Irrelevant man becomes even more irrelevant.
this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2023
114 points (88.0% liked)
politics
19145 readers
2809 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Nah. He’s now a spoiler candidate. Can’t win, but can shave off Biden’s votes for Trump.
Nader 2000.
I, personally, don't know any democrats who would vote for RFK over Biden. To me, it seems more likely that he'd split the Republican vote.
The worry isn’t with the highly or moderately informed voter block, it’s with the people who pay little to no attention to politics, yet still vote. Those are the people that are more likely to vote for a family name with a positive brand - which “Kennedy” is.
Yeah the only people saying anything positive about him are republicans
Thankfully, polling has suggested that he's actually more popular with Republican voters than Democrat, so we might get a reverse-Nader.
gore won 2000. blame the supreme court, not nader.
Bigger margins leave you less vulnerable to fuckery by corrupt election officials and judges.
Fact of the matter is, if Nader wasn’t on the ballot in 2000, Gore would’ve like had a healthy margin. He had almost 100,000 votes, and Gore only needed several hundred.
Fact of the matter is, if Nader wasn’t on the ballot in 2000, Gore would’ve like had a healthy margin
you can't prove that.
Nope, but you’d have to be fooling yourself if you thought, the people at the Nader rallies were down with Bush. If Nader wasn’t on the ballot, those votes were going to be Gore, people who declined state, or people writing in candidates out of protest.
Gore needed less than 1% of Naders voters. The odds would’ve have clearly been in his favor.
you can't prove a counter factual. In a world where Nader isn't on the ballot, you don't know who the dem nominee was either.
.
Given how stupid American voters are, I'm going to go ahead with "hope for the best but expect the worst" here. I hope to be pleasantly surprised, but I'm sure not going to expect it.
He looks as orange as Trump!
His transition is almost complete
A comb over would help.
Oh no. Anyways..
So now that RFK Jr is going to actually syphon off the mythical "moderate Republicans" from trump...
We won't have to hear that as a reason Biden can't give Dem voters what they want... Right?
Biden doesn't have to give anyone anything. He will be the nominee, provided he has a pulse, and he can easily raise enough money to win his election and help downticket democrats. Everything else is a distraction.
The real trick is, if we see a democratic majority in the house and senate (unlikely, but possible), how will the Democrats avoid the progressive agenda then? Who can they blame for the lack of progress? Probably the courts, and obstructionist Republicans, both problems they could avoid if they actually wanted to pass a progressive agenda.
The current Republican majority in the house is completely due to gerrymandering. I mean that if we had eliminated all gerrymandered districts (going both ways) in America in 2022, the Democrats would hold the House today.
There are lawsuits out in a number of states. The Democrats will almost certainly gain several seats in New York state alone (possibly up to 6 or 7). And there are lawsuits in a ton of southern states from Florida to Texas, where after a recent Supreme Court ruling, it's likely that several of these states will end up with 1-2 additional Democratic seats each (with an equal number of lost Republican seats).
It's possible that political winds will swing further against the Democrats by 2024 elections, but it looks right now like those winds aren't the only consideration.
Good. He was an idiot.
He still is, but he used to be too.
Total dumbass know-nothing.
I think the reason he might be more of a threat to Trump than to Biden is that instead of splitting the Democrat vote, he's more likely to split the insane/idiot vote.
Let's not fool ourselves. While Trump's base is full of idiots, Biden needs a healthy share of idiots to win.
Wasn’t JFK meant to reanimate or something?
Why are they settling for a lesser fk.
John Fitzgerald Kennedy, died November 22, 1963 (aged 46), Dallas, Texas, U.S. 😔
We need to start nipping this in the bud. RFK Jr. isn't your grandfather's Kennedy. He's more akin to a Republican in many ways.
- Anti-Vax. The guy believes that vaccines cause autism.
- He believes COVID 19 was engineered. He thinks it attacks Whites and Blacks, while somehow immunising Asians and Jews.
- He believes Fauci and Bill Gates used COVID 19 to push for vaccines, to give us all autism?
- He thinks the CIA killed JFK.
- He thinks prescription drugs lead to mass shootings.
There are a few things I can agree with. Yes, I do think the pharmaceutical companies have hooks in the government. I think they are joined by other corporations as well, as money = power and we follow the "He who has the gold makes the rules" version of the Golden Rule here rather than "Do unto others as you'd have them do unto you" version. And I'm sure shenanigans were done in 2004 to get Bush over the hump, though Kerry did our side no favours. But the bottom line is that this guy is going to draw away even more people from our coalition. We need to remind each other than 74 million Deplorables came out of the woodwork in 2020 to cast their vote for Trump. We'll need every last person who does not want a Trump-Repeat to vote Biden and ignore shiny objects like RFK Jr.
Dennis Kucinich is his campaign manager?
"Democratic race against Biden"? Uh, are you sure about that?