118
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Who would have thought the guy who took a year to gush over the Japanese Imperial army, was a chud?

Its history.
It's hardcore.
It's really mean of the Palestinians to fight back.

paulie-point What the Japanese did when they suicide bombed American naval carriers was an act of immense bravery, fueled by dire circumstances that pushed the warriors to make the greatest of sacrifices. Palestinians fighting back is different, because I don't think they're cool or based.

Edit: Should probably make it clear I in no way think the Palestinians fighting against Israel is comparable to what the japanese did in WWII. I just think it's kinda telling that a guy who has spent 20+ hours glamorizing the japanese for fighting a "lost cause", somehow thinks it's wrong for the palestinians to fight a fight he thinks they have no chance of winning.

all 37 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 57 points 2 years ago

There are lots of grievances Palestinians could cite that deserve attention

Cite to whom? Who's going to come to their aid? They've been crying out for the support of the international community ( lmayo ) for decades, and all the West has done is give Israel more weapons and told Palestinians to cry harder. Just say you only love dead Palestinians.

[-] [email protected] 56 points 2 years ago

There is NO POSITIVE outcome for them here (except to personally bolster their chances to stay in power).

What the fuck is he on about? What power? In what way does living in an open air prison constitute having power? How does getting bombed every so often confer power? How does he see NO POSITIVE outcome to pushing back against this cruel apartheid state?

[-] [email protected] 45 points 2 years ago

Its just the most vulgar fucking expression of the accusation that muslim states and their leaders are completely amoral and power-hungry cynics(and therefore they dont oppose China over Xinjiang etc.)

Disgusting racist freak shit.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

How does he see NO POSITIVE outcome to pushing back against this cruel apartheid state?

I'm failing to see positive outcomes myself. It doesn't seem like a fight they can win, and while they might get some measure of revenge, they'll die, and Israel will inflict disproportionately more damage on them and the Palestinian people.

Fighting oppression is of course just, but what does victory actually look like for Palestine here, and how likely are they to achieve it?

[-] [email protected] 52 points 2 years ago

There are a lot of grievances Palestinians could cite that deserve attention

Gee Dan, what an intelligent thought. If only they had thought to tell people that they've been under attack for the last 70 years. What a world we could live in if only we'd known Israel wasn't being very nice to them.

[-] [email protected] 46 points 2 years ago

Don't forget this is the same guy who parroted the hard times make strong men good times make weak men fascist shite. And used it to describe the fall of Rome.... complete ahistorical twatface

[-] [email protected] 40 points 2 years ago

Again just treating Palestinians like they ought to be happy to be treated like cattle, combined with the illusion that if they never resisted, there is a positive outcome at the end of the tunnel for them.

If there is no positive outcome for them from this, then there is no positive outcome for them no matter what, and since this guy is a fucking pop historian asshole he 100% has at some point in time valorized the idea of "we can at least choose when and how we will die, and show our oppressors that we do not fear them." Its just crypto-zionist bullshit.

[-] [email protected] 23 points 2 years ago

If the cattle would calmly line up for the slaughter then they wouldn’t be getting the prod, now would they?

smuglord

[-] [email protected] 38 points 2 years ago

This guy needs 4 hours to summarize half a pop history book, of course he cant tweet.

[-] [email protected] 38 points 2 years ago

This was their Little Big Horn you fucking door knob. You think you're saying anything they don't know? The oppressors will never let them mount something like this again so the decided to take some of the assholes with them. Why is this so hard to understand?

[-] [email protected] 36 points 2 years ago

Why didn't Palestinians just vote?

[-] [email protected] 30 points 2 years ago

I've never heard of this guy before, but he glamorized Japanese kamikaze pilots?

Sounds like a fascist to me.

[-] [email protected] 39 points 2 years ago

He has a podcast called Hardcore History that, while the storytelling can be compelling, is based mostly on his "just asking questions" approach to history, almost like a weird parallel evolutionary branch of Joe Rogan thinking. He's not an historian, he just likes books about WWII and ancient Rome. His most recent series was about Imperial Japan and there were a lot of admiring words for both sides in the Pacific theater.

[-] [email protected] 17 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I liked his WW1 series, but everything after that has made me start to question the legitimacy of that series.

[-] [email protected] 25 points 2 years ago

He's not the actual worst, but he's the perfect example of skeptically approaching politics without a material lens. He's got the right idea but the exact wrong approach that leads to wildly incoherent conclusions that, since they're not the accepted mainstream dogma, must be correct.

[-] [email protected] 17 points 2 years ago

I just thought it was near how he focused on the horror of warfare in WW1. Something that was usually overshadowed in American highschool education because WW2 was the big topic.

He simultaneously flip-flopped between "was is hell and terrible" to "hey isn't this weapon system cool?"

[-] [email protected] 15 points 2 years ago

He had probably just read The Face of Battle by John Keegan and riffed from there.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago

I think he did mention that at some point, but I listened to it like 7 years ago and don't feel like relistening to a 17 hour podcast

[-] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago

He’s not the actual worst

He’s pretty close to the bottom of the barrel though, he had Elon Musk on his other podcast which is devoted entirely to liberal civility politics. Same show went on hiatus when trump was elected because he got too weepy about “how divided our country is now” to continue

[-] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago

The barrel goes way deeper than that my friend

[-] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

Oh for sure, he’s just got my personal loathing among podcasters I’ve listened to lol

[-] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago

Yeah that's exactly where he's at. The greatest possible amount of annoying from a podcaster that I'll ever listen to.

[-] [email protected] 28 points 2 years ago

This plays into the hands of hardliners on both sides

Yeah, specifically into the hands of people like him, so he can ignore oppression of Palestinians on the basis that they're too uppity to be listened to.

[-] [email protected] 22 points 2 years ago

Glad I haven't listened to this guy since I was a teenager. Books are a much better way to consume history.

[-] [email protected] 18 points 2 years ago

Glad I've never listened to this guy. How I dodged that bullet given whenever I bring up " I listen to podcasts", he's always the first suggestion anyone gives me, I'll never know.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 2 years ago

consumers gonna consume

[-] [email protected] 17 points 2 years ago

close the ears of many who might be willing to listen/help

So according to this guy, if you are being violently attacked and brutalized, the most important thing you can do is make sure your struggle to defend yourself is palatable for Western audiences, or else they may not "listen" or give you "deserved attention" (for all the good that will do)

I don't know, I think I would rather take several hundred captured occupiers and their equipment instead. Seems like that will be more useful for liberation than relying on the fickle sympathy of the common occidental chud.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 2 years ago

For 70 years the whole world has condemned Israel but sat quietly by as they eradicated Palestine. For 70 years those "willing to listen/help" didn't do enough to help. Palestinians no longer need to give a single fuck about what westerners think or optics, because they did care for decades and it got them literally nothing.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago

So according to this guy, if you are being violently attacked and brutalized, the most important thing you can do is make sure your struggle to defend yourself is palatable for Western audiences, or else they may not "listen" or give you "deserved attention" (for all the good that will do)

Make sure your struggle is a tasty treat for burgerbrains to consume or else burgerbrains won't care or will actively dislike you. galaxy-brain

[-] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago

Curiously its never the people who are willing to help whose ears close, but the ones who just perpetually might be.

[-] [email protected] 16 points 2 years ago
[-] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago

SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP

I'm so tired of Liberals pretending they care about Palestinians and doing concern troll armchair quarterbacking on what the Palestinians "should do" instead. Whatever your dumbass passive idea is, it's already been tried and it failed.

this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2023
118 points (100.0% liked)

the_dunk_tank

15985 readers
1 users here now

It's the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to [email protected]

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS