he's always been in favor of the program
So it might also be wise to take pronouncements from Trump on the matter with a grain of salt. I don't know how serious this is from the article.
And, as those people who keep posting the rainbow colored "Lets talk about the Epstein files" memes keep pointing out, Trump has had a pretty long history of doing outrageous things to try to direct public attention away from other things that he doesn't want discussed.
All these billionaire techbro CEOs thinking that giving a bully what he wants will make him stop. Pathetic.
Unless I missed it it’s 100k fee once a year for 3 years, not 100k per visa. What a devastating blow to tech. About the same impact as me paying a 1$ service fee on something.
Per person
I’m not seeing anything in the article to suggest that, just the opposite.
all the big companies are on board" with $100,000 a year for H-1B visas
companies would have to pay the same amount for each applicant for six years, US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said.
Oh wait, it’s per year? Jesus. That’s such a naked shakedown.
Real question, is it $100k per visa per year? Or $100k per year for all the visa employees at a company
The fact that no one seems to be able to definitively answer that question makes the policy truly awful.
The child rapist meat puppet is just covering the cost of sending you to a concentration camp the minute you set foot in the fascist states.
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.