629
submitted 21 hours ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

So I'm assuming that Sinclair will be demanding that Tucker apologize and donate and that the FCC will be threatening to cancel his podcast.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 3 points 2 hours ago

It's something all the right wing grifters will realize at some point.

These people have no purpose if Trump forces all the news networks in the country to say whatever he wants. He no longer requires any of their services as mouthpieces.

[-] [email protected] 18 points 8 hours ago

Holy shit I agree with Tucker Carlson?

[-] [email protected] 33 points 12 hours ago

Guess someone forgot to send tucker his check.

[-] [email protected] 43 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

"Finally! I've finished my kill-bot. Come, gather round, as I unveil it to the world"

"But Professor Killington"

"Yes, adorable, one-legged, orphan Timmy?"

"Why did you make a kill-bot?"

"Well, so it would indiscriminately murder anything and everything that moves, of course"

"But professor, that sounds dangerous"

"Don't be a fucking retard Timmy. I know what I'm doing"

"O-okay Professor"

"Now everyone gather round as I turn on the killbot for the very first time, and be amazed as it makes me pancakes"

flips switch

"OH NO, STOP, STOP, STOP KILLING ME, KILL-BOT OH MY GOD, MY SPLEEN, OH, IF ONLY SOMEBODY COULD HAVE FORRSEEN THIS TERRIBLE TURN OF EVENTS".

[-] [email protected] 18 points 13 hours ago

Timmy would go on to run for Congress on an anti killbot policy. He would lose to a bigoted blowhard who insisted on the right for all people to own killbots to make them pancakes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 39 points 15 hours ago

Ugh Fucker Carlson making sense. I hate this world.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 12 hours ago

If he ends up getting Kirked over this, I'll gladly nudge him over the line to "on the right side of history". Won't mourn his passing though, he's peddled enough bullshit to make himself irredeemable as decent human being.

[-] [email protected] 32 points 15 hours ago

Interesting. I don't know who he is, but based on (part of) the Russian shopping video I saw of him yesterday, where he was excited at what everything a Russian supermarket has to offer, finally cumming into his pants after finding that Russia has bread, I wouldn't expect much.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 15 hours ago

I only saw a clip of that. In the piece, did he ever disclose how much a typical Russian makes in a year?

[-] [email protected] 1 points 29 minutes ago

Nope. Too busy fucking a dark rye bagel.

[-] [email protected] 22 points 15 hours ago

Someone did detail that information and response and he had spent like more than a Russian makes in a month at that grocery store, which is geared for the Bourgeois there. Not a working man's store.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 9 hours ago

OMG they have Whole Foods in Russia?!?

[-] [email protected] 8 points 14 hours ago

Awesome. Thanks.

Kudos for the rapid fire response too.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 146 points 19 hours ago
[-] [email protected] 12 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

I was just thinking this is the perfect meme in this context.

Not only a good point... He dared to go against supreme leader, despite his much he normally licks boots, and when other more moderate people are licking boot about all this

I'm confused, but happy to see it.

[-] [email protected] 100 points 18 hours ago

What fucking bizarro world have I stepped into where fash-lite bowtie man is making sense

[-] [email protected] 25 points 17 hours ago

Tucker's a smart guy with a clever tongue. He can lay out an exhaustive, reasoned, rationalist case for basic civil liberties. And then he can come back a day later to lay out an exhaustive, reasoned, rationalist case against them.

Just depends on which side of the line he's standing. Dude's a talk radio mercenary. He'll fight for whichever side he thinks will turn him a profit.

[-] [email protected] 27 points 18 hours ago

He's honestly been right about very niche things for a while, sometimes for the wrong reasons, and never a good person. But he's sometimes right

[-] [email protected] 1 points 7 hours ago

I've noticed this happening more often than I would have imagined, actually. There are some times where Trump or one of his sycophants will make an off-the-cuff remark that is actually, genuinely, a good and logical thing to do. it doesn't happen that often, but it does happen. The bizarre part is that when that idea fails to manifest media coverage detailing how bad it is, they just... give up on it. It's like the conservative political philosophy has completely morphed into being a contrarian force against liberalism, in spite of whatever their personal beliefs might be. If democrats are ambivalent on an issue, so are they.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 13 hours ago

He was full strength fashy before 2021. He was the one floating a lot of these ideas to see how they play, like locking up your political rivals or news media.

I suspect that it turned out that Carlson's mean words towards his superiors at Fox News did him in more than anything. They held grudges after being called dumb fucking cunts or whatever and took the excuse to ask him.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] [email protected] 180 points 20 hours ago

I am floored that I agree with that piece of shit, but… here we are.

What a weird time to live in.

[-] [email protected] 76 points 19 hours ago

Tucker is scared because kimmel and other media personalities are getting nuked. That's his money flow at risk, nothing else.

[-] [email protected] 41 points 19 hours ago

Ya know there a principle I am rather fond of, doing good for bad reasons is still good. While Carlson may be a shitstain undeserving of his kneecaps and while he may be doing a good thing for bad reasons, well I'll take what I can get. We are effectively shrieking into the void like the banshee outside of my window, nobody hears us but they do hear Carlson.

[-] [email protected] 21 points 19 hours ago

Probably, but it's smart to take allies where you can find them. A lot of right-wingers pay attention to Carlson, and his stance is hitting where left-leaning sources have no pull.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 10 points 18 hours ago

He came out in opposition to the Iranian war and was given Ted Cruz the fuck you treatment calling him a dumbass on it. I think that was before Colbert got fired.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 24 points 20 hours ago

Similar thing for me recently. Learned musk is against collective shouts censorship. Made me really evaluate why I was against it. Still against it. Censorship limits freedom of speech but so does deplatforming the censors. Weird times

[-] [email protected] 43 points 20 hours ago

Sure, but sometimes the enemy of your enemy is still your enemy. I agree with this one thing that Tucker said. I vehemently disagree with pretty much every single other thing he says, or has said.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] [email protected] 25 points 16 hours ago

Good for Tucker. Rare time I say it.

[-] [email protected] 44 points 17 hours ago

He just realized that he is NOT SAFE

[-] [email protected] 12 points 17 hours ago

Not since Trump flipped on Russia (again). Maybe he'll feel safer after another Alaska Summit.

[-] [email protected] 16 points 16 hours ago

Holy shit, Tucker dares to go against Trump.

[-] [email protected] 57 points 21 hours ago

Huh, whatever happened to loving how things are done in Putinist Russia, Tucker?

[-] [email protected] 20 points 18 hours ago

I Hate This Timeline.

I agreed with Cucker Tarlson and Marge Sporktoes on things! Wtf???

[-] [email protected] 41 points 20 hours ago

So now he cares about such principles...

[-] [email protected] 3 points 12 hours ago

Only when it has the potential to impact him personally.

[-] [email protected] 29 points 20 hours ago

They keep wanting a civil war between leftwingers and rightwingers, but seems more likely they will have a civil war amongst the rightwingers themselves. 🤦‍♂️

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] [email protected] 15 points 18 hours ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 21 points 20 hours ago

Heartbreaking: The Worst Person You Know Just Made a Great Point

[-] [email protected] 4 points 14 hours ago

Oh NOW he's gone too far?? Fuck. You.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2025
629 points (99.4% liked)

politics

25685 readers
4023 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS